Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate Armed Services Committee Meeting.. (on nbc now)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:39 AM
Original message
Senate Armed Services Committee Meeting.. (on nbc now)
Sen Warner looking for nominations..

McCain answering, he is open for nominations at this time.


Let's see how kosher this investigation goes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jadedcherub Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm watching too. Here goes!
(www.cspan.org for those w/out cable)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Warner said that the Bushies 'responded quickly'...
...to the 'abuse' scandal. But didn't they know about this back in January?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. Yep, just like 911...
I don't think I can stomach another white wash..

I'm really going to be sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Setting the groundlines for the accounting of the abuse and torture of
Iraqis. Aren't these people under Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UnityDem Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. Warner starting out with "few bad apples"
babble....of our wonderful military....heartened by Bush's words...yuck.........
I thought he was from Virginia....not babble-lon-ia....(weak attempt at humor)....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Isn't Warner pro-Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UnityDem Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. COMPLETELY PRO-Bush
sickenly so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oddman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
55. Yup . . . a few bad apples . . .
but they weren't in Iraq!


As President Bush put it, they are an exceptional "few bad apples"
whose actions "do not reflect the nature of our country."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. Warner reading *Bush's statement from yesterday. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. I hope Kennedy is taking notes and gives him a good reaming during the
hearings...Teddy has been really eloquent lately and dead on balls accurate with his descriptive metaphors..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. Senator Levin
thanking Taguba.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. Sen. Levin : thanking Taguba for his professionalism in the report n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. Stephen Cambone: not complete information due to 5 other investigations
that are ongoing. In other words...we are going to stall giving answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Cambone Neo / PNAC
Edited on Tue May-11-04 09:10 AM by Tinoire
Saturday, May 08, 2004, 01:50 A.M.
Rumsfeld warns of worse prison-abuse images


By Craig Gordon
Newsday

<snip>

One of Rumsfeld's testiest exchanges occurred when Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., pressed him to describe who was in charge at Abu Ghraib prison. When Rumsfeld suggested that the answer be given by Lt. Gen. Lance Smith, the deputy commander of Central Command, McCain interrupted:

"No, Secretary Rumsfeld, in all due respect, you've got to answer this question," McCain said. "This is a pretty simple, straightforward question. Who was in charge of the interrogations? What agencies and what — or private contractors were in charge of the interrogations? Did they have authority over the guards? And what were the instructions to the guards?"

When Smith tried to answer, McCain interrupted again: "Mr. Secretary, you can't answer these questions?"

Rumsfeld said the responsibility rested with officers who oversaw detentions and with military intelligence officers in charge of interrogations. "And the responsibility, as I have reviewed the matter, shifted over a period of time," he said.

Several senators also pressed Rumsfeld to explain how far up the chain of command the approval to "soften up" prisoners for questioning was known or approved, though the answer remained unclear. An Army investigation said military interrogators enlisted military police from the 800th Military Police Brigade to set "physical and mental conditions for favorable interrogation" of prisoners.

At one point, Rumsfeld brought his undersecretary of intelligence, Stephen Cambone, to the table, and Cambone indicated that he was aware of recommendations by one senior officer to improve efforts to get more information out of interrogations but didn't say whether he had signed off on them. ((collective amnesia all over again))

<snip>

newsblaster.cs.columbia.edu/NBproxy.cgi?sentence=135

http://216.239.57.104/search?q=cache:5Af5053RbKkJ:newsblaster.cs.columbia.edu/NBproxy.cgi%3Fsentence%3D135+Cambone+%22Rumsfeld+warns+of+worse+prison-abuse+images%22&hl=en

===

Who is this Stephen Cambone? Washington Times reporters Bill Gertz and Rowan Scarborough recently wrote the following (strangely the original page with this article has disappeared; I recovered this from the Google cache):

Stephen Cambone has assumed sweeping power over the Pentagon's intelligence bureaucracy as the new undersecretary of defense for intelligence.

We obtained a copy of a May 8 memorandum from Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz setting up the new office. It states that the office takes over all 286 persons and policies attached to the intelligence, counterintelligence and security, and other intelligence-related issues that were in the portfolio of the assistant defense secretary for command, control, communications and intelligence, once the Pentagon's top intelligence official.

Mr. Wolfowitz said the new office is in charge of "all intelligence and intelligence-related oversight and policy guidance functions" in the office of the secretary of defense.

Mr. Cambone, a protege of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld who has little intelligence experience, will have several deputies, including three charged with intelligence warning, war fighting and operations, and counterintelligence and security.

The key phrase of the implementing guidance memorandum relates to the office's power over other Pentagon intelligence agencies that in the past have resisted control by Pentagon policy-makers.

It states that the new undersecretary will "exercise authority, direction, and control over the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA), the National Reconnaissance Organization (NRO), the National Security Agency (NSA), the Defense Security Service (DSS) and the DoD Counterintelligence Field Activity (CIFA)."

<snip>


http://www.demog.berkeley.edu/~gabriel/weblog/2003_05_01_archive.html

===

What else do we know about Dr. Cambone? He is a 1982 political science Ph.D. from Claremont Graduate School. He was the staff director of the Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile Threat to the United States, also known as the "Rumsfeld Commission."

Here's the kicker: besides being "a protege of Donald Rumsfeld," he also was one of the authors of the Project for the New American Century's Rebuilding America's Defenses, the radical, Strangelovian document that formed the basis for the Bush administration's National Security Strategy.

So, having failed, despite Judith Miller's best efforts, to find any evidence of chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons in Iraq, the Pentagon is sending a new team of 1400 people, headed by one of Rumsfeld's closest buddies, a civilian political science Ph.D. with little intelligence experience, who also happens to be a neoconservative PNAC guy (a "Straussian," too, for those who think that matters). What are the odds that he will not claim to find something?

Here's my question for Cambone: who wrote the following sentence in the PNAC report?

On page 60, in the section "Transforming U.S. Conventional Forces," which discusses long-term plans for the U.S. military:

"And advanced forms of biological warfare that can 'target' specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool."


<snip>

http://www.demog.berkeley.edu/~gabriel/weblog/2003_05_01_archive.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. MG Miller seems to be Cambone's "pet project"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. Thanks for taking the time, Tinoire.
Good info there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. When Rumsfeld said this:
" "And the responsibility, as I have reviewed the matter, shifted over a period of time," he said." Does he mean when Bush switched everything ocver to Condi?

quotation taken from 1st half of article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #22
41. I took it to be pussy-footing around who in that prison was in charge
Edited on Tue May-11-04 09:13 AM by Tinoire
because they need to hang Karpinski and protect a few other people.

I have a thread on MG Barbara Fast here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=543196#545120 That's one of the people they desperately need to protect because if she comes down, Miltary Intel comes down as well as the civilian intel agencies who were working there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TeeYiYi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
69. Wow. Great research post Tinoire. Thanks. ....n/t
TYY:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. What's the difference between an internee and a detainee?
Sorry if off topic. Hear this quite often lately, and just wondered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. Internee is being held as a prisoner for a reason-typically civilians
detainee is being held pending a resolution of status (EPW or release them)...thet have not been classified yet. detainees can be held indefinitely..and so can internees..but they have been classified-held for specific reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #20
29. American citizens will be called: internees? After we're arrested?
mostly democrats..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. No, we would be detainees..then if convicted, we'd be internees
Edited on Tue May-11-04 09:08 AM by Solly Mack
I'm getting this straight from my husband..a military police soldier

The example he gave is..say shots were fired from a building...they would sweep the building detaining everyone in the building...then the actual sniper would become the internee.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jadedcherub Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #13
24. Difference is:
a detainee is held accused of a crime, while an internee is not accused of a crime, but is held prisoner as a "...preventive security measure..." during an armed conflict.

.jc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. Thanks, jc and Solly Mack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #11
65. He's a smooth-talking creep.
Got a lot of his kind on Wall Street. Mostly in firms under or about to be under indictment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
16. Cambone: admits that contractors may have interrogated detainees
Fay is investigating this at this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
17. Cambone "Rejecting Geneva Convention strengthens it"...
War is Peace... :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. if you play Cambone's testimony BACKWARDS
it might make sense or be close to the truth.

what a neocon TOOL. :puke:

read KRUGMAN today!

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/11/opinion/11KRUG.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #17
62. Doug Feith: "Geneva Convention = "law in the service of terrorism"
Douglas Feith, President Bush's Undersecretary of Defense for Policy — and number three man at the Pentagon — reportedly summed up Protocol One of the Geneva Conventions of 1977 as "law in the service of terrorism".

http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2004/05/07/rights/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
18. Cambone is going blah...blah...blah TAKING VALUABLE TIME
from what should be the business of the hearings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. This is the demonstration of what a free country we are....
The important part is: are Iraqis living in a free country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Cambone, gen Smith designed to intimidate Taguba. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
23. Lt General Lance Smith: we are fixing the problems, imvestigations are
ongoing. Cites gen. Fay investigation again...looks like a day of stonewalling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
27. It is very interesting that the "defense" of bush's policies in Iraq...
is being put forward BEFORE the main witness speaks. Usually the accusations are made FIRST and then the explanation after. This admin is shitting bricks, imo, and it shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. Taguba recommends investigation into Military Intelligence
He was only charged to investigate MP's and prison operations around abuse.

Military Intel is going to pay for this....big time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
30. Tagabu up now...looks steady
just spoke to the point of contractors, another investigation recommended and is ongoing. His area of investigation was military police, not military intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jadedcherub Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. He looks...like he has a secret or something.
He actually looks sort of jolly. That's good, good to see he's comfortable up there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. "looks jolly"? Looks very focused and serious, to me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
33. Warner met with Cambone privately over the weekend to be briefed
hmmm :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #33
36. Cambone is just an element to muddy the waters and difuse
the blame. I tried to follow what he said and I am lost. Anybody here got a handle on what he really said?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #36
42. and he's doing his best to focus blame on Karpinski and away from Sr.
Military and Rummy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #42
128. That's what I thought: sacrifice the woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
35. It appears these other two witnesses will be able to dilute Taguba's
testimony? Simply from time aspect alone. I hope most of the questions are asked o Gen Taguba?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. This guy is a shining example of our administration: an empty suit
used to deny, confuse, intimidate, take time, dilute testimony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
38. ## Support Democratic Underground! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v2.0
==================

The time now is 10:11:38AM EDT, Tuesday, May 11, 2004.

There are exactly...
5 days,
13 hours,
48 minutes, and
22 seconds left in our fund drive.

This website could not survive without your generosity. Member donations
pay for more than 84% of the Democratic Underground budget. Don't let
GrovelBot become the next victim of the Bush economy. Bzzzt.

Please take a moment to donate to DU right now. Thank you for your support.

- An automated message from the DU GrovelBot


Click here to donate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
40. White Wash Warner!
Cambone undersecretary is trying to coverup the RESPONSIBITY that the civilian defense authorities have in the TORTURE.

Warner is letting him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
r_u_stuck2 Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. They are pushing
Trying to shove this thing way down the chain of command to the local level. "We did nothing wrong in Washington", what a set-up. Any dummy can see through this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #40
44. Warner...he did marry Elizabeth Taylor...and she divorced him. I can
see why she got bored!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oddman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #44
49. Can you imagine acquiescing to be Liz Taylor's
7th husband????

What a goon . . .


I vote, does you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oddman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
45. Cambone is a boob!
Obfuscate and spin . . .

Taguba has his proverbial hands tied right now . . .


As President Bush put it, they are an exceptional "few bad apples"
whose actions "do not reflect the nature of our country."






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #45
47. They sent these minions to intimidate Taguba...it is clear now. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
46. Warner: What do you think went wrong....to Taguba?
lack of supervision, leadership, etc.


asking about CIA and contractors involvement....

lots of information contained w/i 6,000 pages
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
48. Levin asking if Taguba agrees with ICRC report.
Taguba says,
Yes, sir.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. Good question! It is a failure of leadership...make it clear, Levin! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #50
56. Cambone answers Levin's question as if he were a King addressing his fool.
Arrogance... it is like he thinks Levin is a fly he wants to swat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
51. anyone know when Cambone was appointed head of this new commission?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
52. Military Intelligence
"Tactical control of all units"

Cambone disagrees....

Bwhahahahaha....its finger pointing...

Intel vrsus regular army!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
53. What Taguba just said was also stated in the senate hearing last week
Edited on Tue May-11-04 09:22 AM by Solly Mack
Karpinsky was more or less taken from command and MI effectively put in charge..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #53
76. Good, he just cleared this aspect up...
she retained her role as in charge of detention operations...so she's lying when she claims they (MI) kept her out...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
54. This guy cambone says the interrogation techniques in Iraq
were different from camp x-ray...That was not my understanding...Is he lying?


failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. "decision was made at command level in Iraq"
Edited on Tue May-11-04 09:24 AM by soup
think he just fumbled that one.

edit to add quotation marks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #57
58. Yup...definitely fumbled this...now levin's rippin' him a new one! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #54
59.  anyone know when Cambone was appointed head of this new commission?
This is an important issue..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #59
146. Earlier in this thread, someone said May 8????
Like, as in, last effing Saturday????????


(re: Cambone appointment)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oddman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #54
60. This guy Cambone is unbelievable . . .
They all make me sick . . .


As President Bush put it, they are an exceptional "few bad apples"
whose actions "do not reflect the nature of our country."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:24 AM
Original message
Every other word out of his mouth has been a lie
Torture Sanctioned by Pentagon

Bar Association: Torture Sanctioned by Pentagon Appointees
Salon is reporting that a report compiled by the Committee on International Law of the New York City Bar Association has found that the American military's treatment of detainees and prisoners of war in Afghanistan, Cuba and Iraq violates international law — and the compilers of the report say that the techniques employed by interrogators at prisons such as Abu Ghraib were "sanctioned by Pentagon political appointees."

Joe Conason of Salon reports that Scott Horton, a partner at Patterson, Belknap, Webb and Tyler and chair of the Committee on International Law was told by "senior" members of the Judge Advocate General Corps that high ranking political appointees were behind the abuse. Says Conason:

http://www.warblogging.com/


    Lack of protection

    <snip>

    Indeed, Horton says that the JAG officers specifically warned him that Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas J. Feith,one of the most powerful political appointees in the Pentagon, had significantly weakened the military's rules and regulations governing prisoners of war. The officers told Horton that Feith and the Defense Department's general counsel, William J. Haynes II, were creating "an atmosphere of legal ambiguity" that would allow mistreatment of prisoners in Iraq and Afghanistan.


    Douglas Feith, President Bush's Undersecretary of Defense for Policy — and number three man at the Pentagon — reportedly summed up Protocol One of the Geneva Conventions of 1977 as "law in the service of terrorism".

    In the past, Conason writes, all interrogations conducted by military personnel were monitored by a member of the Judge Advocate General corps from behind a two-way mirror. All interrogations were monitored, and the JAG officer was "emplowered to stop any misconduct". But senior Pentagon officials removed that requirement. Not only did JAG officers no longer monitor interrogations, but private military contractors were allowed to conduct interrogations.

    <snip>

    After hearing the complaints of the JAG officers, Horton and his bar colleagues wrote to Haynes and the CIA's general counsel in an effort to clarify U.S. policy on the treatment and interrogation of detainees. Those inquiries, he recalls, "were met with a firm brushoff. We then turned to senators who had raised the issue previously, and assisted their staff in pursuing the issue directly with the Pentagon. These inquiries met with a similar brushoff." The Bush administration wanted no meddling by human rights lawyers as it brought democracy and human rights to the benighted region.

    <snip>

    Horton says that career military officers at the Pentagon were "greatly upset" by what they regarded as the deliberate destruction of traditions and methods that have long protected soldiers as well as civilians. Those officers, and others who may have evidence to offer, are obviously reluctant to step forward and speak because they fear reprisal from the Pentagon and the White House. They have been instructed not to talk to anyone about these issues. It is to be hoped that in the investigations to come -- whether or not Secretary of State Donald Rumsfeld and Undersecretary Feith keep their jobs -- those conscientious officers will be able to tell what they know about the decisions that led to this national disaster.


    <snip>

    http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/2004/05/07/rights/index.html



http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x49554
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
64. More of the same...blame everyone else stuff...
If personal responsibility is a core conservative principle...these people are the most liberal people in history...
failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
68. So, who asked or paid Douglas Feith to weaken the rules and why? y?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
61. Get Him Levin! Chew up that "cam"bone! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
63. Levin is looking for bear...
I'm hoping all the other Democrats are just as aggressive and some Repubs will aloso be as honorable...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
66. McCain asking Taguba...Taguba says he was not in Guantanamo.
You found breaks of the Geneva convention?
Yes sir!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
67. "Moved prisoners around to avoid Red Cross inspection...?"
"Yessir". Taguba to question by McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #67
71. and that's a command level decision..and it's ILLEGAL
to the max
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #67
73. this is a good start!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oddman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
70. Abuse not policy
hmmmm . . . I guess that does it!!!

Just a few bad apples . . . yeah right . . .


As President Bush put it, they are an exceptional "few bad apples"
whose actions "do not reflect the nature of our country."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
72. Taguba says that it was soldiers thinking they were following legal
directions, not the policy from the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oddman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #72
77. Don't the costumes look nice
on the Generals. All the fancy decorations and ribbons and medals. It kind of looks like halloween . . .


Does anyone know that you’re my hero . . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
74. John McCain - have to wonder how painful
this is for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #74
78. Taguba does not want to give leeway to Karpinski. Doesn't believe
her excuse that she was precluded from controlling certain areas of the prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #78
80. Cambone caught himself lying, me thinks....Not aware, yes aware
of Bremer's concerns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #74
100. Sen Inhope anti-trivia speech...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
75. Taguba disagreed with Gen Karpinsky....
that she was excluded from certain areas of the prison, from his interviews wih her...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #75
82. last week when they told of the order that put MI in charge
it came across like Karpinsky could have been prevented from entering certain places...but as long as she remained in charge of the detention operations...she would have access to any area
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #82
91. Not if she didn't have the proper clearance
Edited on Tue May-11-04 09:46 AM by Tinoire
MI can keep you out by claiming that you "compartmentalized intel" is being processed in there and that you only have a Top Secret clearance.

Just saying it's possible. Personally, I'm not totally buying it. But why is no one asking if http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x543196">MG Barbara Fast, head of intelligence for the U.S. command in Baghdad, ever visited? The intel part belonged to her and wings 1A & 1B were reportedly under her control.
The interrogators, civilian and military, were all hers. But not a peep about her, it's as if she doesn't even exist.

On edit (I know you read this already but posting for others)

...except for one brief mention, the 55-page report contains nothing about the role of the top military intelligence officer in Iraq, Maj. Gen. Barbara Fast. As head of intelligence for the U.S. command in Baghdad, Fast was in charge of interrogators at Abu Ghraib, where prisoners were beaten, sodomized and photographed in sexually degrading positions.

from: Report Steers Clear of Interrogators' Boss

http://www.sptimes.com/2004/05/08/Worldandnation/Report_steers_clear_o.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #91
95. I wonder why Fast isn't being brought forth as well
because they all need to be
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #91
99. Yet one of the CACI mercenaries had NO security clearances at all!
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #99
110. Grand dark comedy at its best! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
79. McCain says Karpinski claims she was excluded from certain
Edited on Tue May-11-04 09:34 AM by LizW
areas of Abu Ghraib. Taguba says that she was in charge of all detention facilities, and it is hard for him to believe she was excluded from any area of any facilities.

Oops, sorry I duped what kentuck said. I'm not fast enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
81. any mention of Boykin yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #81
84. Are you kidding? They really don't want to know.They want to whitewash.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
83. Smith interrupts...he must be feeling that it is getting to close to him
for comfort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oddman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
85. Come on Kennedy
Let them have it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
86. Go Kennedy go - tell 'em about the Newweek story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #86
87. What newsweek story? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #87
90. Ck. it out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #90
92. Thanks! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oddman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
88. Cambone invokes the Matrix . . .
ooooohhhhh . . .



Does anyone know that you’re my hero . . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
89. Cambone is an obfuscator of the first category!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #89
97. Inhofe outraged by the outrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #97
101. Inhouf says that all the detainees in AG are there
because they are terrorists, criminals, who probably have American blood on their hands. Does this man not read?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
93. Cambone answered by NOT specifically speaking of the CIA
only MI and private contractors...Kennedy asked about ALL 3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #93
94. Kennedy: how can you expect the lower levels to understand
rules and regulations if at your level there is no clear understanding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
96. Cambone defining "Gitmoize"
as meaning Miller intended to fix the disorder tha existed in Abu Ghraib. Riiiiiight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #96
116. Inhofe is outraged -- a joke this guy is
Only six or seven persons are involved. These prisoner aren't in there for traffic violations, they probably have American blood on their hands.

Going on now about Husseins torture stories.

This fucking asshole just doesn't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #116
145. This is the typical conservative response.
When they are caught in criminal, immoral or illegal activities they jump up and down shouting 'What about him? What about him?'. They seem to think that if others are violating rules, regulations, laws or codes of decency then they also have the right to do so.

They act like spoiled children. I am ashamed to live in a nation where a prick like can rise to a position of power (not to mention , the entire bush administration).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #145
148. That pre-dates Aristotle. Real old technique.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
98. Inhofe: the one that thinks rape is OK. Murderers, terrorists
I am more outraged at the outrage than the violations!!!!
This guy is a criminal.
Political agendas being served by this!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #98
109. I am enraged by his outrageous outrage at the outrage.
um, did I say that correctly?

IOW - whaddapoophead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #98
111. Imhofe blaming it on partisan politics....
Not concerned about the abuse or torture...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oddman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
102. Can you believe Inhofe?????
Edited on Tue May-11-04 09:46 AM by Oddman
I can't believe what he is saying!!!
"I'm outraged by the outrage!!"

UNFUCKINGBELIEVABLE!!!!!!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #102
104. He makes me want to puke :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ann Arbor Dem Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #102
107. What a boob!
"The prisoners aren't there for traffic violations." WTF?!?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #102
114. He is a religious right wing creep
Edited on Tue May-11-04 09:49 AM by seemslikeadream
and fighting for his life. He knows it's coming to an end real soon once these hearings get HOT! He has voted 100% of the time with the Christian Coalition agenda.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #102
118. Where the hell is Inhofe from?
My deepest sympathies to the good people of that state. This guy is unfreakingbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ann Arbor Dem Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #118
123. He's from Oklahoma n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #118
131. Oklahoma / Another Ashcroft-type
Pornography Debacle In Inhofe's Office Showcases Hypocrisy Over Hormel Tantrum

WASHINGTON -- The hypocrisy of Sen. James M. Inhofe, R-Okla., who objected to James C. Hormel's recess appointment as the ambassador to Luxembourg on "moral" grounds, was put on full display today as several of his aides were discovered to have downloaded large quantities of pornography off the Internet, according to the Human Rights Campaign.

"The sanctimonious, holier-than-thou veil was ripped from the face of Senator Inhofe," said HRC Communications Director David M. Smith. "In light of this astounding hypocrisy, we call on Inhofe to lift his holds on all nominations and apologize to James Hormel and the American public for letting his bigotry stand in the way of the nation's business."

Computer pornography was discovered during a systems check, according to the Capitol Hill newspaper Roll Call. The newspaper reported that there was such a voluminous collection of lewd and lascivious material that it "messed up the senator's computer system." A source told Roll Call that three male staffers were responsible. An Inhofe spokesman said in the article that "this resulted in immediate and appropriate disciplinary action being taken against those involved." There is no word on whether the staffers were fired.

Last week, Inhofe blocked all pending Clinton administration nominations because he was upset over the June 4 recess appointment of openly gay philanthropist James Hormel as ambassador to Luxembourg. Inhofe attacked the appointment with a blistering statement. "President Clinton has shown contempt for Congress and the Constitution," Inhofe said. "He has treated the Senate confirmation process as little more than a nuisance which he can circumvent whenever he wants to impose his will on the country."

<snip>

http://www.rslevinson.com/gaylesissues/features/collect/religiousreich/blreich007.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #131
136. I know that type
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #102
120. Didn't miss a single freeper talking point! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #120
135. A constituent of Inhofe
Edited on Tue May-11-04 09:53 AM by seemslikeadream
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #102
141. Inhofe is an idiot.
"Show a picture of mass graves for every picture of prisoners."
Tit-for-tat.
Gotcha last.
Except...one has nothing to do with the other.
What a moran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
103. Inhofe is the WORST Senator.
I wonder if he also runs an under-age girl sex ring? Or if he is just a customer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
105. The apologist that's on now is making my stomach turn
the whole "they probably have American blood on their hands" is NOT an excuse for our soldiers acting like monsters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #105
113. Prisoners should be thanking Allah that it is the US and not Saddam
having them in prison.
He has not asked one question!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #113
126. yep, torturers with white skin are SOOOO much better, right??!?
please tell me this asshole is drunk or heavily drugged with whatever Rush is taking this week. please tell me he doesn't really believe the crap that's coming out of his mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
106. What is he talking about?
The donation form? I missed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #106
132. The Kerry website.
If you scroll down, after the petition for Rumsfeld to resign (275K signatures to date) is a 'donate' button.

Big whoop, Inhofe, you total piece of fundie shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
108. is Inhofe describing what WE did? or what Hussein did...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
112. Sen Inhope- anti-trivia speech..
anti-do gooders as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
115. IOW: we might have stuck a broomstick up your ass but we didn't dip you in
acid...so, what's the fuss"

Good gawds...Inhofe is a blithering idiot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
117. Can we get Inhofe's statements on the national news 24x7...
Pleeeeaaase.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
119. Human Rights do gooders?????!!!???
HEAVEN FORBID PEOPLE WHO FIGHT FOR THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF ALL HUMANS BE CONSIDERED HEROIC. This guy is a disgrace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:51 AM
Original message
Screw human rights !
Seems to be what he is saying??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
144. That's EXACTLY what this lunatic is saying!
He's so freakin offended that "human rights do gooders" would be going to the prisons to check for any signs of human rights abuses! I almost choked on my coffee when I heard that one.

What kind of alternate universe am I living in when HUMAN RIGHTS is considered a bad thing???

I need to leave this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ann Arbor Dem Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
121. Did Inhofe say..
He knows of no other American qualified to prosecute this war? Did I mishear?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oddman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
122. 7 7 7 7
Edited on Tue May-11-04 09:50 AM by Oddman
just 7 bad soldiers . . .

You stupid jerk . off Inhofe . . . You're really helping outrage the rest of the world with your ignorant, stupid, absurd comments . . .you are pathetic . . . just pathetic . . .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
124. Inhofe trying to save Rumsfeld
nothing else. this guy is revolting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
125. Who do I write to to impeach Inhofe? Bastard...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #125
134. John Warner now doing his soft shoe over the photos
they want to drown
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
127. Time to start thread 2 maybe? this one is getting big
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
129. Inhofe says there are only 7 (wrong-doers) what happens when it
is revealed that this was a systemic problem and HUNDREDS of soldiers may be involved?


failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
130. thread #2 please?
load getting slow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #130
140. Thread #2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oddman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
133. I am sooo f*cking disgusted by Inhofe
It boggles my mind that someone can be so totally ignorant . . .

It just boggles my mind . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #133
138. He has his own personal heros
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
137. Looks like "they were just following orders" is BULLSHIT! Thank you
SEN BYRD!!!!!


failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
139. In response to Byrd question, Taguba stated he found no order....
from higher up or at least no evidence of such order... a surprising answer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Failure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #139
142. Is Taguba lying or are the parents of Ms. England lying? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #142
143. thread #2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
147. Cambone has a nasty attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
149. Please continue in thread 2 here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC