Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WTF?? Taguba now says "they did it on their own"????...GTFOOH

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 06:42 PM
Original message
WTF?? Taguba now says "they did it on their own"????...GTFOOH
(get the f**k out of here)

His written report states abuse was systemic. His written report taken alongside the ICRC's reports about abuse and Seymour Hersh's reports and interviews -indicate a POLICY of torture.

Did the Bush fascists get to Taguba?

Hard to believe that untrained reserve soldiers in an undermanned unit understood enough about Arab culture to use photography to blackmail and shame potential insurgents for information.

As it turns out, up to 90% of the detainees at Abu Ghraib were innocent and wer ecaught up in the military raids and sweeps of neighborhoods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Link?
Where did he say this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Postman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. at the hearings today...
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. I heard the same thing on NPR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. This morning, after I heard that late last night The Pentagon....
(read Rumsfeld) insisted that he appear with two senior officials, I suspected it would be a very different Taguba that would testify. And it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. He did not say there were only this six people. But that the
lower level people did it on their own. But then one of the senators asked if he had interviewed the contractors and he said he had not been allowed to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I thought he said there was no direct evidence of someone ordering
lower level people to torture the POW's but that they may well have acted under someone's 'influence.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I think that your assessment is correct. What he meant by influence
is the key to the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. You know, someone mentioned that the 'lower level' people did not
have access to the particular wing of the prison where some of the torture was carried out - that wing was controlled by military intel and/or 'the contractors.'

I don't have a link for this - just recalled reading it somewhere in the last two days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Authoritiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Can't wait to hear Hersh's comments on Taguba's testimony.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
8. David Hackworth just said on CNN
Edited on Tue May-11-04 06:55 PM by Dudley_DUright
that he has a source that told him that Military Intelligence was making training films that outright said that the Geneva conventions did not have to be obeyed.

http://www.hackworth.com/

Direct link to article about MI source

http://www.sftt.org/cgi-bin/csNews/csNews.cgi?database=Hacks%20Target%20Feedback%202004.db&command=viewone&op=t&id=13&rnd=90.85378306639735
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Bingo! Thank you! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. It just keeps getting uglier and uglier
The pictures were taken as a way to intimidate the prisoner and then keep them working as low level collectors (if they did not the pictures would have been released to their family and tribes) Videos were also made as a way to record the "success" to be used as a teaching tool at Fort Huachuca (to train future interrogators). The MPs and Interrogators were told the Geneva Convention did not apply to Iraq Soldiers and Civilian Detainees. The methods the MPs used were actually taught to the MPs by military intelligence professionals and civilian contractors. This was a sanctioned operation and the methods were known to be used by Generals in the chain of command. Women MPs were sought out to further humiliate the Iraqi prisoners. The female MPs who accepted the jobs, conducted degrading acts upon the Iraq men, because such acts by women on men in the Arab culture are so humiliating, it was thought that the men would then talk just to stop the abuse by the female MPs. This abuse was done in stages and the less cooperative Iraqis were given the more degrading abuse to condition them to interrogation. The Major General (Barbara Fast) in charge of the MI personnel in Baghdad sanctioned this treatment... more

http://www.sftt.org/cgi-bin/csNews/csNews.cgi?database=Hacks%20Target%20Feedback%202004.db&command=viewone&op=t&id=13&rnd=719.0505541914532
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Col. Hackworth
also mentioned Gen. Barbara Fast as a key player. I think they are circling the wagons around Fast, because she is the link to the Whitehouse.
http://www.sptimes.com/2004/05/08/Worldandnation/Report_steers_clear_o.shtml
"The scant mention of Fast in the report is likely because Taguba was told to focus on the role of the military police, not military intelligence."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. hilarious- the GOP trying to reach beyond the grave...
Now you are instructed to think, act and speak as you have been directed to give testimony. The Truth? Are we finished as a free society?

It's depressing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. Maybe they were showing those films to certain troops 24/7 -
Perhaps these particular troops in the torture pictures were picked out of the crowd and used for fodder - shown the 'training films,' stoked up by being told they were doing the country's business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. It was based on what he found in a very short, limited, investigation
He was supposed to investigate one military unit at one prison, during a specific period of time. Nothing more, nothing less.

The Taguba report is being presented as if it was a thorough investigation of the whole system. Taguba can only confirm what he found within very narrowly defined parameters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Calico Jack Rackham Donating Member (410 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Exactly
Gen Toguba covered the MP side of the house. He did not investigate the intelligence community nor their chain of command. There is alot more to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. Here's what I think:
Edited on Tue May-11-04 06:58 PM by Junkdrawer
I think his superiors, over the last several days, have been debriefing him on exactly how he would testify. They probably were emphasizing that he stick to just what he found out and that he not speculate on any answer. In the course of this debriefing, they discovered exactly what questions could be expected to get the best answers from him. These questions were then fed to the Republicans on the committee.

The escort of senior officials was to insure his compliance and to "set the stage" - both superiors testified before him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. It was obvious as soon as Cambone and Smith opened their traps. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. If Taguba has ambition, he may be measuring what he says....
going higher than a 2 star general is very political.

Very, very political.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. They got to him. Beyond the SHADOW of a doubt. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-04 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. no he didn't i watch the entire hearings and he never said that......
Edited on Tue May-11-04 07:18 PM by ElsewheresDaughter
although i've heard it spun that way once today...now twice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC