Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

screen shot of Russert -- Palm Tree -- and transcript!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:20 PM
Original message
screen shot of Russert -- Palm Tree -- and transcript!
Edited on Sun May-16-04 12:22 PM by grasswire
By way of Drudge and the freepers, who captured it.



And here's the transcript:

TIM RUSSERT: Finally, Mr. Secretary, in February of 2003, you placed your enormous personal credibility before the United Nations and laid out a case against Saddam Hussein, citing.

(Camera moved off of interview subject)

EMILY MILLER, STATE DEPARTMENT PRESS AIDE: You're off.

SECRETARY POWELL: I am not off.

EMILY MILLER, PRESS AIDE: No. They can't use it, they're editing it.

SECRETARY POWELL: He's still asking the questions.

EMILY MILLER, PRESS AIDE: He was not ...

SECRETARY POWELL: Tim, I am sorry I lost you.

MR. RUSSERT: I am right here Mr. Secretary. I would hope they would put you back on camera. I don't know who did that.

EMILY MILLER, PRESS AIDE: He was going to go for another five minutes.

SECRETARY POWELL: We've really scre...

MR. RUSSERT: I think that was one of your staff Mr. Secretary. I don't think that's appropriate.

SECRETARY POWELL: Emily, get out of the way. Bring the camera back please. (Camera returns to the interview subject) I think we're back on Tim, go ahead with your last question.

MR. RUSSERT: Thank you very much, sir.

In February of 2003, you put your enormous personal reputation on the line before the United Nations and said that you had solid sources for the case against Saddam Hussein. It now appears that an agent called "Curve Ball" had misled the CIA by suggesting that Saddam had trucks and trains that were delivering biological chemical weapons.

How concerned are you that some of the information you shared with the world is now inaccurate and discredited?

SECRETARY POWELL: I'm very concerned. When I made that presentation in February 2003, it was based on the best information that the Central Intelligence Agency made available to me. We studied it carefully. We looked at the sourcing and the case of the mobile trucks and trains. There was multiple sourcing for that. Unfortunately, that multiple sourcing over time has turned out to be not accurate, and so I'm deeply disappointed.

But I'm also comfortable that at the time that I made the presentation it reflected the collective judgment, the sound judgment, of the intelligence community, but it turned out that the sourcing was inaccurate and wrong and, in some cases, deliberately misleading. And for that I'm disappointed, and I regret it.

MR. RUSSERT: Mr. Secretary, we thank you very much for joining us again and sharing your views with us today. SECRETARY POWELL: Thanks, Tim.

(END OF PRE-TAPE INTERVIEW)

MR. RUSSERT: AND THAT WAS AN UNEDITED INTERVIEW WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE, TAPED EARLIER THIS MORNING FROM JORDAN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AussieInCA Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. it's Bush!!! ROFL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. I like that "WTF?!" look on Timmy's face!
Nice weather they're having in Jordan, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. yeah, isn't that golden? ....... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. That moment crystalizes the entire Bush experience...


...dishonesty, radical behavior, secrecy, distraction, inappropriate power play -- all have become so typical over the last 3.5 years.

That moment on MTP really crystalizes the experience of living in America under George Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. I bet something like this has never happened to him in his many
years of doing interviews.

Has anyone heard what he has to say about this? He looks pissed off. I wonder if he is going to join the ranks of those who are jumping ship?

Does anyone know what his reaction is? Is he bashing anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AussieInCA Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. never in 13 years, said it on cnn late edition today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nashyra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Got to give Powell credit
he is really toast now, but if they dump Powell I think that the diplomatic corps will outwardly endorse Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. i give powell credit too
just have to say out loud. i am totally disappointed in the man, but glad he had enough integrity not to go with this play. and he didnt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. This certainly is a fine example of how the * administration operates
and it would be nice for him to point that out. It is obvious to Powell wasn't "staying on message" and they attempted to have his message edited out of the interview. I hope Russert grows a pair and tells the American people what this is all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. it sounds like he was on message
blame it all on the CIA. "We didn't lie, we had bad intelligence." That contradicts the reports of Powell calling the intelligence a bunch of shit, then spouting it anyway before the UN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. The view is way better looking than Powell.
Now I kinda agree with the move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Friends, I'm here to tell you ...
that was a very weird moment. Maybe not so much just by itself, but indicates the level of information control in this administration. The SECRETARY OF STATE is subject to being cutoff in mid-interview if the right propaganda message is not being transmitted. America under Bush is a scary place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Goebells = Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babzilla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. a chilling moment
it literally made my heart race.

At one point I was concerned that Powell would be dragged off to Gitmo.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. You know, one wonders...
I mean, Powell came out looking very good hear. He stood his aide down to answer a question "honestly," thus drawing a lot of attention to his answer. His answer was disengenuous and self-serving, though. All he said was he had bad information, and given what he had at the time, the decision was the right one. He blamed it all on the CIA, and thus cleared Bush.

Think about this line: "When I made that presentation in February 2003, it was based on the best information that the Central Intelligence Agency made available to me." Notice how he doesn't claim the CIA was fooled, or for that matter he doesn't claim that no one else gave him contradictory information. He doesn't even say "I didn't know the info was false." He could very well have known it was false, and his answer above would still be true.

Now, think about the CIA. They have just leaked info to Sy Hersch blasting Rumsfield and the Pentagon. Whoever is telling the truth in that debate, one thing is clear-- both sides are blaming the other for Abu Graib. Now Powell is blaming the CIA for Iraq. It's open war on the CIA by the White House.

And through it all, Powell is on Bush's team. Let's not praise him until he does something virtuous for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. In an open war on the CIA by the White House...
... bet on the CIA.

And Powell chose his words carefully -- about what was MADE AVAILABLE to him. In other words, he's linking the "best information" with a wink and a nod to "it's only what was made available to me, and there was other stuff they kept under lock and key."

Imagine if he weren't being minded by Emily Miller:

"When I made that presentation in February 2003, it was based on the best information that the Central Intelligence Agency made available to me. Unfortunately, their 'best' information had been filtered and tampered with by a rogue DOD unit controlled by Rumsfeld, Feith, and Wolfowitz, and was nothing but a sack of steaming camel pies given us by Ahmed Chalabi. And it may have been 'best' enough for George Tenet, but now we know that others in the intelligence community had far more accurate information that would in fact have greatly enhanced the chances that I could have resolved the matter diplomatically."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
28. Millions of people
saw Powell's presentation at the UN. Millions of people knew Powell's 'evidence' was a fraudulent attempt to sway people into accepting the invasion of Iraq. Looking back at his presentation shows just how inept and amateurish it was, a political cartoon. The drawings of the so-called chemical trucks, the vial, the Iraqi industrial installation showing absolutely no evidence of illegal operations. Pure garbage. Powell deserves no praise for going along with Bushco's conjured up reasons for invading Iraq. It is hard to understand why this man gets a pass for putting his personal political ambitions before integrity and the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. So what did Russert mean by this:
SECRETARY POWELL: We've really scre...

MR. RUSSERT: I think that was one of your staff Mr. Secretary. I don't think that's appropriate.

Was Russer berating Miller or Powell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. SECRETARY POWELL: We've really scre... wed up here.
Yep, big time, as Uncle Dick Cheney would say.
I think Russert was berating whoever touched that camera.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. Links to clips - broadband & dialup:
http://algraffix.nstemp.com/powellMTP.wmv <-high bandwidth (6MB Windows Media stream)

http://algraffix.nstemp.com/powellMTP.rm <-dial-up (600KB Real Media stream)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kanrok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Nice job, both posting and editing
Kudos. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. Nostalgia: "What am *I*--------a potted plant?!"
This Emily MILLER, from DeLAY *and* LAZIO.

Figures. Add to that her background in media------when THOSE go into bureaucracy as "media experts" they are self-important klutzes, have their small-head-media-hats on and screw up BADLY. Is she on suicide watch now?

********QUOTE********

.... Emily Miller, a former press secretary in the leadership office, has been named communications director to the majority whip, one of five changes in his press office.

Miller, who was press secretary to then-Rep. Rick Lazio (R-N.Y.), came to Capitol Hill from television news.

She had been an associate producer for ABC News’ “This Week” and “Good Morning America,” and a production assistant in NBC News’ Washington Bureau. A native of Baltimore, Miller is a graduate of Georgetown University. ....

********UNQUOTE******

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. also .spokesperson/Fl 2000 mob scene
That's how I felt watching Majority Whip Tom DeLay suddenly morph into a champion of protest marches and civil disobedience. "This was not a threatening band of armed thugs," said DeLay spokesperson Emily Miller, referring to the raucous demonstrators who stormed the Miami-Dade elections department. "They were idealistic, enthusiastic, young Republicans who felt they were being shut out."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
20. Poor, stupid Emily
she's going to be out of a job by the end of the day. She did more to make Powell look bad than any answer to any question he'd given in the interview. Perception is reality, and she made it look like Powell had something to hide-- and perhaps he does, but she certainly didn't make matters better by using thug tactics to stop an interview.

That tactic might have worked 18 months ago, but it's suicidal to try it now. The press is going to gnaw on that one for the next 2 weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
22. That transcript leaves out the part where Powell told Emily to..
Get out the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HFishbine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. No, it's there
SECRETARY POWELL: Emily, get out of the way. Bring the camera back please. (Camera returns to the interview subject) I think we're back on Tim, go ahead with your last question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
24. I missed this...but to listen to the leader of Jordan
and compare his work at bringing peace and the classy and cultured decorum he presents himself with to Powell and his history, plus this Miller person who possibly works for/has worked for DeLay makes an impression on me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
27. they're spinning it......oh my!!
State Department spokeswoman Julie Reside said Powell had scheduled five interviews one after another and that NBC went over the agreed upon time limit. She said every effort was made to get NBC to finish up, but that other networks had booked satellite time for interviews with Powell.

The executive producer of "Meet the Press," Betsy Fischer, said the exchange was not edited out because most taped interviews are not altered before airing.

She said Powell aide Emily Miller called right after the taping to "express her displeasure" that the interview ran long. Fischer also said Powell called Russert a few hours later to apologize.

The State Department would not confirm either call or that Miller was the aide addressed by Powell.


more at: http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/bw-exec/2004/may/16/05160707...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
29. The palm tree was a tad less disingenuous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
30. LMAO
even funnier when McCain tried to dodge the VP question by requesting that his camera go to a shot of a palm tree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. that dude is hilarious. Only sitting senator to host SNL
I love it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-16-04 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
31. "Send in the palms!"
Folks, I think we have another DU-ism. If a circus act screws up, the clowns are ready to take to the ring on a moment's notice. If a Bush official screws up, they go to a shot of palm trees.

Better verbiage might be "go to palm trees" or something like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC