|
I read on MSNBC that Powell chastised leaders in islamic countries for not doing enough to condemn the murder of Michael Berg, and comparing their reaction to muder to the U.S. torture of Iraqi prisoners. Is this a fair comparison? Afterall, I don't believe that any country sponsored this murder, unless someone can tell me otherwise. The murder strikes me as a an extremely heinous hate crime, rather than as a government sponsored actvity, like the U.S. torture. Note: If a government is found to have been connected to this murder, I think we should go after that government aggressively.
Then again maybe is Powell is right. Perhaps Bush, Powell, Rumsfeld, etc. should apologize everytime a hate crime is committed against a Muslim.
For example:
"In the Fort Worth-Dallas area, the slaying of a convenience store clerk in Mesquite and the fire-bombing of a Denton mosque were among the reported incidents of violence toward Arabs and Muslims.
Mark Stroman, 33, of Dallas, was sentenced to death in the Oct. 4, 2001 fatal shooting of Vasudev Patel, 49, an immigrant from India. Stroman, who remains on Death Row pending appeal, told a TV reporter that he killed the store clerk in a rage over the 9-11 attacks. Stroman was also linked to separate shootings of two Pakistani store clerks."
By Powell's logic, I guess we should expect Bush to harshly condemn this killing and explain that Stroman's actions do not reflect the Christian faith or the policies of the United States.
|