|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Tina H (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-04 08:33 AM Original message |
a thought about perjury developments in Martha case: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-04 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
1. I've heard it means that you're 90% sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tina H (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-04 09:05 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Reply |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warpy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-04 09:23 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Scotland's got the right idea |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tina H (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-04 09:28 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. yes Scotland allows jurors to express three levels of confidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snoggera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-04 09:33 AM Response to Reply #6 |
9. Not good for the US system |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tina H (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-04 09:40 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Maybe the prohibition of Double Jeopardy should be less than absolute. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snoggera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-04 09:54 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. The idea behind prohibition of double jeopardy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tina H (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-04 10:07 AM Response to Reply #12 |
14. the other side of this coin . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snoggera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-04 10:15 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. The choices |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-04 08:41 AM Response to Original message |
2. Good points. The perjury shows the intent of the prosecutors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-04 08:48 AM Response to Original message |
3. this is basically how oj walked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rooboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-04 08:56 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. I didn't watch the whole OJ saga... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snoggera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-04 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
7. Would a "reasonable" person conlude |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tina H (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-04 09:50 AM Response to Reply #7 |
11. I think you are getting into another area I think about: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snoggera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-04 10:06 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. A person should be found guilty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tina H (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-04 10:21 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. Oh, I think you oversimplify |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snoggera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-04 10:32 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. If a "reasonable" person |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tina H (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-22-04 10:44 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Back at ya! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC