Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What has the Pentagon's third man done wrong? Everything. Slate on Feith.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 02:00 PM
Original message
What has the Pentagon's third man done wrong? Everything. Slate on Feith.
Douglas Feith

What has the Pentagon's third man done wrong? Everything.

By Chris Suellentrop
Posted Thursday, May 20, 2004, at 3:56 PM PT


Of all the revelations that have surfaced about the Abu Ghraib prison-abuse scandal so far, the least surprising is that Douglas Feith may be partly responsible. Not a single Iraq war screw-up has gone by without someone tagging Feith-who, as the Defense Department's undersecretary for policy, is the Pentagon's No. 3 civilian, after Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz-as the guy to blame. Feith, who ranks with Wolfowitz in purity of neoconservative fervor, has turned out to be Michael Dukakis in reverse: ideology without competence.

It's not that the 50-year-old Feith is at fault for everything that's gone wrong in Iraq. He's only tangentially related to the mystery of the missing weapons of mass destruction, for example. (Though it's a significant tangent: An anonymous "Pentagon insider" told the Washington Times last year that Feith was the person who urged the Bush administration to make Saddam's WMD the chief public rationale for going to war immediately.) Nor was it Feith who made the decision to commit fewer troops than the generals requested. (Though Feith did give the most honest explanation for the decision, saying last year that it "makes our military less usable" if hundreds of thousands of troops are needed to fight wars.) But if he isn't fully culpable for all these fiascos, he's still implicated in them somehow. He's a leading indicator, like a falling Dow-something that correlates with but does not cause disaster.

Start with Abu Ghraib. Feith's office was in charge of Iraq's military prisons, but that's not the only reason his name keeps turning up in newspaper reports about the scandal. It was Feith who devised the legal solution for getting around the Geneva Conventions' prohibition on physically or psychologically coercing prisoners of war into talking. As a Pentagon official in the 1980s, Feith had laid out the argument that terrorists didn't deserve protection under the Geneva Conventions. Once the war on terrorism started, all he had to do was implement it. And even more damning than his legal rule-making is Feith's reported reaction to complaints by military Judge Advocate General lawyers about the new, looser interrogation rules. "They said he had a dismissive, if not derisive, attitude toward the Geneva Conventions," Scott Horton, a lawyer who was approached by six outraged JAG officers last year, told the Chicago Tribune. "One of them said he calls it 'law in the service of terror.' "

more
http://slate.msn.com/id/2100899


Bad Feith.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. I've been following him for a few years
he truly is bad to the core
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. ...'bout sums it up:
they were brilliant, and they were fools

That being said, who now pays for the misdeeds that Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz and Feith have brought upon this nation?

How can they be brought to justice? And, in a broader sense, exactly what would be justice for these people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. On what basis are they considered brilliant?
The neo-cons' ideas are horrible. Everything they do turns out to be a miserable failure. I just don't get why anyone considers them brilliant, or even very smart. Cheney, especially, I think is highly overrated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Maybe that they were able to fool most of the people
for some of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Neo-cons? Naive cons.
Empire by Dummies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. ...or, according to Tommy Franks...
"the fucking stupidest guy on the face of the earth."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I just love that quote from Franks.
"And while the Pentagon's assumptions of an ecstatic, sweets-and-flowers-bearing populace that would welcome the occupiers as liberators may have been understandable in February 2003, Feith continued to let ideology rule his decisions long after the "major combat operations" ended. Last September, Knight Ridder reported that Paul Bremer's request for more than 220 employees for the occupation had yet to be approved. Guess who was to blame? "It is taking forever because Feith only wants true believers to get through the gate," a senior administration official said."

This ties with the threads about the CPA recruiting Young Republicans etc through the Heritage Foundation. What a bunch of jerkoffs.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. But THANK GOD they're not politicizing this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks for posting
Except they got the role of the OSP wrong.

http://www.dissidentvoice.org/May2004/Lobe0520.htm

Here's some info on Feith, I hadn't realized that Karen Kwiatkowski was his deputy. If he as loathesome a creature as has been reported maybe that helped push her whistle blowing.

http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Douglas_Feith
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks - just copied your post to PNAC Links Archive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC