Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Victory for Free Speech: Bush Admin. Case Against Greenpeace Dismissed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 03:49 PM
Original message
Victory for Free Speech: Bush Admin. Case Against Greenpeace Dismissed
On April 12, 2002, two Greenpeace members boarded a ship about 6 miles from Miami, Florida. The ship was transporting illegal mahogany from the Brazilian Amazon. The protestors from Greenpeace were detained before they could unfurl a banner saying, “President Bush, Stop Illegal Logging."

The protestors spent the weekend in custody and two months later were sentenced to time served for boarding the ship without permission.

That should have been the end of that.

But 15 months later, Ashcroft’s Justice Department indicted Greenpeace itself, seeking to revoke Greenpeace’s tax-exempt status and force Greenpeace to report its activities to the government.

The indicted offense was “sailor-mongering,” from an 1872 law against boarding a ship to solicit sailors for brothels. The law hadn’t been used since 1890.

It’s dubious in terms of free speech for the government to bring out a law which hasn’t been used in over a hundred years to prosecute an organization which engages in protest.

Fortunately, on May 19, 2004, Judge Adalberto Jordan dismissed the case on a technicality.

The law says the ship must be “about to arrive” and Judge Jordan decided that 6 miles away isn’t close enough to shore for a ship to be “about to arrive.”

Greenpeace issued a statement on the dismissal:

"America's tradition of free speech won a victory today but our liberties are still not safe," said Greenpeace Executive Director John Passacantando. "The Bush administration and its allies seem bent on stifling our tradition of civil protest."

Read More at MOVELEFT.COM
http://www.moveleft.com/moveleft_essay_2004_05_23_victory_for_free_speech_bush_greenpeace_sailor.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. At last, some GOOD news
That story was really disturbing. It's good to know that there's still a vestige of justice left in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, at least the judge interpreted the statute fairly.
Yes, at least the judge interpreted the statute fairly.

The First Amendment implications weren't ruled on, but would have been awful.

I wrote about this story for my website because I felt like adding some good news to it.

MOVELEFT.COM
http://moveleft.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DaveSZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It was a Clinton appointed judge
Edited on Sun May-23-04 04:09 PM by DaveSZ
I'm pissed off as hell that the Senate Democrats are going to let Bush continue to pack the courts with his wacko judges.

He's already gained control of several of the Circuit Courts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thanks, I was wondering about that.
Thanks, I was wondering about that.

Is there one website which shows who appointed each federal judge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC