Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CAFTA being signed today

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-04 02:23 PM
Original message
CAFTA being signed today
Edited on Fri May-28-04 02:25 PM by redqueen
Did I hear that right?

Goldangit. I did.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/usnw/20040527/pl_usnw/oxfam__central_american_trade_bill_no_boon_for_the_poor__u_s__to_sign__cafta__trade_agreement112_xml

Oxfam: Central American Trade Bill No Boon for the Poor; U.S. to Sign 'CAFTA' Trade Agreement

Thu May 27,10:20 AM ET

To: National Desk
Contact: Lyndsay Cruz of Oxfam America, 202-460-0760

WASHINGTON, May 27 /U.S. Newswire/ -- On May 28, U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick will join officials from Costa Rica, El Salvador (news - web sites), Guatemala, Honduras and Nicaragua to sign the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA). While officials from Central America and the US toast the fruits of negotiations, more than 15 million Central Americans who live on less than $2 per day have nothing to celebrate.

"Trade has an important role to play in helping developing countries achieve economic growth and poverty reduction. But CAFTA will only hinder, not help the poor benefit from trade," said Stephanie Weinberg, trade policy advisor at Oxfam. "Under CAFTA, millions of small farmers in Central America will be unable to compete with US subsidized rice, corn, and beans, all of which are staple crops in Central America.

Since NAFTA went into effect in 1994, 15 million Mexican corn farmers have faced enormous hardship due to the drop in corn prices by 70 percent. This was largely due to the dumping of subsidized corn on the Mexican market by large US agribusinesses. NAFTA was supposed to benefit Mexico, but today, half of the rural Mexican population lives in extreme poverty.

In addition to agriculture, CAFTA will also have significant negative consequences for public health. The agreement will require Central American governments to impose very stringent patent protection on the production of pharmaceuticals, putting at risk the ability to manufacture affordable generic medicines. New rules under CAFTA will strengthen the rights of patent holders, yet limit competition by generics producers, giving pharmaceutical companies a stranglehold on the drugs market.

(snip)

------
For more information, please contact Lyndsay Cruz at 202-460-0760 or via email at lcruz@oxfamamerica.org

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IrateCitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-04 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's not expected to pass Congressional ratification
From what I've heard, all House Democrats are pretty much united against it because it contains absolutely ZERO labor or environmental protections. Also, many Republicans from textile, orange or sugar producing regions will likely vote against it out of fear of losing their jobs otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-04 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. thank you, IC
I was about to have an effing heart attack over here. Wondering how this could happen without a peep from the hill.

Bless you! Have a fantastic weekend!

:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-04 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, but I don't think it'll pass Congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-04 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-28-04 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. WSJ reports that Dems say no way it will pass. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC