Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jessica Lynch POW / Abortion Rights Hypothetical

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
republicansarewhores Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 02:42 PM
Original message
Poll question: Jessica Lynch POW / Abortion Rights Hypothetical
Edited on Sat May-29-04 02:45 PM by republicansarewhores
Here's an interesting question.

Had Private Lynch gotten pregnant from the POW rape incident, do you think the neo-cons would have expected her to carry the child to term or allowed her the opportunity to control her own body?

I'd love to see this tossed this into the arena when they talk about restricting a woman's right to choose and reversing Roe v. Wade. I'd love to see a journalist or reporter toss this grenade into the neo cons laps when being interviewed and see how they would respond to this hypothetical if it were to effect someone they were using as a propaganda tool while expecting everyone else to live by a different standard and judgement.

RAW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. I picked option 1, because I feel that most RWers are pro-choice
but they are so goddam dumb that THEY DON'T EVEN KNOW IT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senior citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Option 2

When you need more cannon fodder, it doesn't matter where it comes from or how you get it. It is just disposable cannon fodder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosophy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wait...wasn't the rape story made up?
Like most of the other "heroic" facts of the incident?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jjmalonejr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. I prefer to leave Jessica Lynch alone to live her life...
...and not speculate about this kind of stuff.

Just because the RW uses her as a propaganda tool is no reason for us to do the same.

Ditto Pat Tillman. Both served their country honorably and dragging them into political debate makes me queasy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rationality Donating Member (752 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. I thought I'd never see this correlation again
When the media was actually paying attention to Lynch, I saw an idiot on another forum use Lynch to say what could've happened over there had she been aborted by her mother in some extremely assanine attempt to make a pro-life statement. I'm dissapointed to see a DUer exploit her even if it's for a pro-choice argument. I find this tactic repugnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
republicansarewhores Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Sorry you see it this way. it's not a tactic. It's a question.
And even if it is politically charged, why don't people want to offer their opinions since the law in question should not be selectively enforced whichever direction it ends up going in?

I may have editorialized my thoughts before asking everyone else's opinion, but that doesn't discount or support other people's views.

RAW
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. ...and someday we will all leave Jessica alone...
She has been through enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. Keep in mind that
these people think a ten year old pregnant because her father raped her has no right to an abortion. For them, the fetus always takes precedence over the woman. Or in some cases, girl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. None of the above.
1. If Lynch had gotten pregnant and decided to carry the fetus to term, the RW would have hailed her as a Great American Hero(ine) all over again, and used her as a pawn (all over again), this time to champion the overturn of Roe v. Wade. (Extra-added RW bonus: More "Iraqis-are-godless-thugs" fodder.) Resulting progeny would become poster child for anti-choice brigades, been sent to "faith-based" school at taxpayers' expense, received college fund on day of birth, appeared in regular National Enquirer updates ("Lynch Nightmare Rape Baby Takes First Step!" ... "'Iraqis Evil, Bush God,' sez America's Favorite War Baby" ... "New Photos: Jessie's Girl Is All Grown Up!") -- and finally get so screwed up, s/he would become drug-addicted, homeless, and/or kills self.

2. If Lynch had gotten pregnant and decided to have an abortion, any RWers who knew about it would have shut up about it, and, later, when the story came out, would have denied it as LW propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. A Legitimate Question
Millions of women "don't want to be dragged into this debate", but if the right-wing maniacs and Christian Taliban get their way, they will be, whether they like it or not, right? If you want to get pissed off, go read the American Life League's position on "Why Rape and Incest are NO EXCUSE!... I mean, yeah, Jessica Lynch shouldn't be dragged into the debate. Neither should a 12 year old incest victim. When the fundamentalists stop trying to insert the boot of federal law into the private choices of women, then it won't be up for discussion anymore, will it?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC