Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Flashback: JFK's Alliance for Progress (Latin America)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-04 09:53 PM
Original message
Flashback: JFK's Alliance for Progress (Latin America)
I find it interesting how 'radical', and 'far left' and even 'socialist' some of these ideas (especially land reform) are labeled now-a-days, even by Democrats.

http://www.encyclopedia.com/html/A/AlliancP1ro.asp
U.S. assistance program for Latin America begun in 1961 during the presidency of John F. Kennedy . It was created principally to counter the appeal of revolutionary politics, such as those adopted in Cuba (see Fidel Castro ). It called for vast multilateral programs to relieve the continent's poverty and social inequities and ultimately included U.S. programs of military and police assistance to counter Communist subversion. The charter of the alliance, formulated at an inter-American conference at Punta del Este, Uruguay, in Aug., 1961, called for an annual increase of 2.5% in per capita income, the establishment of democratic governments, more equitable income distribution, land reform, and economic and social planning. Latin American countries (excluding Cuba) pledged a capital investment of $80 billion over 10 years. The United States agreed to supply or guarantee $20 billion. By the late 1960s, however, the United States had become preoccupied with the Vietnam War, and commitments to Latin America were reduced. Moreover, most Latin American nations were unwilling to implement needed reforms. The Organization of American States disbanded the permanent committee created to implement the alliance in 1973.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-04 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nixon-Kissinger-Reagan-Bush-Bush (even Carter a little bit) .
It's amazing how much things have changed.

Perhaps the Soviet threat was the thing that made Americans feel like they had to do something for the people of these countries, and the end of the soviet threat meant that Wall St could rip these countries off completely.

Another thing worth noting: Kennedy ran as an anti-communist. He ran to the right of Nixon on foreign policy. However, Aliance for Progress was hardly right wing (and Nixon showed us just how far right right could be).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-04 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Oh yeah. Definitely no mistaking him for a Communist.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC