Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Peter Camejo Organizes Green Party Support For Nader

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Solidarity Donating Member (518 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:04 PM
Original message
Peter Camejo Organizes Green Party Support For Nader


SF Frontlines.com
June 1, 2004


"Nader is by far the strongest peace candidate that the Greens can support in the upcoming election. Nader has done a tremendous job over the last eight years in helping to build the Green Party. While we would prefer that Nader would accept an outright nomination, supporting Ralph in the 2004 Presidential election is the best way to ensure that the issues we are concerned about are part of the Presidential debate," --Peter Camejo


Greens from throughout the United States announced today they will seek the endorsement of Ralph Nader for President at the upcoming Green Party national convention June 24-27 in Milwaukee.

The group, Greens for Nader, also hopes that Nader will select a Prominent Green member as his vice-presidential running mate in light of Nader's historical ties to the Greens and the Greens' status as the third largest party in the country. Camejo has a large bloc of favorite son delegates from California pledged to him going to the Green Party's June 24-27 convention in Milwaukee. All the announced Green candidates for President in the Green Party are leaning towards a Nader endorsement except David Cobb.

"Throughout the Bush administration, we have seen the Democrats join the Republicans in launching wars, cutting taxes for the rich, and curtailing civil liberties. We need to defeat not only Bush, but the Bush policies the Democrats have also embraced. For example, Nader is the only high-profile candidate with a real jobs program. Bush wants to cut personal income taxes and Kerry wants to cut corporate income taxes, both of them hoping for an indirect trickle-down economic stimulation to create jobs. Nader calls for repealing the Bush tax cuts for the rich and investing the restored revenues in public works that directly create living-wage jobs in infrastructure renewal and public services," said Howie Hawkins, a Teamster and Green congressional candidate in Syracuse, New York.

http://www.sf-frontlines.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=709&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0&POSTNUKESID=c8550873812b31b939c9d846ebe16aa7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Karl Rove will be cheering him on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Tuning Out Nader
is all I can think to do for now. He was such a help last election.
I can not see him adding value now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Did the check from Arnold clear yet?
Edited on Tue Jun-01-04 04:20 PM by robbedvoter
Was this a thread meant for a flame war? lile throwing feces around DU?
Who cares? In case you didn't notice this is a place supporting Kerry. Democratic Underground that is. Buh-bye now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Oh... that's right! This is DemocraticUnderground.
I'm not sure what it was, but for an instant it felt a lot like FreeRepublic...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Read the rules, robbed.
Edited on Tue Jun-01-04 04:30 PM by DemsUnite
I believe accusing one of being a freeper is a no-no.

Not the best of debate techniques, either...

(on edit:typo)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. You are not a freeper, just working for the same ultimate goals
And I don't intend to debate you. Nader must be your religion. Logic wouldn't work on you if 3 and 1/2 years of W didn't make a dent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Whew!
"And I don't intend to debate you."

Whether you believe it or not, I am not your "enemy," robbedvoter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
33. You have to simplify things for the Nader Haters
they see in black and white only.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Exactly, Camejo was instrumental in making sure the recall had enough sigs
Green party members need to 'splain how they can keep hurting the people they claim to want to help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Kerry on Unions:
http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/workers/

John Kerry has a 90 percent AFL-CIO voting record over an 18-year Senate career. He has fought to raise the minimum wage, cosponsored bills to outlaw striker replacement and provide workers with Family and Medical Leave to spend time with a new child or care for a family member. He has helped beat back Republican efforts to gut OSHA, weaken worker safety rules and cut funds from worker training and employment programs. And he has fought for workers’ right to organize in his home state of Massachusetts, including SEIU workers in Boston, and UFCW and CWA workers throughout the state. He’s also supporting UAW organizers seeking to organize in Worcester.

John Kerry believes that the card check and neutrality system is the most fair and equitable way for employees to establish their desire to form a union and for employers to recognize the union and begin negotiations. John Kerry has strongly supported the right to organize for many Massachusetts workers. John Kerry supported SEIU Local 254 in their efforts to organize janitors in the Boston area, UFCW Local 791 in their efforts to organize the Star Market employees in the 43 stores in Massachusetts, UFCW Local 1445 in their efforts to organize the employees of Kayem Foods in Chelsea, and CWA Local 1365 in their efforts to organize the employees of Lucent Technology. Kerry also worked with Polaroid retirees to recover benefits that were lost as a result of the Polaroid bankruptcy filing. John Kerry is supporting UAW workers at the Sainte Gobaine plant in Worcester who have not been able to get their first contract due to the union busting tactics of the company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Union support means jack these days
Ask Dean and Geppy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. or ask Kerry who won the union votes
and it does mean something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solidarity Donating Member (518 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Camejo Respected By Progressives
I believe progressive people should be given a fair shake and not be the targets of endless lies, distortions, misrepresentations, slanders and outright character assassination, especially from other progressives and liberals! And that includes Green Party candidates and supporters! Is that unreasonable?

I haven't read those kinds of personal mud slinging attacks and slanders directed against John Kerry by Green Party or Ralph Nader supporters on DU. And if any Greens and/or Nader supporters out of frustration are thinking about conducting such slander campaigns they should backoff! Nothing positive can happen when well-intentioned progessive people engage in such attacks against our own.

Peter Camejo has a great deal of respect among most progressive and liberal activists in California be they Green or Democratic Party supporters. People were impressed with his campaigns for governor and how he handled himself in debates, sticking to the issues and presenting his views effectively without lowering himself to personal smears and outright slanders.

Camejo is also the most effective speaker and skilled debator I have ever heard in my life ..... and I've heard many.

And robbedvoter: Cut the freeper b.s. Right-wing baiting and red-baiting won't cut it with true progressives. Such baiting is designed to curtail discussion and debate among liberals and other progressives, not encourage it. If you can't debate and discuss differences of opinion why do you post here? This is a discussion board, not an insult board.

PETER CAMEJO ADDRESSES PROGRESSIVE ELECTION FORUM

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Camejo has earned a place in CA politics. That said, I feel he's
being opportunistic in his support of Nader. Not a bad thing in and of itself, it's politics. But I think he's wrong in giving his support to Nader. And shortsighted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
32. no one who is supporting Nader should be respected by anyone except for
the Bushies

if the Greens really want to beat Bush, they should support Kerry and not that egotistical jackass Nader

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. All of a sudden, the Naderites don't like unions
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Naderite? Hardly.
For the record, I think Kerry's work with the Unions is admirable. Especially the work he has done with firefighters.

What I question is the loyalty and/or general influence of unions to a progressive agenda concerning worker's rights. (Take Hoffa, for instance.) If a guy like Gephardt, who is supposedly THE Dem union icon, can't make it passed the first-round of the primary sweepstakes, the union vote has lost it's bite.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. the unions voted for kerry
and kerry won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solidarity Donating Member (518 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Be Careful!
You'd better be careful about what you write. It looks like some people here don't like to be questioned. If you don't want to be red-baited, called a "Naderite", a Green or even a "freeper" you probably shouldn't post your thoughts here. Unless you can handle an avalanche of personal insults and attacks.

As a progressive union man and retired union organizer I can take personal attacks. I had to deal with all kinds of personal attacks from the employers and their right-wing union busting agents for years. I just didn't experience that sort of thing from people who considered themselves progressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Oh, the passive aggressive routine again - throwing feces then
complaining that we open the umbrellas...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. LOL!!!
Good one. Mind if I borrow it for future use?

Eh, don't answer that. I'm taking it anyway. It's too good to be polite about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. Gee that's funny, labor union czars in California just gave their blessing
Edited on Tue Jun-01-04 05:29 PM by nothingshocksmeanymo
to one of the most anti-worker laws ever passed in the state...how progressive can they be? Look up SB 866...but I see, Dems are the problem...right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solidarity Donating Member (518 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. More Mud Please!
And soon someone will claim that Nader and the Greens are racists who especially hate Arabs! It doesn't matter that Ralph Nader is an Arab-American. Nader hates all Arabs and wants the occupation of Iraq to continue. And Peter Camejo really has it in for Spanish people. Never mind the fact that Camejo is Hispanic. Don't ask anyone to prove those claims. Just take their word for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Who started the thread? Did you expect roses like W in Iraq?
Then you are just as astute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solidarity Donating Member (518 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. No Roses Please
Edited on Tue Jun-01-04 05:19 PM by Solidarity
Don't throw roses. Perhaps you should consider responding to the newspaper article if you don't agree with it.

Did you notice something in this thread? So far not a single poster has expressed any disagreement with the content of the newspaper article. Nothing! A big fat ZERO!

I can only conclude that the flamers (or whatever they are called) are incapable of challenging the views and opinions of Green Party leaders quoted in the article. Astonishing!

Well, so much for democratic discussion. Another flame please, unless you have some opinions and thoughts you'd like to present.
And if your views don't agree with the comments of the Green leaders in the article that would be just great!

But please, write something that goes beyond calling Camejo and Nader nasty names.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. some brief criticisms:
"The group said it will be mutually beneficial for these candidates to work cooperatively with the Nader candidacy."

I think the Greens for Nader folks are shooting themselves in the foot.


"Nader calls for repealing the Bush tax cuts for the rich and investing the restored revenues in public works that directly create living-wage jobs in infrastructure renewal and public services," said Howie Hawkins, a Teamster and Green congressional candidate in Syracuse, New York."

"Repealing the tax cuts for the rich" is the Democratic stand, in fact, it is the Democratic language for the issue. Kerry supports raising the minimum wage which would have a more immediate effect, imho, than a public works program, to help provide living wages for American workers.

lastly. from the Kerry platform:

End Every Single Tax Credit That Gives Corporations Breaks for Moving Jobs Offshore.

John Kerry will close every single loophole that gives companies incentives to move jobs abroad, including stopping American companies from setting up virtual headquarters in foreign countries just to avoid paying U.S. taxes and stop tax breaks for companies that move jobs abroad.

http://www.johnkerry.com/issues/economy/outsourcing.html

thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. Well..Mexicans certainly were scapegoated during the Cali recall
and if Camejo had not encouraged those petitions to be signed for the recall to qualify...er...um... you know...but just keep mouthing off about how being a Green means you are just the purest and most progressive of the land...we'll all just disregard the consequences in 2000 and during the California recall...and pretend you really want to help the little guy as he get REAMED UP THE ass one more time by Camejo helping Arnold to get elected and Nader helping Bush.

BTW...Nader is SOOO fucking progressive and in support of a living wage, that he blocked the union from his own business and DIDN'T pay his staff a living wage....that's "academic" progressivism for you...in "theory" he is a God...in reality...he's a lying hypocritical sack of shit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. thanks, nothingshocksmeanymore, Camejo played his position in CA
poorly in the recall fiasco. Well, not poorly - I'm a too well practiced diplomat - it sucked. So many liberal, progressive, moderate political folks here in CA lined up to participate in a "people power" recall which would only have one outcome, a Republican governor...'cause they didn't like Davis, who was not the architect of the energy scam disaster in the first place...and 'cause they could. That's not responsible politics, or even astute politics. That's vanity politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Good term for it.
When one's so called principles keep resulting in disaster, are they really principles or misguided impulses based on unrealistic fantasies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
24. Camejo says we need to defeat Bush,
but also the Democrats... excuse me, but there seems to be some major cognitive dissonance here. The only way these two opposing goals can come about is if Ralph Nader wins the election, and I've yet to meet a single Green or Nader supporter that sees that as possible.

It seems to me that Camejo (and it's looking like the Green majority) see keeping the Green Party on the ballot as more important than beating Bush.

It will also likely drive any moderating influences out of the ranks. A good old fashioned purge!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
28. Then he's an idiot
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
30. Good gosh.
It is amazing how instrumental radical liberals have been and are being in the republican takeover of this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John_H Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
34. and Rummy, Ashcroft, Karl, and chimp say go sucker go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solidarity Donating Member (518 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-04 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. It's Time For DLC'ers To Play : "Pass The Buck!"
And I thought Gore's failure to get easily elected was all the fault of the DLC and other leaders of the Democratic Party. Oh, the Supreme Court had nothing to do with the 2000 election theft either!
And of course Nader was totally responsible for the failure of Al Gore to win even his home state!

What time is it? Howdy Doody Time? No. It's pass the buck time!

Blame the success of the right-wing on Nader, Peter Camejo and while your at it Michael Moore.

If Kerry is unable to easily win this election it's Naders fault!

The fact that Kerry so far has been reluctant to call for the withdrawl of U.S. forces from Iraq, has refused to defend our Constitution from attacks under laws such as the Patriot Act, supports so-called "free trade" laws that have undermined workers here and abroad ..... "little things" like that will have no bearing on this election. It would be Nader's fault if Kerry fails to lead and act like a leader who represents working people and progressives from all classes in this nation.

John Kerry should be able to win this election in a landslide no matter what Ralph Nader does or doesn't do.

But, if Kerry should lose, let's pass the buck and do as DLC leaders are already doing. Blame Nader! Joseph Lieberman has already attacked Nader, perhaps all "progressives" should follow his lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC