Kerry is a Vietnamese Communist Hero, it's true, would I lie to you?

Posted today on the brainless (and increasingly sparsely populated) UK Sterling Times/ Anglosphere Freeper wannabee website.

A Ho Chi Minh City museum that honors Vietnam war protesters features a photograph of Sen. John Kerry being greeted by the general secretary of the Communist Party, Comrade Do Muoi.

A snapshot of the display in the Vietnamese Communist War Remnants Museum – formerly known as the "War Crimes Museum" – was acquired over the weekend by Jeffrey M. Epstein of Vietnam Vets for the Truth, a group opposing Kerry's campaign for the presidency.


Vietnam veteran Bill Lupetti took this photograph of a display at a Ho Chi Minh City museum honoring war protesters.

Posted today by a Freeper idiot on Sterling Times/Anglosphere, arguably the dumbest right-wing site in the world


The snapshot of the display, which depicts a July 1993 meeting, was forwarded to Epstein by Bob Shirley, one of more than 200 members of Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth who signed an open letter questioning Kerry's fitness to serve as commander-in-chief.

Epstein said the picture of the display was taken by Bill Lupetti, a Swift Boat Veteran who currently is visiting Vietnam.

Epstein said the display photograph's "unquestionable significance lies in its placement in the American protesters' section of the War Crimes Museum" in Ho Chi Minh City, the former Saigon.

"The Vietnamese communists clearly recognize John Kerry's contributions to their victory," he said. "This find can be compared to the discovery of a painting of Neville Chamberlain hanging in a place of honor in Hitler's Eagle's Nest in 1945."

Below the display photograph are explanatory placards in English, French, Vietnamese and Chinese.

Continues ...

http://www.websitetoolbox.com/tool/post/sterlingtimes/vpost?id=2358&trail=15#1

Where the hell did they get this one from?

The Skin

Gorbachev has photos of himself smiling and shaking hands with Ronald Reagan.

...oh, never mind.

..Worked with the CIA to help fight the Japanese during WWII. He then declared an independent Vietnam in 1945 quoting liberally from the declaration of independence and Thomas Jefferson. We thanked him for his help by turning his newly liberated country (sorry, "colonial possession") back over to the French, who's rectii we had just saved. But they couldn't get there right away, so we let the Japanese, who he had just helped us defeat, administer Vietnam in their 'stead until the French could get back.

What's my point? You know, the right is obviously going to blow a gasket over John Kerry being against the vietnam war (after he bravely fought in it) but I think that if they really want to open up the vietnam debate, with some genuine discussion of what really went down in that war (does that ever happen? well, a man can dream) it'll only backfire on them.

Whaleshit is at the bottom of the ocean and they are lower than that...

Why doesn't the article mention the reason for the July 1993 meeting?
Could it have been to reestablish relations with Vietnam?
Maybe it was to ask the Vietnamese to account for the MIA's?
See, they are careful not to let you know the purpose of the 1993 photo. Where the photo is placed in the museum has no relevance without explanation of why it is in the museum in the first place.
A newsworthy article would also include the text that accompanies the photo.

Just something to think about.

that one guy leading a Swift boat (with what a crew of 8-10 guys) singlehandedly handed the victory over to the North Vietnamese?

If Kerry had that much power to sway the course of that war - he deserves to be president. Just think what he could with a whole country behind him and not just a little boat.

I'm pissed I even had to read it to see what it was about, and I don't know why it needed to be posted here.

Quoting:
"The English placard reads: "Mr. Do Muoi, Secretary General of the Vietnamese Communist Party met with Congressman and Veterans Delegation in Vietnam (July 15-18, 1993)"

Epstein's group says the exhibit refutes Kerry's insistence his antiwar protests did not render support to the enemy in time of war.

"The Vietnamese communists clearly feel that the American antiwar protestors were a very important force in undermining support in the United States for American war efforts, a force that contributed materially to ultimate communist victory in 1975," the group said in a statement.

Epstein's group certainly reads a whole hell of a lot into that innocuous caption, don't you think?

As for what John Kerry was doing in Vietnam in '93, he was doing a lot more than Messrs. Epstein and Shirley trying to get resolution on MIA cases from the Vietnamese.
From a July 1, 1993 floor speech by Senator Kerry:

”It is my personal belief that the President keeps greater faith with the families of this country by guaranteeing that our team on the ground in Vietnam can have access in Vietnam , by guaranteeing that we will continue to have archival research access, that we will continue to have oral history access by virtue of a two-way street, a cooperative process between Vietnam and ourselves.
Another argument made frequently by those who say `do not go forward,' Mr. President, is that they say we are not getting results. They say Vietnam is not cooperating. Mr. President, I respectfully disagree. Let me describe the actual record of cooperation and results.

When I made the first of some seven trips to Vietnam in the course of the last 2 years, we had no permanent office in Hanoi or in Vietnam . We had no permanent American servicemen assigned to Vietnam on a permanent basis of searching for the remains or for answers to questions about POW's. We had no archival research. We had no oral histories or interviews of major personalities within their prison system or military. We had no access to the provinces of their country and their villages for their tradition houses and museums. At that time, we had not been in their military headquarters, or many of their base camps, or other military camps around the country. We had zero access to their prison system.
We had no live-sighting follow-up. We were receiving reports of live Americans in Vietnam . We did not have the capacity to go out into the countryside and check on the live-sighting reports. Countless activist group after countless activist group came to me, and others, and said, `The Vietnamese are hiding something. They will not let us go out into the countryside and follow up in order to determine whether or not there are in fact Americans alive.' That was a legitimate issue, a legitimate question, as were all of the other issues we were raising.

Mr. President, where are we today, for those who say no results? After 18 years of waiting, within the span of about a year and a half, we have been in every single tradition house and museum in their country. We now have a full-time archive in Hanoi itself, where Americans and Vietnamese are working side by side over documents. How many documents? We received more than 18,000 artifacts, more than 2,000 photographs, and more than 3,500 documents. Some of those documents have in fact given us the answers of what happened to individual servicemen that we still had questions about. That is a result, a concrete result.

<snip>
In addition to that, we now have a permanent office in Hanoi. We have over 100 Americans once again working in Hanoi, working in the countryside of Vietnam , Vietnamese and Americans, side by side, working together to excavate sites, to interrogate people, to try to find clues about missing Americans.”
http://www.seanrobins.com/kerry/kerry_senate_1993_07_01.htm

Spare us this crap, could you please?

... you'll have seen that I asked if people knew where the original source had got it from. Sorry, but the Right-Wingers here - and not just the right wingers - are desperate for this kind of dirt on Kerry and I'm just as desperate to refute it.

I'm sorry I offended you. If you wish, I'll seek your permission before posting in future.

The Skin: :spank: :spank:

You posted a freeper propaganda post, from a freeper propaganda board, instead of just a link and a brief description. This method naturally forces people to read the freeper propaganda whether they wish to or not.
Now I take it you're scolding me because I questioned why you did that.
Allow me to assist you then.

"If you read to the end of the post you'll have seen that I asked if people knew where the original source had got it from."

Now, from the freeper propaganda you posted:

Step 1
"Posted today by a Freeper idiot on Sterling Times/Anglosphere, arguably the dumbest right-wing site in the world"
You include a link to arguably the dumbest right-wing site in the world. :puke:

Step 2
Click on link. Go to freeper propaganda board. Read same thing you've posted here. Freeper poster has supplied link to WorldNetDaily. :puke:

Step 3
Click on link. Go to WND. Find same thing you posted here. :puke:

Step 4
Reread your post.
"The snapshot of the display, which depicts a July 1993 meeting, was forwarded to Epstein by Bob Shirley, one of more than 200 members of Swift Boat Veterans for the Truth who signed an open letter questioning Kerry's fitness to serve as commander-in-chief.

Epstein said the picture of the display was taken by Bill Lupetti, a Swift Boat Veteran who currently is visiting Vietnam."

In summary, and in answer to your question,
Lupetti took the picture while "visiting Vietnam".
Lupetti gave the picture to Shirley.
Shirley gave it to Epstein.
Epstein added the propaganda and sent it on to the various a**hole "veterans"* against Kerry groups.
WorldNetDaily, Freeperepublic, Sterling Times/Anglosphere, et al. disseminated it from there.

From whence you thoughtfully dropped it on the doorstep here.

That is how this s**t spreads.

Thank you for the tour through hell to answer your question. :puke:

*"Swftboat Vets For The Truth" actually only has one forum for "veterans only". And that's any veteran, any branch of service, anytime. They don't even require proof of service to post in that. It's just a front whose name is as much propaganda as its message.
It should instead be called "A Bunch Of Freeper Dorks Who Joined A Board Called *Swiftboat Vets For The Truth"

somewhat before 1993.

Maybe they should change the name of their group to "Slow-Boats."