Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Venezuela and Touch Screen voting (A bizzarre story)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 07:35 AM
Original message
Venezuela and Touch Screen voting (A bizzarre story)
A company hired to help deliver voting results in the recall referendum against Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez announced Friday it will buy back the government's shares in the firm -- a move meant to deflect criticism that the government's investment was a tool to manipulate the election.

The announcement by software maker Bizta Corp. comes amid an escalating uproar in Venezuela over the reliability and trustworthiness of the ''touch-screen'' voting machines, purchased in February for $91 million. The machines have never been used in an election anywhere.

28 PERCENT

The Herald reported last month that the government purchased a 28 percent stake in Bizta, through a venture capital fund, in June 2003 -- just a few months before the company bid for the elections contract.

''They were caught. We discovered the fraud and now they are covering it up,'' said Ernesto Alvarenga, an opposition congressman. ``We still have to be careful. All of this is related to the electronic fraud that they are trying to achieve.''
http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/8905053.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ideally, the gov't should have 100% control over the "company" counting...
...votes, or you'd be giving over control of your elections to a private company.

I'd rather the people were in control that a private company.

Significantly, these machines print out a ballot, which the voter reviews for accuracy and then dropps in a ballot box. The machines count the vote instantaneously and there is a paper trail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftistagitator Donating Member (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-04 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'm sure thats the "problem" for the opposition
They wanted Diebold
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC