Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why do they insist on "core inflation" indicators?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 06:09 PM
Original message
Why do they insist on "core inflation" indicators?
they don't include energy costs, and what else

for example, Lehrer/Bush shill Gwenn Ifil just said, that the core rate of inflation only increased .2 percent last month, as opposed to the .6 percent everybody else is quoting

what's the deal with that? does that mean we get to go back to the gas stations, the grocery stores, the drug stores, etc., and get out money back for those items?

who do they think they're kidding?

huh?

hahaha......now they're doing a story on Greenspan, who should be wearing an orange jumpsuit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. The justification is that energy and food are too volatile
The two rapidily change due to circumstances that do not accurately reflect consumer prices.

It sounded like bull the first time I heard that crap, and it still does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. zackly.....they're BSing about this very thing on Lehrer
claiming inflation picking up only gradually

right

like THIRTY THREE PERCENT increase in gas prices since december?

cheese up 93 percent

milk up over 100 percent

they mentioned that gas prices might spill over into the rest of the economy, then ignored it, while bullishing up on the economy

MIGHT spill over?

why don't you get some BALANCE on there, you dicks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayavarman Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm not sure
But I would get nervous if the metrics by which inflation were measured were messed around with too much. . . . . If inflation had been measured that way for decades, lets stick with it because it allows us to measure trends & compare 'apples to apples' when looking at economic cycles, etc . . .

I agree, though that it doesn't seem right- especially when most families buy food & gas alot more often than other things like cars, etc . . .

When it comes to big things like the census, the economy, environmental issues . . . . I'd rather the powers that be not change yardsticks!

If gov't changed the way they measure inflation you know it would be changed in order to manipulate the data politically. . . . Just like this guy on TV was attempting to do

Just my 2 cents
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. good point, but that's like saying we should maintain the idea
that the earth is the center of the solar system

their sanguine interpretation of the way things are going, inflationwise, is ridiculous

the effects of the drastic gas price increase won't be felt for awhile, as they ripple through the ENTIRE economy

look what it's doing to the airline industry, for just one example

trucking is another
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayavarman Donating Member (319 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-15-04 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I see your point
I wonder if they could retroactively redo all of the historical inflation data as well to include food & energy . . . .

That would be fine in my book
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hammie Donating Member (413 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
6. It dampens out swings based on energy prices
In the long run, energy is accounted for in the price of everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egalitarian Donating Member (379 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 01:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. Are housing costs included in this "core" data?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-04 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. Because raising interest rates will not stamp out inflation
caused by high energy prices.

It is more useful for the Fed to see what underlying inflation exists in the economy without the affects of often volatile food and energy prices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC