Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anyone have any notion what embeds had to agree to to get access?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 07:38 PM
Original message
Does anyone have any notion what embeds had to agree to to get access?
Edited on Fri Jun-18-04 07:40 PM by Paragon
Is there ANY documentation (or even speculation) on this?

Michael Moore managed to get his hands on pretty inflammatory embed footage through freelancers and such -- so what else did embeds see and film in Iraq and Afghanistan, and can they talk about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Paging William Pitt...
Come in, William Pitt...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjornsdotter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. No idea
but a hell of a good question. I'll try to find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Write! Write! Write!
Even if you come up with nothing (which is what I would suspect), a truthout article just posing the question might be helpful.

I don't recall reading ONE article or seeing ONE TV report on this - which, considering most mainstream venues had embeds, isn't that surprising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graham67 Donating Member (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. There were hundreds of embeds....
Edited on Fri Jun-18-04 08:11 PM by graham67
I saw several articles on the process to be embedded. They had to go to a "bootcamp" and I think some of them had to agree to withhold sensitive information if that information would put troops in harms way. Info on embedding here:


In those ground rules, reporters must agree to honor news embargoes that may be imposed to protect operational security. An embargo means that no reports can be filed about a specific military operation before it occurs, or while it is under way. The embargoes will remain in effect until US military officials determine that the threat of compromising operational security has passed.

Only approximate figures will be allowed to be reported about the strength of US troops and their allies, as well as casualties. Information that cannot be reported - on grounds that it would jeopardize operations and endanger the lives of troops - include specific troop deployments or numbers of aircraft, tanks, artillery, landing craft, radar units and trucks.

The names of military installations or specific geographic locations of military units in the Gulf region also cannot be reported unless specifically released by the US Department of Defense. News and images that identify or include identifiable features of troop locations also are not authorized for release.

Also, reporters are not allowed to disclose information about the effectiveness of enemy attacks, camouflage, deception, targeting, intelligence collection or security. Photographers and television cameramen also will only be allowed to record images of dead US soldiers if the images do not show their faces or name tags. In compliance with the Geneva Convention, no photographs, video footage or interviews of Iraqi prisoners of war is allowed.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/EC13Ak01.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah, I was just about to pull that last sentence from the article..
Edited on Fri Jun-18-04 08:23 PM by Paragon
In compliance with the Geneva Convention, no photographs, video footage or interviews of Iraqi prisoners of war is allowed.

Very interesting...so does that mean any information embeds might have has to be leaked, a la 60 Minutes II?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kodi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. to lie.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC