Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush lie shown in Minneapolis Star Tribune letter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 08:46 PM
Original message
Bush lie shown in Minneapolis Star Tribune letter
Edited on Fri Jun-18-04 08:52 PM by Eric J in MN
This Letter-to-the-Editor quotes a letter by Bush asking for authorization bill for the Iraq War and a recent George. W. quote to show what a liar he is.



http://www.startribune.com/stories/563/4835756.html


Changing his story

From President Bush's letter to Congress regarding the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107-243):

"Public Law 107-243 is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001."

From President Bush on Thursday:

"his administration never said that the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated between Saddam and Al-Qaida."

He's right, they never used the word "orchestrated" -- just "planned, authorized, committed" and "aided."

See, this president doesn't lie.

---------------------------

The George W. Bush letter referred to in the Letter-to-the-Editor

Text of a Letter from the President to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Tempore of the Senate

---------------------------


March 18, 2003

Dear Mr. Speaker: (Dear Mr. President

Consistent with section 3(b) of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 (Public Law 107-243), and based on information available to me, including that in the enclosed document, I determine that:

(1) reliance by the United States on further diplomatic and other peaceful means alone will neither (A) adequately protect the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq nor (B) likely lead to enforcement of all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq; and

(2) acting pursuant to the Constitution and Public Law 107-243 is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.

Sincerely,

GEORGE W. BUSH

---------------------------






Peter Vickerman, Hopkins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
disgruntled_goat Donating Member (637 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. is it just me?
or is the strib on fire lately?

they're gonna need a new editor for "kicking ass and taking names"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. they publish rightwing letters, too (nt)
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Hell yes they are! I'm tellin ya they are tellin it like it is!
:toast: to the strib!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasSissy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, it does authorize for international terrorists and terrorist organiz
It does authorize for international terrorists and terrorist organizations, generally. It includes, but is not limited to, those involved with 9/11.

I don't think this is a smoking gun. But it's close.

Thanks for the article. I heard it read on AirAmerica today by a call-in, but I couldn't find the letter on the Internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-04 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Why did Bush include the last part in the letter
Why did Bush include the last part in the letter:

"including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001."

if he didn't want to imply that Iraq was involved in 9/11?

If Bush were honest, he would have left out the last part.

Bush is a liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC