I heard on TV that Clinton wants to sabotage Kerry. True?

I heard on TV a theory that Clinton's releasing his book at this time, shortly before the Dem. Convention, is more evidence that Clinton would like * to win the election, so that Hillary would be able to run in 2008.

At first I thought this was ridiculous, then I got to thinking about it, and it did seem at least somewhat plausible. If Kerry wins, Hillary will not be able to run in 2008. And Clinton is acting sort of as her political advisor, so......????

True? Or not true?

about Hillary's career then they do this country. I think they care more about the country and will sacrifice Hillary's career to save us from 4 more years of Bush. They see the danger in a second term of this corrupt administration.

It is RW shilling. They have tried to put an evil face on the Clintons for the past 10 years, what makes you think they are going to stop now?

The truth? LOL! They wouldn't know it if it bit them in the ass!

and now I need stitches.

So it isn't a big deal if they need ass stitches every now and then, their insurance will cover it!

Poor people can't afford to get bit in the ass with the truth!

They can easily vote themselves by voting for the Party championing the Poor.

Look at the Democratic track record.

Vote Dem.

:eyes:

Where did you hear this, Faux? This has been a talking point of the lunatic fringe on the right for some time.

"journalists" are not such.

when there was a substitute for Tweety. One of the guests, and not a right winger. I repeat that I think it MAY have been Hardball.

I watch mainly CNN and MSNBC. I watch Faux sometimes, to keep abreast of what they are saying, but I would never make the mistake of believing something like that coming from them.

I watch mainly Aaron Brown on CNN and Tweety on MSNBC.

It was a discussion about the Clinton book, obviously, and the question was the usual something like, "Do you think that Clinton's book being released at this time will have any effect on the Kerry campaign?" And the responder said something like, "It's hard to know. But being released so closely to the Democratic Convention, and if the book becomes a bit hit, it would be talked about and get coverage on through the fall, it might steal some of Kerry's thunder. And that may be fine with Clinton since, as you know, he has been acting as Hillary's political advisor, and it is possible that he wouldn't mind seeing Bush win this November so that Hillary could run for President in 2008." Something like that. I just can't recall who the guest was. It wasn't an obvious far right winger, like some nobody that Hannity would have on. But it's possible it was someone on the right, just not far right (like Pat Buchanan), but it's also possible it was a leftie or just a factual type journalist. I think the guest also said that it's possible it would help Kerry. He was just supposing several results of the Clinton book.

Clinton is campaigning for Kerry. . .they want him to win! Hillary can still run in 2012

"Clinton wants Kerry to lose" theory on Hardball. Sorry about the language, I just can't stand that guy. He is also a torture apologist and seems to think it is justified to get info.

He is scum.

No, I didn't know that Tweety supported that theory personally. Didn't know he didn't like Clinton or Kerry, whichever. He's not a * supporter, though.

Maybe he's ticked 'cause Clinton won't do his show.

Everytime I watch him he seems to be making excuses for all of the policies and corruption regarding this administration.

He seems very sympathetic to this administration. He is more predictable then he is shocking when he talks about these crooks. That is just MHO.

He was nice about Dean because Dean has that effect on people and because his son was/is a Deaniac. But he is a knee pad * supporter. It's what pays his bills.

This is just another rightwing, confabulated talking point. Consider the source. It's horse hockey!

If Clinton speaks ANYWHERE near as powerfully about Kerry as he did at the Dem unity dinner, he will catapult him into the White House

They've been pushing this theory since the primary battle began.

it is media and repug divide and conquer within our party. it will be good having clinton out there getting press. they arent going to give to kerry anyway. wont hurt at all nation getting some clinton talk adn media cant divide us. screw them and their pettiness

dont let them get away with it

but i did hear that Clinton was fighting his publisher about not wanting it put out now - because he did not want to interfere with the campaign. His publisher insisted, and so Clinton plans to use the free press and publicity stops to tout Kerry!

It'll all be good for us. Brush away the Reagan-love-fest-plaque!

Consider how the pukes foam at the mouth anytime Clinton gets publicity.

That's venom that's not being directed at Kerry.

Kerry courting McCain Bushwah.

These talking heads have to fill airtime... lots of "theories" have been floated, almost none of which bear the slightest resemblance to Truth.

Critical thought demands that the source be considered... who is floating the theory, on what basis, and what does she or he have to gain?

And on what planet does Big Dog's book HURT Kerry's chances, anyway?

Sheeeeesh! :eyes:

I guess you're not familiar with right wing talking points. They've been pushing this little piece'o'crap ever since the Dem primaries. Actually even BEFORE -- then it was: "Clinton will sabotage the Dem nominee so that Hilary can run in 2008".

The right wing is OBSESSED with Hilary running for prez -- you won't see actual Democrats talking about it.

sw

there may not be another "election" for Hillary to win. It isn't like Bush respects the constitution or anything.

It's reminding everyone how peaceful and prosperous the country was during those eight years -- and how awful it's been since.

The hubbub about the book will be mostly over by the convention -- it won't distract from Kerry at all.

What's WITH the media, anyway????? How can they stand being such whores?????

STEP AWAY FROM THE FOX...

The Clintons are very smart. They know that a kerry victory will keep open the opportunity for Senator Clinton to run in the future. Please understand what many people -- including the Clintons -- realize: if bush remains in office, our country will experience a level of divisiveness and violence that comes with the death of democracy. I do not think that many people are fully aware of the tragic consequences of NOT kicking bush out of office this November. My friend, you will not recognize the streets of the towns and cities of America by 2008 if that administration remains in Washington, DC.

the President of the senate will be Hillary. That is the most important job in the Country. Even better than being president. Nothing goes forward without the president of the senate putting it out there.

Both Bill and Hillary have spoken out in public in favor of John Kerry and they have done so forcefully...

Just a bunch of crap. I received a letter today from Hillary asking me to contribute (again) to the Kerry Campaign and it contained the strongest denouncement of Bush and his actions and policies, as well as, of course, a strong endorsement of Kerry. The return envelope is addressed to John Kerry for President, Inc.

A better speculation would be: The Clinton's want Kerry to win so that Hillary can become the VP in his second term.

They'll tell you that Hillary NEEDS to run soon, that in 2012 she'll be what, 64? 65?

We'll just say "Raygun was 69. Drop it. NOW." And the assholes won't have a leg to stand on.

Plus, it does no good to plan for a tomorrow that may never come... if we lose in 2004, six billion people lose. I'm betting every thing I have on it.

can only help Kerry. The Book will remind us all about the True Good Old Days and how the Repuks just hate people. Also Clinton doesn't like Bush. Does anyone know if he or Hillary are going to talk at the Convention???

but this seems extreme, even to me.

i'd imagine that either way. she'll run in 08. good for her.

67% of Americans support Clinton. No problem.

Welcome to DU!! :toast:

That's a conspiracy theory that the Repub. pundits have been spreading for some time. They like to bring it up repeatedly on talk radio. Clinton was trying to sabotage Dean, Clinton was trying to sabotage Gephardt, Clinton is trying to sabotage Kerry, all so Hillary can have a clean spot to run in 2008. It's just a conspiracy theory. They really do hate Bill Clinton that much and Hillary even more.

is where she thinks she can do the most good. She said this when asked if she would take the VP slot with Kerry. She evidently has declined Kerry. So if she wanted to be President someday, it would make sense that she would've taken the VP slot with Kerry, which would have put her in place for the Presidency.

vote kerry in '04!!! it's the ONLY WAY to keep them out...:evilgrin:

Like most of what is said on CNN and MSRNC.
Turn those stations off. Listen to CBS nightly news, they try to be balanced and you will get actual news. Watch C-span when they carry live coverage of events. Skip Washington Journal when the people call in... it's nothing more than the call in version of whatever that horrible show Carville and Begala are on is called. First the conservative spouts shit the liberal spouts shit back and forth yada yada yada.
Put Air America on your computer, read the LBN forum and leave TV for entertainment.

Maybe Democrats forget there is an election so they neglect to vote?

Or they get so impressed with Clinton that their disappointment with Kerry leads them to vote for -- someone else? Like Bush for instance.

That Clinton, with his magnificent charisma "sucks up all the oxygen," and the poor asphyxiated democrats die of suffocation before they can crawl to the voting booth?

Is there a plausible scenario where Clinton's book peddling hurts the Kerry election campaign?

Only in the minds of Republicans, who can't imagine someone who can hold more than one idea in his head.

In short, nonsense.

--IMM

...will tell you it's crap--same test useful in dispelling most Reichpublican crap.

If the incessant torrent of insider-expose books about the Bush admin have failed to torpedo W's campaign, how big a difference is one Clinton bio more or less going to make?

Like everybody's saying, it's just Scaifean fakenews masquerading as something for pundits to tak about.