Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Show Me State bans sexy billboards

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 12:45 PM
Original message
Show Me State bans sexy billboards
KANSAS CITY, Missouri (AP) -- Show Me State is cracking down on bawdy billboards.

Gov. Bob Holden on Thursday signed a bill banning sexually suggestive billboards that promote strip clubs and other adult businesses. The ban applies within one mile of Missouri highways.

Some billboards in Missouri portray scantily clad women and read "Live Nude" or "Red Hot Nude."

"We have the right to drive the highways of this state without children being assaulted by these images," Holden said.

more - http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/Central/06/17/sexy.billboards.ap/

So it is OK to use sex to sell everything but SEX!

It's too bad because in small markets, billboards may be the only advertising venue. Only 1 out of 5 radio stations in town will take my business, the TV station won't accept my advertising, as well as the free county-wide advertising paper. At least the local newspaper will take my ads. A billboard would be nice, but they are super expensive, and require a long contract.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Las Vegas also banned sexy billboards
Or at least sexually-oreinted billboards used to advertise casinos (nudie bars can still advertise "live nude girls" though).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lestat Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Another thing the RW fundies are silencing.
Edited on Sat Jun-19-04 12:52 PM by Lestat
What are they gonna ban next? Bikinis at the beach? They're too revealing, aren't they? How about low-cut jeans or shirts? They gonna ban them too?

These RW fundies need to be stopped and stopped now. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It is a slippery slope
The same logic can applied to many different things - like you said, bikinis, low-cut jeans...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. they already are trying to ban low cut jeans
in louisiana. Burkas for everyone, Yeah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lestat Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Jesus Christ.
Edited on Sat Jun-19-04 12:54 PM by Lestat
Like I said, these nutjobs need to be stopped NOW! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jabbery Donating Member (238 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. They plan to ban sex itself next
It's a disgusting immoral liberal concept.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lestat Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yeah...they're gonna get rid of the orgasm..
just like Big Brother tried to do in the book 1984. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mongo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. With test tube babies, that may not be far from the truth.
I can see it now - GOD wants you to have a child the natural way - in a test tube. 100% sin free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. One Word: Silhouettes
They will be replaced with buxom feminine silhouettes. They won't be "scantily clad"... because the viewer gets to use their OWN IMAGINATION as to whether the silhouetted figure has clothes or not.

-- Allen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC