Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

At what point in their reelection campaigns did Carter and GHWB fall

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 02:48 PM
Original message
At what point in their reelection campaigns did Carter and GHWB fall
clearly behind in polling, never to tie or regain the lead? Just curious as to how this compares to shrub's position.

One difference is that those one termers didn't have anywhere near the money or media propaganda machinery dedicated to propping them up in power. RW echo machine had not come close to reaching full flower like today.

Any good links to the polling data from these past elections?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leyton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Methinks Carter fell behind after the debates,
when Reagan was finally seen as a viable alternative.

Somewhere there's a great graphic of polling data for all the recent Presidents, each superimposed over one another so that you can compare their standings at comparable points in their terms. I don't have the link, but hopefully some DUer will come along with it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbane Donating Member (668 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. After the failed hostage...
After the failed hostage rescue attempt, the roof just collapsed on Carter. The debates may have been the event the tipped it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Welcome to DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemPopulist Donating Member (446 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. For Carter, after the debate; for Bush, after the Democratic convention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. What I remember..

In 1992, I was one of the first people to have a Bill Clinton sticker on their car. I remember, fairly early on in the year, people being, like "you've got to be kidding- that guy can't win".. On the other hand, I also remember being very optimistic by the time the election rolled around.

With Carter, I was too young to vote, but I do remember I never liked Reagan, even in the late 70s. Always thought he was an ass. And I couldn't stand Jerry Falwell from the moment he showed up on my TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doni_georgia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Bush and Carter both had pretty sizable leads in April and May
of their respective election years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BushHater2004 Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Carter around the debates, Bush around the 1992 Convention
Edited on Sat Jun-19-04 06:40 PM by BushHater2004
It also should be added that Reagan and Clinton were both losing at some points in 1984 and 1996.

This race will be a dead heat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Why do you feel it will necessarily be a dead heat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Cuz some folks is dumb
With Reagan, many people saw a "King." The story of humankind is this way: We want a shepherd who will tell us what to do and powder our itty bitty butts and beat up the "bullies." Reagan represented this paternal leader type. Carter represented weakness ( unable to get hostages out) and the more cerebral expression of the democratic process. This was precisely the time that education took a back seat to personality.

Bush is in the same boat as Carter. People are ashamed and sickened by him. But he still has a solid base of "Paulian's(sorry, Christians is what they call themselves)" who would cut off their left nuts ( and probably already have) to get their Divinely Chosen Dude to stay in the White House and protect them from the bad, bad gay people and pagans and Liberals....Carter never played the ELect God card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I think the veep pick will decide if you are right.
He's got some good talent to choose from, but most expect and are counting on him picking Edwards. I think Edwards would be a good choice.

If his choice is right, then it could be a landslide.

Molly Ivins said that bush is not good at fighting a defensive fight. The numerous scandal has had him fighting a defensive fight against numerous enemies. Kerry has had an easy time in that he can spend more time speaking about his agenda, and less attacking bush's record and character. So if the scandals ease up, Kerry then can unload on bush.

Remember, bush did a huge negative attack on Kerry and it had little if any effect.
Look for this race to see saw anyway. But Kerry will win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-19-04 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Carter - Iran Rescue/Poppy - GOOP Convention
Definitely that failed rescue and the resulting second guessing (really the first time I saw the media conjecture like they do now) that made Carter look weak. They also made a big deal of his "Rose Garden" strategy where he cut back on campaigning...unlike Bunnypants who is forever fundraising.

Poppy was a more complex mess. There was the Post Gulf Oil War hangover...being so high in the polls, a shitty economy that, just like now, wasn't turning around and there was no sign it was...and then Perot. By this time in '92, Perot was the "front runner" (right before the BFEE Black Helicopters spooked this wierd dude).

When Perot bailed out (right before the GOOP Convention), he got back in right after, and Poppy brought in Baker to "finesse" things, I thought Clinton was gonna be in trouble, but then came the Convention...and two things out of it. First, the vile and nasty tone of the proceedings...highlighted by Pitchfork Pat. Then by the opening of rifts inside the GOOP itself...that pissed off both sides so that neither side really worked for Poppy.

One common thread with '80, '92 & '00...the party that really wanted to win did. Clinton united Democrats like none had since LBJ, and now Kerry enjoys even greater unity than Clinton...and I expect these bonds to stay strong as we see the prize and it can be won! Bye bye Bunnypants!

Cheers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC