Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

why did people riot during the 77 blackouts but not the 65 blackouts?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
pstokely Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 09:14 AM
Original message
why did people riot during the 77 blackouts but not the 65 blackouts?
Edited on Sat Aug-16-03 09:15 AM by pstokely
would people have rioted Thursday if 9/11 had never happened?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slappypan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. There was a severe snowstorm during the '65 blackout.
I think the '77 blackout occured in summer. I think times have changed, people have instant access to information so they are not as panicky when something like this happens, and the police are much better prepared and can respond more quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. i think higher unemployement rates and interest rates and poverty in 77?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. My thoughts exactly ...
and I think with 9/11 still in their minds, it made people be more civil during times of crisis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slappypan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. also demographics
We have an older population now; in '77 the huge baby boom generation was between18 and 30, the age group responsible for most crime. I believe the rate of violent crime in the U.S. peaked in the late 70's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. I read something somewhere saying that JFK's class origins didn't
matter to voters so much in the early 60s because, coming off the huge economic gains and growth of the 50s, everybody felt rich. This also explained the appeal of James Bond, who was a playboy living the lifestyle of the ultra-wealthy. Everybody identified with that, some the Bond books and movies got big.

So, I'd say, people didn't riot in '65 because they felt like they were pretty content with their economic situation. By '77, it was a different story. Society wasn't working and people saw the blackout as an opportunity to get what they thought they were being denied by a fucked up social reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. There were riots in the 60s
including the deadly Watts riots, and lesser known Chicago riots, of 1965. Detroit and Newark both saw riots in 1967. But these riots were mostly race-related.

At any rate, the blackout of July 13, 1977 lasted 25 hours, while the November 9, 1965 blackout lasted less than 12 hours. Perhaps the length and/or season was a causative factor:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnyawl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. ANGER!

Pure and simple, the answer is anger. '65? That was just before the country exploded in a cycle of protest, riots, and assasinations. Both the Civil Rights movement, and the anti-war movement, were relatively non-violent (at least on the part of the demonstrators) until '67. Both became increasingly violent after '67. The assasination of ML King, and Bobby Kennedy; the "police riot" in Chicago at the Democratic convention in '68; the shootings at Kent State; these are all the "highlights" of what was an angry, society increasingly at odds with itself, and willing to turn to mob violence when provoked. The resignation of Nixon in '74, and the election of Carter in '76 did a lot to soothe that, but there was still a great residue of anger at society, especially amongst those people who were not yet seeing any tangible benefits from the struggle for equality. Given an excuse (the suspension of civil order due to a blackout) the reaction in '77 was to loot, smash and destroy. A quite different reaction from the blackouts of '65 and '03.

Well, that's what I think, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jagguy Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-16-03 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Civility was still in effect
not for much longer though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC