|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
UdoKier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 03:19 PM Original message |
Check out Lou Dobbs' INSANE gay marriage poll!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trotsky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 03:20 PM Response to Original message |
1. The freaking point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ibegurpard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 03:22 PM Original message |
I think you're right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 03:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
7. But it doesn't address whether one favors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GCP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 03:24 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. What trotsky said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Selwynn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 03:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. I am one of them.... unless... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 03:33 PM Response to Reply #1 |
16. I agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 04:24 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. Well said, 4_year_nightmare! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newyawker99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 06:30 PM Response to Reply #16 |
31. Hi 4_year_nightmare!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 03:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
19. I agree. I think many people are upset about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasSissy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 04:35 PM Response to Reply #1 |
29. I agree. You can be against same sex marriage but not think it's appropri |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maveric (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
2. 9% Yes, 91% No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apnu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 03:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. still going strong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kayell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
3. They have finally figured out how to get results they want no matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKNancy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 03:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
14. This is a favorable result for our side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
markses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 04:32 PM Response to Reply #14 |
26. It is an extremely favorable result for our side |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
4. Wasn't that his poll yesterday? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 03:26 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Maybe it does. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Terran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 04:14 PM Response to Reply #10 |
22. No, there's no need for such an amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shakespeare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
5. I don't see anything vague about that at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UdoKier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 03:27 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. If it's a states' rights issue... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shakespeare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 03:32 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. Nope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
markses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 04:33 PM Response to Reply #11 |
27. It is not soimething that should be enshrined in the Constitution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchtv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
6. hardly vague |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 03:28 PM Response to Original message |
12. That's correct, it doen not address whether you favor it or not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shakespeare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 03:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. GREAT post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 04:22 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. but poorly typed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
17. First there must NOT be a Constitutional Amendment to STOP gay marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
20. This is BETTER |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
markses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 04:34 PM Response to Reply #20 |
28. Ding Ding Ding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hatrack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
21. Still 91% NO at 5:08 EDT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
markses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
25. It is the CORRECT question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bandit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jul-14-04 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
30. Different poll there now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC