I would seriously consider moving after that one. (heck im seriously considering moving after nov 2 if bush ends up as president again...already spoken to the canadian embassy, gotten a bunch of literature, etc).
So I demand that we ban divorce and interracial marriage via constitutional amendment as well. After all, there are religious bases for doing so...therefore, it's our duty.
This may be sarcasm but I think you have damn good idea here. I would love to see them flutter and sputter if someone started a movement on banning divorce. lol
But THIS cannot be the election year issue. We have too many far more important things to deal with, and this is not a popular issue for us. Just drop it for now, and we'll deal with it when the adults are back in charge.
I'll be able to stand in opposition with you in November after Georgia's "We hate gays too" squad votes. At least, we'll have our convictions. As a hetero, I just don't understand why people can't live and let live.
9. Actually they passed the "If gays can marry, my wife will leave me for
another woman" amendment...unfortunately, California defined marriage as between a man and a woman 8 years ago....it isn't as though blue states are more evolved on this point.
16. We don't need the FMA because STATES ARE BIGOTED ENOUGH!
That was the argument I understood from the Senate discussion on FMA. Senator Feinstein was one that propounded this argument... and I guess she is correct.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(570 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
