Where are Bush & Rice quotes on lack of Iraq threat, pre-9/11?

I remember a number of quotes saying that Iraq did NOT pose an imminent threat to the US and lacked the means of delivering WMDs against US targets.

Please, if anyone knows where these are posted, let me know! Thanks...

Is the Bush Administration gave $43 million to the Taliban regime for their anti-drug practices in Afghanistan on MAY 2001.

Why aren't we talking about that?

Is this how Bush handles terrorists?

http://www.robertscheer.com/1_natcolumn/01_columns/052201.htm

What Colin Powell said about WMD AFTER Bush became president, but before becoming 'war president' (and long before becoming the 'peace president').

http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2001/933.htm


That purpose is every bit as important now as it was ten years ago when we began it. And frankly they have worked. He has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbors.


The $43 million dollar item is a loser - Powell presented it as a grant from 2 US aid agencies, specifically NOT for dispensation by the Taliban, as relief from the terrible drought that the Afghanis were suffering from. He DID cautiously praise the Taliban's anti-drug efforts in making the presentation, but specifically criticized their human rights record.

Scheer tried to wiggle out of that one some time ago.

Thank you very much.

QUESTION: The Egyptian press editorial commentary that we have seen here has been bitterly aggressive in denouncing the U.S. role and not welcoming you. I am wondering whether you believe you accomplished anything during your meetings to assuage concerns about the air strikes against Iraq and the continuing sanctions?

SECRETARY POWELL: I received a very warm welcome from the leaders and I know there is some unhappiness as expressed in the Egyptian press. I understand that, but at the same time, with respect to the no-fly zones and the air strikes that we from time to time must conduct to defend our pilots, I just want to remind everybody that the purpose of those no-fly zones and the purpose of those occasional strikes to protect our pilots, is not to pursue an aggressive stance toward Iraq, but to defend the people that the no-fly zones are put in to defend. The people in the southern part of Iraq and the people in the northern part of Iraq, and these zones have a purpose, and their purpose is to protect people--protect Arabs--not to affect anything else in the region. And we have to defend ourselves.

We will always try to consult with our friends in the region so that they are not surprised and do everything we can to explain the purpose of our responses. We had a good discussion, the Foreign Minister and I and the President and I, had a good discussion about the nature of the sanctions--the fact that the sanctions exist-- not for the purpose of hurting the Iraqi people, but for the purpose of keeping in check Saddam Hussein's ambitions toward developing weapons of mass destruction.

We should constantly be reviewing our policies, constantly be looking at those sanctions to make sure that they are directed toward that purpose. That purpose is every bit as important now as it was ten years ago when we began it. And frankly they have worked. He has not developed any significant capability with respect to weapons of mass destruction. He is unable to project conventional power against his neighbors. So in effect, our policies have strengthened the security of the neighbors of Iraq, and these are policies that we are going to keep in place, but we are always willing to review them to make sure that they are being carried out in a way that does not affect the Iraqi people but does affect the Iraqi regime's ambitions and the ability to acquire weapons of mass destruction, and we had a good conversation on this issue.

entire speech at

http://bartcopnation.com/dc/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=8&topic_id=413