Who do you believe BushCo hates more? Al-Qaeda or Democrats?

Well, let's see here. Al-Qaeda attacks - BushCo's approval ratings skyrocket. Dissenting/unpatriotic Democrats attack - BushCo's approval ratings take a slow, steady nosedive.

Who does BushCo see as a greater threat? The ruling Busheviks evidently believe Al-Qaeda can be fought sporadically - part-time (time off can be taken to start up an unrelated war with a nation that poses no threat) - using primarily outside forces such as the Afghan Northern Alliance and the Pakistani army along with Pakistani intelligence.

Democrats, meanwhile, must be fought 24/7 - year round - utilizing the heaviest hitters in the Bush Cabal - even pulling out the supreme, indispensable one himself (Dick Cheney) from any one of a multitude of his undisclosed locations - to wage a never-ending war against dissent - namely the evil insurgent Democrats and the woefully outdated and irrelevant document they keep waving in his face - the U.S. Constitution. The BushCo authored and sponsored Patriot Act promises to curtail the rights of dissenting U.S. citizens (a.k.a. Democrats) - far more than it does any Al-Qaeda operatives - only an infinitesimally small percentage of whom actually live in the United States.

BushCo led smear campaigns regarding the public records and private lives of high profile Democrats who have the audacity to challenge BushCo's supreme authority (some of whom even dare choose to run against them and their ruling party in "free" elections) dominate the American mainstream news media.

Who have you honestly witnessed more BushCo/Repuke attacks against - John Kerry or Osama Bin Laden? Is it even close? The fact is, Theresa Heinz has received far more BushCo led smearing than any Al Qaeda member has. Before Kerry became the Dem front runner it was Howard Dean who bore the brunt of the attack - at a time when Bush was essentially saying he didn't know/and no longer cared where Bin Laden was.

So BushCo positively despises Al-Qaeda because this group sponsored an attack upon a pair of buildings in New York City - the liberal hub of the world - in Manhattan - the most liberal part of the city - an area who voted almost 70% against Bushler in the previous election?
In addition to being predominantly liberal, many of the people in these attacked buildings were actually foreigners or foreign born. I'll bet that great humanitarian Tom Delay, for example, was really tore up about it. Likewise, I saw how President Bush really leapt into action upon receiving the bad news in that Florida classroom. I remember, too, on that fateful day, how the tears flowed freely from the compassionate PNAC faces of Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz. Richard Perle, as I recall, couldn't stop blubbering. And for that beacon of justice, poor, devastated little Johnny Ashcroft - he had to get to work making plenty of photo copies of the neo-fascist Patriot Act - which had ALREADY BEEN WRITTEN.

Anyway, my fellow dissenting Democrats, next time you hear any of the Bushista operative refer to an "enemy" - make no mistake about it - the PRIMARY enemy, the enemy they're always ultimately referring to -is YOU!

Scrunch your head into your shoulders, screw up your face as ugly as you can and hiss wetly....LIBERALSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!! AND THEIR FREEDOM LOVING VALUESSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!

Wearing turbans.

of democrats ........

..BECAUSE democrats protect them, apologize for them, want to hand the US over to them, give $$ to them (THK), etc


(listening to 1 minute bits of RW talk radio to and from work is driving me crazy........thank God and Skinner et al for DU, and thanks to all who post here)

:dem:

al-qaeda and bin laden are the best things to happen to the repugs. They want the repugs in power to swell their own ranks.

Are NOT Al-Qaeda leaders?? I could've sworn they were.