Here I come to the rescue:
She obviously is not citing her sources regarding aeronautical knowledge.
She is thinking of the F-104 StarFighter, also dubbed as the "widow maker" for its dubious security record. Problem is that Bush never flew the 104, he did F-102 Delta Dagger... a old plane being phased out. It was designed to intercept rusky boogies and blow them out of the sky with a thermonuclear warhead mounted in a "dumb" missile named the genie. To the extent of the mission, the pilot was responsible to just fly the plane off the ground. The risks associated with the deployment of nuclear warheads in the middle of the atmosphere meant that using normal techniques the engagement would be almost suicidal, so the plane was designed with an integrated weapons system that could return the plane back to the ground safely if anything happened to the pilot. This is, this was the first plane that could land on its own (well that was the theory anyways). So not to detract anything from the pilots who manned these planes, but there were nothing more than the lifters as far as the weapons system was concerned. Yeah, super risky assignment indeed.
Still the question remains that W marked explicity in his record that he did not wish to be deployed overseas, whereas Kerry did in fact volunteer. If W is so brave, I am sure he had no problem with being sent overseas. Afterall what good does to ones country to just sit back home and fly "dangerous" planes... wouldn't have his heroism be put to a better use in Vietnam, me thinks? And what happened to a full year of his commitment, for such a brave soul he is having a mighty hard time providing any sort of proof that he indeed finished his service at all. And why was he grounded for most of his commitment?
In the end the question should be on their roof like a hot basketball from hell: If Kerry's 3 purple hearts and silver cross are not deserved? What does it say about the corruption in the US military, especially Kerry's officers which were responsible for his commendations? Does it mean that a purple heart nowadays means nothing, thus effectively they are calling the US armed forces a bunch of liars. Is a person who was grounded and who can not attest for a year of his commitment in a champagne national ward unit, and another whih asked for 5 deferrements and who got his then girlfriend pregnant in order to not go to vietnam due to other "priorities", are these folks now more patriotic and deserving of respect that another person which voluteered for war duty?
So I guess this person does not support the troops, afterall they are all cheats and liars. Anyone can get a purple heart and a silver star these days, can't they?
In case she/he has read the book, this is a good starting point to understand who is who in this affaire:
http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Swift_Boat_Veterans_for_Truth