Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mexico Challenges U.S. on Protection of UN Workers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 10:37 AM
Original message
Mexico Challenges U.S. on Protection of UN Workers

http://reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=politicsNews&storyID=3334723

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - Challenging the United States, Mexico scheduled a Security Council vote for Tuesday on the protection of U.N. workers, opposed by Washington because of a reference to the International Criminal Court.

-snip-

The Mexican draft, co-sponsored by France, Germany, Russia, Bulgaria and Syria, was first circulated in April and then revived last week after the disastrous bombing of U.N. headquarters in Baghdad on Aug. 19.

The action has put the United States in a difficult position. Vetoing or even abstaining on the resolution so soon after 23 people were killed in the bombing would be difficult to explain, diplomats said.

-snip-
-------------------------------

this has now passed - thank you Mexico for not bowing down to the bloody hands bushgang.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cherryperry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, excuuuuuse me, but
I challenge Mexico on how they treat US workers since NAFTA!

:bounce: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Mexico caved to US DEmand of no Int'l Crim Ct reference - so the
resolution says that harming UN workers is a crime under international law - but it no longer says what the country of citizenship for the dead UN worker can do about it.

They said that they did not want to embarrass the US into a veto, so they compromized.

The International Court will have to wait for a post Bush US Administration - we have Gitmo and don't need no UN International Law cover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That is too bad, it should have stayed in there
"The Bush administration opposes the new court, set up to try perpetrators of the world's most heinous crimes, as an infringement of U.S. sovereignty and a potential venue for frivolous lawsuits against U.S. officials abroad."

FRIVOLOUS?????? No wonder they hate this court!!!! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. There is an irony here...
say Bush, after he is turfed from the White House, is judged to be a war criminal by the ICC, he cannot go to any country that is a signatory to the ICC, mind you, he doesn't go anywhere anyway, but, still, he would be known as an at-large criminal and I would LOVE to see that happen!

(I know, I know, wishful thinking but it does give me pleasure at the thought! lol)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian Sweat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. I thought Fox was Bush's man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Haha, the Fireworks Were Long Ago Snuffed
It sounds like El Presidente wouldn't even provide EXILE for Shrub when he's going to need it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC