Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BBV: Update #2 on Press Conference

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
RedEagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 10:09 PM
Original message
BBV: Update #2 on Press Conference
I had posted one earlier about both venues being filled and it seemed to disappear.

In a brief call with a very tired Bev:

It seemed to go well. Both venues were packed and that includes major media.

The point of the Baxter demo was, I think, (and not what Diebold is trying to make of it) that the ability to change an election is that simple. No computer expertise required. Anyone could walk anyone else through it.

They had a reporter come up and try it and I guess that was pretty revealing. Nothing like a hands on.

Sounds like Hugh Thompson was outstanding.

Lowell Finley made a presentation at the end that gave legal precedence for doing what needs to be done- hand counted paper ballots for the federal positions in November.

My SO saw this covered on MSNBC. We tried to monitor the three networks tonight, but if they had it on, we missed it. Likely that they need to put a package together on this one and that takes a bit more time. So keep your fingers crossed.

I'm sure you'll get more detail after Bev and Andy get back and get some rest.

The vendors are still on their rant about procedure preventing access. Bev got a first-hand, all night look at that procedure recently and it ain't what it's being marketed to be.

Besides, there is simply no excuse for designing that many vulnerabilties into a voting system.

What was that line by Scotty in one of the Trek movies? The more complicated the system, the easier it is to gum up the works?

The central tabulator was the first problem. Touch screens just added another venue of vulnerability.

And I'd like to add this little bit of information I was told that will probably take a records request to pry the actual study out of the county: one of the Washington counties with DRE's did a survey of people who qualify to need a disabled voting system. Only 2 of them cared to go to the polls to use a machine. The rest just wanted their ballots mailed to them. I wonder what would happen if a real survey were conducted, how many really just want easier access- i.e., not going to the polls, but voting by mail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. YAHOOO
Edited on Wed Sep-22-04 10:11 PM by DanSpillane
I am with you in heart!

But I am busy busting other things which are needed.
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. One of the better stories on this....
http://wired.com/news/evote/0,2645,65031,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_1


Kim Zetter, who goes into more detail about the vulnerabilities.

Jefferson is right. There is no excuse for a system with this many holes in it.

You ever notice how, the ultimate security is supposed to be election personel, but if things go right, it's the system that get the praise, if they go wrong, it's the uneducated election people? Geeeze, you'd think the election officials would get tired of this double-standard song and dance.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Back up
Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Amazing, isn't it RedEagle? Our election is about to be stolen, and
nobody at DU is kicking the BBV threads? I only have a couple of minutes a day to be on DU these days, due to a new job. But every day I do a "search" for the BBV threads.

I can just hear all the whining on Nov. 3rd: "THEY STOLE THE ELECTION!!" Yet, hardly anyone can lift a finger to even kick a thread!

Too many people don't realize that THIS IS THE ONLY ISSUE THAT COUNTS in today's America....with a RE-regulated media coming in a close second.

I'll kick it!!

:kick::kick::kick::kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. kick ...give it all you got for pen & paper (read the Palast interview)
Florida is targeted again


http://www.liberaloasis.com/palast3.htm


don't tell me Jeb isn't helping
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kanary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. I agree with you completely on the inaction and inattention
But, I extend it to ALL the important issues at DU.

Look at any suggestion that people should call and write their congresscritters about an issue..... usually sinks unless one person takes it upon themselves to keep pushing it. It's much more fun to write posts laughing at Laura than it is to do the hard work of goosing our system.

I've posted many threads about poverty issues, and requesting people call and write about the HUD cuts....... sinks like a stone. Actually, I don't recall you responding to those. Yet, right afterwards, there is some flap about Whoopee Goldberg, and a huge long thread organizes email for Whoopee...... as if she is threatened with being tossed out in the street.

I could go on and on with examples of inaction. The RW has us beat all to hell on this score. Yet, it's just much easier to blame the press, or post some breathless article about another stooooooooopid thing said by a RW pundit on TV.

:crazy:

Kanary

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. That article is excellent and sobering......
Lou Dobbs did a very short (like 3 minutes!) segment last night with the Maryland fixer of elections and a Truevote Maryland woman. It wasn't very informative. I was so hoping it was going to be Bev's demo that was to be on... :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kanary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I was *very* disappointed in the coverage on Lou Dobbs, and am writing him
about it. THere was just not enough time devoted to it, and as important as this is, it needs the time and attention.

Also, there needs to be a better choice of spokesperson. I'm deeply grateful to the woman who spoke on behalf of the voting action group, but she is not experienced enough to take on the RW spin machine. She got walked on. She has worked hard on this issue, and deserves support, but someone who is able to hold the line with the RW needs to be in front of the cameras.

Kanary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. The Wired article is excellent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. kick for the late AM crowd on the east coast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. Simply Stated
What we have here is a failure to have an open system.

Oh, it's open to a point. That point is that anybody could access the system and change the totals.

But what is closed and kept secret is the software that is a secret, open only to those who wrote the code. The designed code must become public domain.

What Bev has done is to expose the flaws in the design. The design flaws are numerous and critical.

E-voting, let's face it, is the future. But there are far too many kinks to be worked out, and the kinks inherent in these new machines can be used to steal an election.

Don't think for one second that the pukes haven't figured out how to use these machines to steal the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. the point is "what are we at DU going to do?"..... what can we ALL support
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. LOL
"Don't think for one second that the pukes haven't figured out how to use these machines to steal the vote".

The repukes designed these fraud machines to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Don't be so quick to assume Dems are guilt-free
Dems bought the machines in GA and continue to defend them to the teeth. The nitwit in MD who refuses to listen to reason (and whom the Repugs want to replace -- wonder why??) is a Dem. Dems elected people around the country have been very slow to "get it" or act on it, sometimes working actively against it (like Steny Hoyer).

No, dont be so quick to excuse them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
11. I'll believe it when I see it
Only when I personally see each corporate media network doing extended pieces on this subject will I believe it. Going back into the beginning of the Democratic presidential primary I have written to 60 Minutes a few times in particular Mike Wallace asking him to look into this subject. I thought for sure by this past June everyone would have been made aware of what a fraud these machines were. With only a lil over a month left before this election don't expect anything to remedied before then. Maybe the story will finally get out there but I can't see any way that printers or some other form of voting accountability can be in place by then.

O Well!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. maybe CBS has grown a "new pair"....Dan, are you listening?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DubyaSux Donating Member (366 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. The reason...
...nobody is paying attention, is because you are trying to force a solution to a problem that doesn't exist.

No logical person could ever conclude that several evoting companies would conspire to steal votes without anybody knowing. To do that, you would have to conclude that the democrats working for those companies - roughly 50% - would be too stupid or inept to figure that out and put a stop to it. Also, you would have to assume that repugs are that smart. That prospect should insult most.

Then, we would have to assume that monkeys could walk into election offices with a laptop and start throwing elections.

While anything is possible, so is alien invaders taking over the planet and making elections obsolete.

This is all conspiracy theory matter gone amuck. There is a reason Bev Harris is mainly on her own. She has no idea what reality is. She's twisted credible areas of concern into a green salad of salvation by scaring you. No different than shrub's campaign tactics.

Disagree with me all you want - but Democrats are not stupid. They would not allow a systematic level of fraud to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. what PROFOUND stupidity
"They would not allow a systematic level of fraud to happen."

where you born in 2001? it would explain a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. doesn't exist?
I guess you failed to watch Bev show over and over again how she entered the E voting system, as if it were your home pc and changed vote tallies with a few click of the keys. All said and done, it took 3 minutes ( if that ).

I suggest you come up to speed and in a hurry. Or maybe it's a situation where you don't want to! BTW, Welcome to DU hope you enjoy that stay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Then I guess the companies will open source the code- NOW
Gee, I mean, let's just assume corporate America should be the ones counting our votes, no auditing necessary or rather, they'll just audit themselves.

Enron voting.

Note that the above is a non-partisan problem. Money talks on both sides of the isle.

Speaking of not letting fraud happen, what happens when the Dems speak up, is the right wing spin machine going to support them or spin the problem just as you do? Play both sides of the game and declare themselves right? (Uh, no pun intended)

What scares you so much about citizens taking control of their votes?

What scares you so much about robust auditing and checks and balances?

What scares you so much about people caring about representative democracy?

Please state your background and references so that we know with what authority you speak.

What bennies do you lose if the scam that is The Election Center and their close ties to election officials on behalf of the vendors goes away?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. Then, we would have to assume that monkeys could walk into election
offices with a laptop and start throwing elections.

NO. Not monkeys, but PAID REPUBLICAN HACKS. They will have election officials well trained in how to change the vote totals. They are PERCHED, READY and WAITING. We know what happened in FL.in 2000. THEY STOLE THE FUCKING ELECTION!! K? We know what they are capable of. We know they are ALL crooks. We know they purge voters from voter rolls..ILLEGALLY (out of court payments proved they were GUILTY) and we know they harassed voters, sent them to the wrong venues, sent out fliers reminding people to vote, but LOW AND BEHOLD, they put the WRONG date on the fliers...the day AFTER the election (why not the day before?) Now, go back to your boss at Diebold and try to figure out a few more ways to screw the voters. OK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
18. Kick
I'll kick this thread because I see ths topic is just so popular. To hell with it's importance. ( stated sarcastically ):kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC