Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What kind words did Edwards say to Cheney?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
romantico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 04:17 PM
Original message
What kind words did Edwards say to Cheney?
Heard Edwards said some kind words where Cheney thanked him. What did he say?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. He said "Senator" and "the" and "thank you" at different times. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheezus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. nice things about his family and gay daughter
lemme find the transcript. it was awesome -- cheney betrayed the chritian right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbassman03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. It was when Edwards said that Cheney loved his family...
When they were talking about Cheney's daughter. A small moment of compassion (?) from Cheney when he thanked him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
romantico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. WOW! Maybe thats what won it for him
People saw that even thought these two disagree, Edwards praises Cheney. People weren't expecting that. SHowed some liberal compassion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheezus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. here's the transcript:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=2456814

IFILL: The next question goes to you, Mr. Vice President.

I want to read something you said four years ago at this very setting: "Freedom means freedom for everybody." You said it again recently when you were asked about legalizing same-sex unions. And you used your family's experience as a context for your remarks.

Can you describe then your administration's support for a constitutional ban on same-sex unions?

CHENEY: Gwen, you're right, four years ago in this debate, the subject came up. And I said then and I believe today that freedom does mean freedom for everybody. People ought to be free to choose any arrangement they want. It's really no one else's business.

That's a separate question from the issue of whether or not government should sanction or approve or give some sort of authorization, if you will, to these relationships.

Traditionally, that's been an issue for the states. States have regulated marriage, if you will. That would be my preference.

In effect, what's happened is that in recent months, especially in Massachusetts, but also in California, but in Massachusetts we had the Massachusetts Supreme Court direct the state of -- the legislature of Massachusetts to modify their constitution to allow gay marriage.

And the fact is that the president felt that it was important to make it clear that that's the wrong way to go, as far as he's concerned.

Now, he sets the policy for this administration, and I support the president.

IFILL: Senator Edwards, 90 seconds.

EDWARDS: Yes. Let me say first (stuff about the previous question).

Now, as to this question, let me say first that I think the vice president and his wife love their daughter. I think they love her very much. And you can't have anything but respect for the fact that they're willing to talk about the fact that they have a gay daughter, the fact that they embrace her. It's a wonderful thing. And there are millions of parents like that who love their children, who want their children to be happy.

And I believe that marriage is between a man and a woman, and so does John Kerry.

I also believe that there should be partnership benefits for gay and lesbian couples in long-term, committed relationships.

But we should not use the Constitution to divide this country.

No state for the last 200 years has ever had to recognize another state's marriage.

This is using the Constitution as a political tool, and it's wrong.

IFILL: New question, but same subject.

As the vice president mentioned, John Kerry comes from the state of Massachusetts, which has taken as big a step as any state in the union to legalize gay marriage. Yet both you and Senator Kerry say you oppose it.

Are you trying to have it both ways?

EDWARDS: No. I think we've both said the same thing all along.

We both believe that -- and this goes onto the end of what I just talked about -- we both believe that marriage is between a man and a woman.

But we also believe that gay and lesbians and gay and lesbian couples, those who have been in long-term relationships, deserve to be treated respectfully, they deserve to have benefits.

For example, a gay couple now has a very difficult time, one, visiting the other when they're in the hospital, or, for example, if, heaven forbid, one of them were to pass away, they have trouble even arranging the funeral.

I mean, those are not the kind of things that John Kerry and I believe in. I suspect the vice president himself does not believe in that.

But we don't -- we do believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman.

And I want to go back, if I can, to the question you just asked, which is this constitutional amendment.

I want to make sure people understand that the president is proposing a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage that is completely unnecessary.

Under the law of this country for the last 200 years, no state has been required to recognize another state's marriage.

Let me just be simple about this. My state of North Carolina would not be required to recognize a marriage from Massachusetts, which you just asked about.

There is absolutely no purpose in the law and in reality for this amendment. It's nothing but a political tool. And it's being used in an effort to divide this country on an issue that we should not be dividing America on.

We ought to be talking about issues like health care and jobs and what's happening in Iraq, not using an issue to divide this country in a way that's solely for political purposes. It's wrong.

IFILL: Mr. Vice President, you have 90 seconds.

CHENEY: Well, Gwen, let me simply thank the senator for the kind words he said about my family and our daughter.
(silence)
I appreciate that very much.
(longer silence)
IFILL: That's it?

CHENEY: That's it.

IFILL: OK, then we'll move on to the next question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Am I the only one that thought...
that this exchange basically p*ssed Cheney off and he just couldn't think of anything to say?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. No, it was that he couldnt say anything.
He disagrees with the president, so he isnt going to expound on it. Edwards took advantage of that fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbassman03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Maybe......... Edwards was showing some compassion.....
That thought ever crossed your mind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exJW Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. "I expected you to suck more"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carla in Ca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-06-04 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. Here is a post of mine from earlier today
How about Edwards getting thanked by Cheney for a


nice comment he made about his family? Edwards' response?
"you're welcome, you're welcome".

Kerry and Edwards are two decent, wonderful men who care about the issues that will make us great and proud again.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC