Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oregon Ballot Measure 36: LOL, someone has a sense of humor!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:13 PM
Original message
Oregon Ballot Measure 36: LOL, someone has a sense of humor!
Edited on Thu Oct-07-04 05:34 PM by Stevie D
If you're not from Oregon, stick around. :)

http://www.sos.state.or.us/elections/nov22004/guide/meas/m36_fav.html

One of the most blatant examples of Republican hypocrisy is their party's attempt to make gay marriage an issue in this election. This is obviously reflected at the Federal level by the Defense of Marriage Act.

Oregon has been some kind of weird Petri dish experiment for Republican extremists since 1988 on this issue; we citizens of Oregon have repeatedly beaten back attempts to demonize gays starting with Ballot Measure 9 in 1992.

The latest attempt to deny equal rights to all Oregonians comes in the form of Ballot Measure 36, a clone of the proposed federal constitutional amendment that recently failed in Congress. It is intended to amend the state constitution to define marriage as "between one man and one woman", because of course if this gay nonsense doesn't stop soon, than polygamy, incest, and bestiality will surely follow!

I received my Oregon voters' pamphlet today. This is always a great day in my household, because for $500 anyone can submit an "argument in favor" or "argument in opposition" for inclusion into the voters' pamphlet that will be mailed to EVERY Oregon family with a registered voter.

To make a long story short, Oregon's voters' pamphlet contains the following arguments IN FAVOR of amending the state constitution to ban gay marriage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Argument in Favor

CULTURE WAR!

Traditional values are under attack, and sexual perverts are attempting to strain the definition of marriage far beyond what God has ordained. The Word of the Lord must be legislated as Oregon public policy.

In the Holy Bible, Saint Paul says that Christians should remain single and abstain from sex. The New Testament says that people should get married only if they are too weak-willed to abstain from sex:

"It is well for a man not to touch a woman…. It is well … to remain single as I do. But if they cannot exercise self-control, they should marry. For it is better to marry than to be aflame with passion." (I Corinthians 7:1, 8-9)

Marriage is not sacred. Marriage is for wimps and sissies!

Oregon public policy should define marriage in accordance with divinely inspired Scripture. Therefore, marriage licenses should be granted only to those persons who have been certified by professional psychiatric examination to be too weak-willed to abstain from sex.

Oh, by the way, although Jesus never said a single word condemning homosexuality, if heterosexuals can't get married, homosexuals shouldn't be allowed to marry either—well, unless they're too weak-willed to abstain. Sissies!

The sissy institution of marriage must not be perverted by sinners who are capable of abstaining! The sacred union of church and state must prohibit the immoral union of men and women capable of the discipline of sexual abstinence. We are not saved by either faith or good works. We are saved by religious-right legislation!

Freedom of religion and equal treatment under law is simply the special right to sin, because our tradition is the one and only truth! And our tradition (that is, our personal moral opinions) should become law.

AGREE WITH US OR BURN IN HELL!

(This information furnished by M. Dennis Moore, Traditional Prejudices Coalition.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Argument in Favor

MARRIAGE IS SACRED!

The Bible says that marriage is for procreation. God made Adam and Eve, and Adam and Eve made Cain and Abel, not an empty nest.

Marriage is for procreation. If you're not pro-Creation, you're anti-God. And once a marriage has been solemnized, sex is serious business. The solemnity of sex must not be abused for sinful pleasures. Sex is for procreation, not recreation. And marriage is for breeding purposes.

Therefore, it should be Oregon public policy that

* Homosexuals may not marry.
* Infertile persons may not marry.
* Men with vasectomies may not marry.
* Women with hysterectomies may not marry.
* Post-menopausal women may not marry.
* Persons planning to use birth control may not marry.
* Non-virgins may not marry (Deuteronomy 22:13-21).
* Inter-racial couples may not marry (Deuteronomy 7:3).

And couples who fail to conceive within two years ought to have their marriage licenses revoked.

Additionally, the Bible says that

* Divorced persons may not marry (Luke 16:18).
* And if a man dies without leaving a male heir, it is his brother's responsibility to impregnate the widow (Genesis 38:6-10). If he refuses, he shall be fined one shoe (Deuteronomy 25:5-10).

This is the sacred word of the Lord, steadfast and unchanging.

Traditional morality must become Oregon public policy. All of it. And the older the tradition, the better. The separation of church and state be damned. In order to protect the sanctity of marriage and the sacred institution of heterosexual procreation, unequal treatment and discrimination must be legislated consistently against all persons who cannot or will not breed as God intended. It is God's will that we multiply and fill the Earth and finally subdue it when the population explosion self-implodes. Praise God!

Love is not good enough a reason to marry, because marriage is only for

HETEROSEXUALBREEDING.COM

(This information furnished by M. Dennis Moore, Defense of Heterosexual Breeding Coalition.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Argument in Favor

THE TRADITIONAL FAMILY IS UNDER ATTACK!

Frightening new unprecedented social changes are threatening old traditional values. And these attacks on tradition have been escalating--for millennia!

First there was Original Sin when Eve disobeyed God! Then the Flood! Then Abraham abandoned the traditional practice of human sacrifice! Then Jews instituted the modern covenant of circumcision! Then Moses brought down from Mount Sinai a bunch of new-fangled Laws on stone tablets! And later Jesus abolished them and preached instead the radical new Golden Rule!

Polygamy fell out of favor! Women were no longer mere pieces of property belonging to men! Next these uppity women demanded the right to vote! Families could no longer own slaves! Prohibition saved the family from destruction by Demon Rum! The nineteenth-century extended families on American farms were destroyed by the 1950s social engineering of the "Leave It to Beaver" suburban cookie-cutter nuclear families! Blacks refused to ride in the back of the bus! Women demanded equal pay for equal work! Single parents demanded respect! Gays and lesbians demanded an end to hatred and oppression! Flower children protested traditional mass-murder warfare and genocide! Divorce skyrocketed! The silence surrounding child abuse was broken!

Frightening social changes continued! And then the religious right began a righteous backlash! First they accused gays and lesbians of being promiscuous! And when this failed, they began accusing them of having long-term committed monogamous relationships and wanting to get married!

Where will it all end? After 6,000-some years of frightening attacks on old traditional values, will history never cease to unfold? Will God never stop throwing all of these radical social changes at us?

My friends, there is a simple answer. All you have to do is

VOTE TO TURN THE CLOCK BACK!

It's really that simple!

Now, which one of these radical social changes will this measure turn the clock back to? Oh, come on, let's just

LEAVE IT TO BEAVER!

(This information furnished by M. Dennis Moore, The Beaver State Defense of Beaver Coalition.)

more at link...extra points if you can tell the real arguments in favor from the facetious ones! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Infomaniac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. LOL eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogtag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for posting! Almost makes me want to move to Oregon. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Counsel Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. I Corinthians 7:1, 8-9
Edited on Thu Oct-07-04 05:22 PM by The_Counsel
I remember that scripture. It was written by the Apostle Paul.

If one reads further, he'll find Paul essentially saying that most of that text was his own opinion, and not necessarily the strict Word of the Lord. Scripture with a disclaimer. Gotta love it...

Just something interesting to think about when you hear hatemongers quoting Corinthians... :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prodigal_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Now THAT is an excellent use of
$500.

That is hysterical. I love it. Go Oregon!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Best $500 you could spend
I'm starting to save for two years from now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ghostsofgiants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hahaha
That kicks ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Out the Parasites Donating Member (367 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hey - I haven't gotten my voters pamphlet yet!
I thought for sure it would come today!...and then, no..just bills.

We have one house in my neighborhood with the (One man/One woman) sign surrounded by No on 36.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Hope you get it soon
It's great reading!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. All honor to Wayne Morse
we need him back.

Richard Ray - Jackson Hole, WY
(but born a 3rd generation Oregonian, and I'm coming home in a few years)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Wayne was the man
We need more Wayne Morses, that's for sure. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. lol - I thought this was a joke
Got my Voter's Pamphlet today and it's for real!

30 people/groups wrote in favor of the measure.

37 people/groups wrote in opposition of the measure.


NO ON 36!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Not only is it real, but it costs $500 to put that drivel in
Edited on Sat Oct-09-04 12:41 AM by depakote_kid
the voters' pamphlet. So M. Dennis Moore has not only made a complete idiot of himself in public (or else created a wonderful piece of satire that will go right over the average person's head) but he paid a total of $1,500 for the privilege!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. A little googling finds...
"Agree with us or burn in hell."

That's one argument in support of a measure to ban same-sex marriage that Oregonians will find in the state Voters' Pamphlet next week.

Except it's a hoax.

It is one of four bogus statements that have outraged supporters of Measure 36, which would amend the Oregon Constitution to recognize marriage between only a man and a woman.

"The Bible says that marriage is for procreation," says the phony Defense of Heterosexual Breeding Coalition, adding that Oregon should bar homosexuals, infertile persons, men with vasectomies, and others from marrying.




The other groups formed by the author of the HBC, M. Dennis Moore, a freelance writer and church organist..."

http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=100350
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. How do you suppose this guy landed the first three spots?
The first three Arguments in favor are M. Dennis Moore's. What is it, first come first serve? LOL. Hard to believe that this guy's for real, but with OCA types (or even our Republican legislators) nothing shocks me anymore....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Maybe because he's been at it for a while?
From Oregon Voters' Guide 2000

Measure 9: NO—Result: No
Prohibits public school instruction encouraging, promoting, sanctioning homosexual, bisexual behaviors

Probably unconstitutional, but sadly puritanical either way. Lon Mabon at it again. Read the tongue-in-cheek "Arguments in Favor" by M. Dennis Moore of the Special Righteousness Committee (pages 347-8, 356-357 in the Voters Pamphlet) for the funniest stuff of the election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dem2theMax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
14. I kept looking for the link to The Onion. lol.
What a riot. At first I was thinking these people are nuts. Then I finally realized that the joke is on me. LOL. Thanks for posting. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
18. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC