|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
TryingToWarnYou (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-09-04 07:52 AM Original message |
So I guess Factcheck.org is OK to use now as a source? Minor Rant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
prodigal_green (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-09-04 07:57 AM Response to Original message |
1. Factcheck.org is unbiased |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemonFighterLives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-09-04 08:14 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Thanks for the laugh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eyesroll (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-09-04 08:12 AM Response to Original message |
2. There was some confusion awhile back |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arancaytar (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-09-04 08:20 AM Response to Reply #2 |
4. While factcheck.com appears to have been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostnfound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-09-04 04:41 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Was it REALLY debunked? The hack on TV said 'it was one of ours'.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eyesroll (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-09-04 06:42 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Right here on factcheck.org itself: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
toddaa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-09-04 08:22 AM Response to Original message |
5. Biased Right Wing Front Operations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carson (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-09-04 06:23 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Apparently not. *pointedly* n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starlight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-09-04 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
9. They seem very objective to me. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-09-04 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
10. Obviously, the website has merit, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 07:51 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC