Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush knows his anti-Stem Cell research "Pro-Life" line is a Lie.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 11:14 AM
Original message
Bush knows his anti-Stem Cell research "Pro-Life" line is a Lie.
Rove thinks we're too stupid to see through this lie.

Pro-Life + Pro-War is such an insult to anyone's intelligence and moral maturity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
prole_for_peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. It is total bush it.
Most of these embryos are ready to be discarded anyway. Is it ok to flush them but not use them to save lives???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theorist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Purple Heart Band-Aids = Compassionate Conservatism
Edited on Sat Oct-09-04 11:18 AM by theorist


on edit: The purpose of this is to give another example of how they "care about real Americans in pain".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't understand
why Bush doesn't ban invetro fertilization, since so many embryos needed in the procedure are never ever allowed to develop into people. For that matter, I've never heard a right to lifer condemn this procedure. Wonder why? Couples that can't conceive can adopt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theorist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-09-04 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. But if they can't conceive shouldn't they be forced to divorce?
I thought that was the line of reasoning they used to gain support for the "Defense of Marriage Ammendment". Hmmmm...sounds like yet another predetermined conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC