|
A while back someone posted a list of famous people who are Republicans or lean to the right, the list nor the names are important, what is important is the background of the people on this list. Take for example Ron Silver a New York based actor of Jewish faith. His connection to New York and 9-11 as well as his heritage defines his support of a president who caters to the needs of Israel and feeds of the fears of New Yorkers. The same can be said for Vince Vaughn, a New Yorker. Although not Jewish his support comes from the desire for retribution from 9-11. Names of "action" stars on the list is a more complex issue. They derive their support from the need to have their persona carry over into real life, such as Bruce Willis's attempt to fight in Iraq. It's as if they want to prove to the world they are "true" action hero's, worthy of an Action Figure from Mattel. While this matter may seem trivial to most it has a more heinous consequence, Hollywood has seen "lists" before.
We've all seen it, Bush at the debates tossing the word "liberal" around like it was dirty, Sean Hannity repeating, "the most liberal record of all time", the word is fast becoming the replacement for Communist in certain circles. Some in Hollywood have chosen to distance themselves from it, afraid of being on a "list" of Liberals.
Joe McCarthy, a Senator from Wisconsin once claimed to have such a list. In Wheeling, West Virginia, at the Republican Ladies' Auxiliary Club Dinner in February 1950, the senator from Wisconsin whipped up the crowd when he dramatically waved a sheet of blank typewriter paper over his head and intoned that thereon he held the names of 205 known Reds currently working inside Truman's State Department. The following evening in Salt Lake City the Senator told a similarly enthusiastic gathering that he was hot on the trail of 81 known Communists willingly employed by the Democrats in their State Department. Later, he returned to Washington and confided to overjoyed GOP leaders that he was in pursuit of 57 Communist agents in the State Department. Joe McCarthy was a bumbling drunk during most of his life.
The "Pepsi-Cola-Kid" as he was known by his fellow Senators for taking brides in the controlling of sugar prices was casting about for a sure-fire campaign topic settled on Communism in the state department, just as Bush has grasped the label Liberal.
The climate of fear and anxiety accompanying the growing Cold War rivalry with the now atomically-armed Soviet Union caused many Americans to give credence to any "danger" pointed out to them by an authority figure, such as McCarthy. Which is exactly the same formula George Bush is using to attack Liberals. While it's not Russia and the Cold War, he uses the word terror, and 9-11 in exchange for Communism, Liberal in exchange for Communist. It's this list some in Hollywood are afraid to be on.
The phrase, "McCarthyism" consisted of unsubstantiated charges against a particular individual, then turning the accusations on the challengers, having sufficiently destroyed his original victim's public reputation. Just as Bush and the likes of Fox News has done with John Kerry, throwing the word Liberal at them just as McCarthy did with the word Communist. The ironic part of this story is it took a journalist to stop it, Edward R. Murrow. Will we have our Mr. Murrow?
While we watch the Bush team wave it's blank list of names we must remember, history showed McCarthy to be a drunk, raving lunatic who was censured by Congress. We already know Mr. Bush fits one of those points, will history also prove him to be a raviing lunatic also? George Bush, the new Millennium's McCarthy. Will we have Bush-ism soon?
Michael Harris, and I approve of calling Bush a raving lunitic.
|