|
Edited on Wed Nov-10-04 08:00 PM by JDWalley
...ECUSA (the acronym for the Episcopal Church) and their Canadian counterparts, the Anglican Church of Canada, are liberal enough that the primates of some of the more conservative regions of Anglicanism (particularly Africa and Southeast Asia) recently tried to have us kicked out of the Anglican Communion. The effort failed, but, knowing them, I'm sure they'll keep trying. :eyes:
A word of caution, though: while ECUSA nationwide is progressive, there are a number of dioceses, particulary in Texas and Florida as well as the area around Pittsburgh (for some reason), who seem to want to become Southern Baptists with more elaborate ceremony, and who attack the national church on a regular basis. So, if you live in any of those areas, you may need to choose your parish carefully.
At this point, same-sex blessings are not officially among the church's liturgies, but are done pretty openly in various congregations. (I should note that the Canadian Diocese of New Westminster -- Vancouver and British Columbia -- has officially approved a same-sex blessing liturgy for the entire diocese.) Women can hold all positions in ECUSA, including the office of Bishop. On abortion, they have the same sort of "middle-ground" position typical of mainstream churches (or Democratic politicians) -- they are not in favor of abortion in principle, but don't think it should be outlawed. (I remember a General Convention resolution from about twenty-five years ago, stating that the only generally-justifiable grounds for abortion were when the mother's life was in danger, the pregnancy was the result of rape or incest, or tests showed that the child would have severe birth defects. In all other cases, the parishoners were urged to consult with their priest.)
The book you mention was written by retired Bishop John Shelby Spong. I'm not too impressed with his writings -- even when I agree with his conclusions, I don't see much of a chain of logic in the way he reaches them, and he also has a distressing tendency to pigeonhole people and attack his potential opponent's character (suggesting that disagreeing with him automatically makes you sexist, racist, homophobic, anti-Semitic, or a fundamentalist) in a manner that's not all that different from right-wing "thought." There are many better liberal Christian voices in ECUSA -- my first suggestion would be Marcus Borg.
|