Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wes Clark is an Idiot

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:01 PM
Original message
Wes Clark is an Idiot
On Tweety, the discussion turned to gay rights and Clark says it really hit home with him when he heard some black female fundie preacher say "God made Adam and Eve, Not Adam and Steve."
Wes said this really made him understand the folks who don't like gay marriage.

Putting aside that Wes hasn't heard thr old Adam and Steve chestnut which has been around for 25 or more years and has been used by a succession of homophobes, I think Wes just screwed his chances of running for President again as a Democrat. This one is going to take a lot of time and effort to explain away, and I doubt gay folks and friends and family of gay folks are going to respond to this kind of naked ignorance/bigotry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NightTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Clark really said that?!
Edited on Thu Nov-11-04 08:07 PM by NightTrain
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:04 PM
Original message
I thought I was watching radical cleric Pat Robertson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
24. Oh come on, you're blowing this WAY out of proportion
Edited on Thu Nov-11-04 08:15 PM by high density
Wes Clark said there is a long way to go regarding gay marriage or civil unions and used that quote to emphasize his point. Given that 11 states banned gay marriage last week I'd say he's right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #24
30. Oh Please, STOP IT! Wes Was Talking About How OTHERS
understand the concept.

What the HELL IS WRONG with DU'ers sometimes.

I swear to fucking dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #30
47. He didn't dispute it. He just used the line and then
he said it's when the issue really came home to him.

WATCH THE REPEAT.

He was referring to HIS "enlightenment". ANd if it was his "enlightenment" of how bigoted others are, that's what he should have said.

He didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. Yeah...
It showed him how fucked up most of the people are in this country.

What's your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. That's not what he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #54
74.  He ALSO didn't say...
"this really made him understand the folks who don't like gay marriage....and goddamn I agree with then 100%"

That's not what he said either. But that's what you're implying. Deliberately. Even though it isn't honest.

All you had to do is listen to Wesley Clark on the campaign trail to hear his position on gays. If you can't be bothered to do that much investigation before posting bullshit, then you're not worth anyone's attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #47
53. Advocate Mag put Wes on their cover...you didn't understand
the complexities of the interview kid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #53
56. Sorry, I understood it fully n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #56
69. Read this interview:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #56
70. You don't understand a damn thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #56
87. nope, even gays say hes pro gay. duh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juliagoolia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #30
58. NO KIDDING>>
I agree.. look the man is saying...

I DIDNT REALIZE PEOPLE THOUGHT THIS WAY>>

AS IN>>

I DIDNT REALIZE THERE WERE SO MANY BIGOTS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #30
65. It's deliberate.
There are some fucking assholes around here deliberately trying to act like fucking idiots to try and stir up stupid shit.

Don't let it get to you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #65
96. Haha, I didn't take my own advice...
I've let it get to me. :P

Ok, I'm leaving and hiding this thread now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedoll78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #30
110. A-friggin'-men!
It's all about context.

From my homo perspective, I understand what Clark meant. "Bumpersticker logic" is a biiiiig tool for keeping the argument simplistic enough for most Republicans to understand..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sandpiper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Way to pander Wes
Like there's anybody who's never heard the "Adam and Steve" line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. You can understand how people think without agreeing with them
Edited on Thu Nov-11-04 08:15 PM by xray s
I think you are being too harsh on Wes. he has been an advocate for gay rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnfantTerrible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. I saw that too...
Made me cringe and I think he knew he stepped in it by Tweetie's letting the "joke" lay there like a festering turd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. Huh? Way to much inferring there. I didn't see the show, but it sounds to
me that Clark isn't commenting on the content of that quote, but the context. He's saying that a core Democratic demographic (a black woman) sees this not as a civil rights issue but as values/religion issue, which shows what a struggle it's going to be for Democrats to explain the core issue to voters.

I think you're overreacting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnfantTerrible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
29. Actually that's not that how went down...
Edited on Thu Nov-11-04 08:17 PM by Qst4Q
He set up the "joke" by saying that a minister in an African American church he visited summed up the matter of gay marriage best by saying, "God made Adam and Eve. Not Adam and Steve". Now he may have been ATTEMPTING what you suggest, but it was a miserable failure if that is the case.

on edit: I will add that I personally don't think Clarke is anti-gay, but the comment was in poor taste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Like I said, I didn't see it.
Edited on Thu Nov-11-04 08:22 PM by AP
But the quoted part above suggests where Clark was almost definitely headed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #29
48. Actually, not exactly
He said the view of the religious was "brought home to him" when a woman in a black church... made the Adam & Steve remark. He was talking about where the country is on gay marriage. Not saying these were his own views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EnfantTerrible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #48
64. I didn't hear him say
his view of the religous. If he did, then I missed it. I'm gonna watch it again on the replay later tonight. You may be right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #64
116. That was the WHOLE conversation
That's what it was about. The view of people on gay marriage. Since he was talking about a woman in CHURCH, well duh, that's the views of the religious. Criminy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #48
79. If you repeat a bigoted slur
like the one he used, instead of saying it came home to him how the country felt about this when he heard it, he should have said what a shame that people are bigots, or i disagree with what she said, but their bigotry came through, or when i heard it, i understood the passion on the other side, even though i think it's wrong

he said NONE of those things. He just repeated what this woman said and then said it "really came home to him" listening to her.

Anyone who is interpreting this as his way of saying that the woman was wrong but he understood her is free to interpret it that way, but those are not the words he uttered. He spoke as if his feelings had been changed by listening to these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #79
112. Yes he did
He said all of that before he made that comment. In fact, he used words incredibly close to "understanding the passion on the other side", right before he made the Adam & Steve comment. It was the whole point of his remarks. The country has some pretty strong feelings about gay marriage, whether one agrees or disagrees with those feelings. It's a fact. That's all he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. I think that I would rather depend on the transcript than on a ...
characterization.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billbuckhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. The Clenis told him to do it
I hope Wes is running for Senator in Arkansas. If he is, he can't win in Arkansas being pro gay marriage. Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:15 PM
Original message
No seats are up or vulnerable. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
34. Wes was just stating the mindset he ran into during the campaign
It was a valid observation on how some people react to the gay marraige issue. He didn't say he agreed with it.

It seems to me its better to know how people think, than just ignore it.

Besides, the "God created Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve" stuff doesn't make sense. If God created the whole wide world, he created both straight and gay.

Maybe God is watching how straights treat gays according to his greatest commandment, something about loving your neighbor as yourself. It seems to me some straights prefer hate instead.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hmmm...sounds to me as though he might have been expressing merely
some understanding of others and tolerance of their opinions; I didn't hear him on Tweety so will have to watch it later to hear what else he had to say. I don't think it was bigotry, knowing other statements that he has made, but will reserve judgment.

I would like to think that tolerance of dissenting opinions is still a Democratic virtue; God knows the ReThuglicans have no time for anyone who does not toe the party line (unless you're a celebrity, and then they will shamelessly use you to whore for them even if your views have no place in their 'big tent....')
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. Sista Soulja moment
bank on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think he's talking about marriage in the religious sense.
Edited on Thu Nov-11-04 08:08 PM by high density
(Obviously)

Plus Tweety cut off whatever else he was going to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. Look out, you're gonna get flamed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
33. As Well The Original Poster SHOULD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. Gays voted for Bush in droves. Wes is for CU like Kerry..(edit typo)
Edited on Thu Nov-11-04 08:11 PM by xultar
get it straight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Kerry was for CU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Who told you that Kerry is for same-sex marriage?
Edited on Thu Nov-11-04 08:10 PM by NightTrain
Kerry has clearly stated more than once that he supports civil unions but not same-sex marriage. Personally, I'd respect him more if he did support it, but whatcha gonna do? :shrug:

Also, where did you learn that "gays voted for Bush in droves?" I find that highly unlikely!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. Huh? When did Kerry say he was in favor of gay marriage?
enlighten us, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. 25% is droves?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #26
43. It is enough to make it a Kerry victory? then it is a DROVE...with close
elections like recently every vote counts.

so DROVE it is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #43
113. I dont' think there was ONE group to vote in more numbers
for Kerry than gays with the exception of blacks and, possibly, jews.

Learn where your bread is buttered. It ain't cool to offend people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. I still haven't seen objective proof of all these gay voting for Bush
in droves...were any demographics done on this? In what regions of the country did they vote for Bush in droves. I am as suspect of this figure as I am about the so called youth vote not materializing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #11
80. Show me one shred of evidence of "in droves"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonicx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. what else did he say about gay rights...
full context please. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. Why are you so offended at that remark?
Sure, it's rather simpleton to say that such an age-old commonplace homophobic slur would be enlightening. But even if he said it helped him "understand" the opposition to gay marriate, does that necessarily mean he was sympathetic to that position?

By the way, i have never been a HUGE Clark guy. Just looking for answers...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Would you have been offended
if he said he heard some white guy say "blacks like fried chicken and have too many babies" and so he can really understand why some whites think blacks are inferior. It all came home to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
35. Point taken, ruggerson. Clearly, if he did not follow that comment up
with a vigorous defense of tolerance and equal rights in light of such narrow-minded, hateful attitudes he deserves big time scorn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. no, there was no defense of anything
tweety smirked and that was the end of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #42
50. Ok then. I'm with you on the "Wes Clark is an idiot" bandwagon.
Not at all cool on his part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #42
60. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
63. No,
It would be like him saying, the views of Oklahomans were really brought home to me when Coburn said "blacks are genetically predispositioned to die early." And wow, Oklahoma elected that guy. If someone made that comment and connection, doesn't mean they approve of racism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #63
75. EXACTLY!!!! YOU NAILED IT!!!! WES CLARK OVERFLOWS WITH INTEGRETY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #63
85. THIS IS SO OBVIOUSLY TRUE THAT IT IS RIDICUOUS TO WASTE TIME ON THIS

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
15. black churches have been instrumental in passing gay marriage bans
The fundamentalist blacks aren't any more forgiving of homosexuality than fundamentalist whites. Sorry. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think that one originated from the evangelical pulpits going back to...
...Billy Graham Sr if I remember correctly so it's been around for much of my 63 years on this planet. That has also been a standing bigoted joke against gays in military social circles for decades. Maybe Wes Clark plans to pull a Zell Millar manuever and move over to the dark side. Military pensions for retired generals are a little lean without big corporate connections. But I can forgive Wes Clark if he admits that he did it jst to pull Tweety's chain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
19. If you can't understand the arguments the other side uses
and believes, you can't compete -- period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
22. He MEANT that he was HORRIFIED that people could think that way!!!
I saw that interview and when he said that he shook his head and looked amazed.

Wes Clark was on the cover of a Gay and Lesbian Magazine for Christ sake. You obviously are trying to slander Wes Clark or you cant read body language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GainesT1958 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
23. What hit home with him...
Edited on Thu Nov-11-04 08:12 PM by GainesT1958
Was how deeply ingrained the PREDJUDICE is against gay folks from many sectors of society...NOT that HE wanted to be a homophobe!x(

He's already stated what he thought of that predjudice when he ran in the primaries..and reitterated it several times since. He said how much he detested it in the Army when he was in...and what he told an officer about confronting the possibility of a child of his being gay. Gen. Clark is NOT a biggot in any way, and he's most certainly NOT a homophobe, either!

He's a brave, patriotic veteran who believes in equality and NOT in pre-emptive PNAC wars...a helluva lot more than I can say for the homophobic, AWOL little moron occupying the West Wing right now!:mad:

B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HoosierClarkie Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
25. Actually Wes Clark
was in favor of possibly getting rid of the "don't ask don't tell" policy in the military and having a more open gay policy. So, I do not think that he is ignorant or a bigot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
28. He didn't get to finish his comment, Tweety cut him off
He was trying to explain what this minister was saying and how it clarified how these people felt about the issue when tweety cut him off right after he made that comment. It was obvious he had more to say. Stop bashing him and think for a moment.

Wes Clark is hardly an idiot, and his position on gay marriage was that they should not only have civil unions with full rights, but that if they wanted to get married, that was entirely up to the church that did so, it wasn't the government's business.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. Tweety knew he had a killer soundbyte and wasn't going to let Clark
finish a thought which might make the soundbyte ineffective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. Exactly, and I knew someone at DU would pick up on it
And distort the whole thing.

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #44
66. Everyone probably knows...
...that I don't think Clark would be the best person to run at the top of the ticket, but that doesn't mean I'm going to sit on the sidelines and watch people make ridiculous arguments tearing down good democrats and try to drive BS wedges into the left without commenting on it. I've noticed that 65% of what's happened on DU in the past week tends to be one or both of those things. I guess the sharks smell the Democratic blood in the water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #66
73. AP
thanks for tellin like you see it. We may see differently on "the top of the ticket" but we still have to stick together as a party.

BTW, you might want to update your avatar now, I just changed mine back.

Cya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #66
103. That's a class post, AP
Thanks!

By the way, I got an email from Elizabeth Edwards today, & I sent her my best wishes for a quick recovery.

She is a terrific lady, & has lots of spunk!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #103
109. Yup. I hope we Clark supporters remember it
When one of us feels the nee to talk about "channeling babies."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
32. Let's see
Jesus was a young man who was never married, hung around with a pack of guys.

Now what was that all about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
36. You just mischaracterized the entire thing
You obviously know nothing about Wes Clark & his positions...

Wes is not the idiot...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
37. I have more faith in Wes Clark than I do in this post
Wes Clark should be our candidate in 2008. In fact he should start campaigning immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
39. Clarkies - We know what the deal is...Clark didn't say anything
different that what anyone else has said.

Please let these people have their moment to do what ever it is they need to do to blame whomever it is they need to blame for what ever it is that needs a scapegoat.

Clark has done alot for Gay soldiers in the military. He's counseled and wants people to serve who want to serve. HE's done more good things than many people for gays in the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piperay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
40. Phooey
you shouldn't take things out of context!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
41. Wesley Clark Spoke Fairly Openly About Dealing With Gays In Military
He has the concept of "Don't Ask, Don't Act Up" for gays in the military, for instance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
45. That is so out of freakin' context...
...I saw the interview, and he had a look of disbelief on his face before he said that. The point he was trying to get across, is that was an insight as to the WHY evangelicals are against gay marriage, not that HE was against gay marriage. For corns sake the guy is a Rhodes Scholar, and has been on the cover of Gay and Lesbian Magazine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
46. This thread needs to be locked, it's pure slander! I saw that interview!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #46
51. You're going to silence people
because you don't like their views? Get a grip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HoosierClarkie Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. You are calling him and Idiot and a BIGGOT!!!
You get a grip!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #55
61. Did you watch what he just said???????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HoosierClarkie Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #61
91. I do not watch Tweety
because he was unfair to Wes during the primaries. hmmm...I bet he was tonight too. I did not have to watch what he said to know that the man is NOT a biggot or an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #51
77. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #51
88. Yes. We silence obvious disruptors all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #46
59. Fuck that. I didn't see the interview and am totally interested in what
was said. Based on things so far, Wes has some 'splainin to do.

If you think differently, love to hear it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #59
72. no, fuck THAT ...
read the rest of the thread rather than tag-teaming with friend Ruggerson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #72
90. Thanks but I'm all over this thread and was there early on with skepticism
about Clark-bashing.

I was responding to the call to lock the thread because the poster didn't like the content. That's where my "FUCK THAT" was directed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
49. !!!!!WES WAS ON THE COVER OF ADVOCATE!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #49
57. Ah yes...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #57
76.  Did you HAVE to post that pic??
Damn, he's good lookin'! :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
62. Tweety didn't let Clark finish his statement.
Edited on Thu Nov-11-04 08:32 PM by Connie_Corleone
After the Adam-Steve comment, Clark was getting ready to say something else, but big mouth Tweety interrupted him and asked him about giving advice to the troops in Fallujah.

Clark also said that most of the country is not ready for gay marriage YET, but that civil unions could be a possibility.

Clark was just saying how there are still alot of people opposed to gay marriage and the Adam-Steve comment is used to justify their position. Unfortunately, we'll never know what else Clark was about to say after that.

I think he was going to make a point about God DID make Adam and Steve!!

Pay more attention to the "context" next time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Nelson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #62
83. WES & CHRIS & EVE & ADAM
I saw that -- I don't think Wesley Clark meant to be bigoted. Matthews didn't let him finish the story. He has spoken about this topic before & expanded on this story. That was part of a story on how to get from one view to be more accepting. He's trying to reel support in...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
67. Well you have to really WANT it to read it that way
It takes a very concentrated and deliberate act of extreme willpower to twist what was said into the interpretation you've given.

I salute you with three fingers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
68. You're reading too much into this
It sounds to me like Wes understands that there are indeed people out there that don't like gay marriage. Well, DUH! Guess what? There are many people that, sadly, lose sleep at night over this bullshit wedge issue. I personally don't care what two consenting adults do with their lives. I've got my own life to live, and I don't understand why people have to stick their noses in everyone's business. But I do understand that there are people with that mentality.

And so does Gen. Clark. I don't see anything bigoted in realizing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dookus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
71. I just watched it
and you couldn't be more wrong.

He was using it to introduce a point, and Matthews cut him off, so he didn't get to finish it.

Clark isn't a bigot and he sure isn't an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #71
86. Good
I knew it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
78. I suggest you watch the "Rock the Vote" debate if you want to ...
know Wes Clark's thoughts on the discrimination of gays instead of taking what he said on Tweety's show out of context. Wes Clark gave a very eloquent answer to a question on gays at that debate which left NO question on which side of the question he is on. He is, in no way, in the anti-gay corner!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
81. I'm going to watch the replay at 10:00 Est
And I won't hesitate to post the transcript when its available to show that you have distorted Clark's response. You must not have been payin attention during the primaries. Clark was one of the most open and honest candidates about Gay rights issues in the past election, certainly out of the top 4 candidates. He really believes in civil rights. He will be there when GLBT need support in the political arena. It sounds to me like he was making an honest assessment of our country's current morass on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eaprez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
82. I think his point was not WHAT was said but that a person of the cloth....
...made the remark. THAT was a light bulb moment for him in which he fully understood how deep the hatered is --- if you have a so called person of God, who is also from one of the most discriminated classes in the country preaching this stuff - its not an easy issue to reconcile with a segment of society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #82
84. THEN HE SHOULD HAVE SAID THAT
He didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #84
89. he was cut off ... quit hyperventilating ...
breathe in a paper sack for a few minutes and tune down your outrage. He was not allowed to finish his point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #89
95. I think you're misapplying your anger
Up until tonight I had no feelings about Clark either way. I would have supported him, had he gotten the nomination. I thought he was a good man, not a very experienced politician, who seemed to be a quick learner on the campaign trail.

What he said tonight was idiotic, despite all the spin and dodging you see here.

And if his character is anything like the rabid, ugly wolves his supporters seem to be, it's going to drive even more people away.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #95
108. nope, their anger is appropriately applied
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #84
92. Once again...
If you were really paying attention, you would have seen that Tweety did NOT let him finish. He was about to say something else, but Tweety cut him off!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selwynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #84
94. Listen champ, ONCE AGAIN:
All you had to do is listen to Wesley Clark on the campaign trail to hear his position on gays. If you can't be bothered to do that much investigation before posting bullshit, then you're not worth anyone's attention.

You have CHOSEN to interpret comments that could be taken two different ways in a way that COMPLETELY CONTRADICTS STANCES AND POSITIONS CLARK HAS REPEATEDLY GIVEN.

And I therefore question your motives, dub you a disrupter, and invite you to please embrace my hairy ass in all its grandure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eaprez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #84
98. then he was wrong to suppose the audience had critical thinking skills
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
93. Is This How A Rhodes Scholar Explains His Positions?
God didn't create Adam & Steve? Actually God did create both Adam & Steve along with everyone else. I saw the interview and thought it was just another example of the dem leadership's effort to pander to the right. First Clinton, now Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #93
97. It's kind of hard to explain your positions
when the host of the show cuts you off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #93
99. Ah, the trolls are out in force tonight. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #99
105. Trolling Has Nothing To Do With It.
I saw it , didn't like it and have as much right to say so as anyone else has to express their opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #93
101. You and Ruggerson are the only two people on the planet that read it that
way. You two seem to want to take Clark down for some reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #101
111. Having A "Minority" Opinion
doesn't make one wrong. This last election is proof of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #111
120. No but being wrong makes you wrong. WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG
WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG,WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG,WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG,WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG,WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG,WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG,WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG,WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG,WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG,WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG,WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG,WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG,WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG,WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG, WRONG,:spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank: :spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #93
102. Oh, for Heaven's sake!!
Where in the interview did you hear Clark say that "God didn't create Adam and Steve" was HIS position?

I didn't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #102
107. Why did he repeat the slur?
Do you understand how offensive it is? Not that it matters, but it's the exact same slur that basically ended Donna Summer's career about twenty years ago, when SHE became "born again".

Think before you speak. Especially if you want to be a leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #107
115. It's quite obvious you are willingly ignoring the real issue,
Because you wouldn't be acting this way after several of us who watched the same damn interview saw that Clark was cut off before he finished the story!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #115
118. You're HOPING that what it appeared he said
he did not mean.

I'm reacting to what I heard.

If he comes out tomorrow and clarifies it, I'll be more than happy to listen to what he has to say. But he did NOT say that he disagreed with this woman, and those who are intepreting it that way are doing so with the HOPES that that is what he meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #118
119. We've actually been listening to this man since last summer.
We KNOW what his position is on gay marriage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #119
125. Well then one of you get in touch with him
and tell him not to use age old bigoted offensive slurs to make a political point. I'm sick and tired of my family being under attack by one nitwit after another. It would be nice to see ONE of these politicians stand up and say, you know what, this discussion about the negative political ramifications of gay marriage sucks, because MORALLY it's the right thing to stand for and these are real Americans, with real lives and we've got to stop treating them like political footballs.

It gets real old after a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LandOLincoln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #118
122. You're either being deliberately obtuse,
or you're a troll.

Have you even bothered to read the links posted for your edification and enlightenment? Do you understand that you're attempting to argue with people who know Wes Clark's positions cold? Why is there no concession on your part that you could have misunderstood his remarks?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #122
126. Because I have ears
and I heard what he said. And you're not going to convince me that he said "black" when he said "white".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #93
121. The post does not contain FACTS...check the facts first...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #93
123. And Kerry said that all soldieers committed atrocities
GET REAL!

Clark was repeating what someone else said and commenting on it. GOD DAMN IT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #93
124. deleted
Edited on Thu Nov-11-04 09:02 PM by Jim4Wes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
100. Nah...not a clark fan at all
but a bigot he ain't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoveTurnedHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #100
104. Come On, Forkboy, Come Out of the Closet!
You know you just WUUUUUUUV Wes Clark! :D

DTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #104
114. Forkboy will admit it eventually
we just have to give him time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #104
117. I think the original post should get an award for being the most wrong
Edited on Thu Nov-11-04 08:51 PM by Quixote1818
interpretation of a political situation ever posted on DU.

:hurts: :hurts: :hurts: :hurts: :hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phylla Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
106. I wasn't in the least upset by his remarks.
Wes is a pragmatist. He said that the country clearly is not ready for gay marriage.
I think that the country pretty well made that point on election day.

Wes was proactive for gay rights when he was in the service and is today.

So calm down.

If Wes decides to throw his hat in the ring again, I will be right there with him.

He is the simply the one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
127. Locking
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC