Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

any five people can request a recount apparently

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-11-04 10:32 PM
Original message
any five people can request a recount apparently
From Stephanie Low:

Subject: Laws allow citizens to request recounts...

in various states. In Ohio, only 5 people who voted for the person who was not declared the winner are needed to request a recount. It has to be paid for however. In Ohio it's $10 per precinct--with more than 11,000 voting precincts in Ohio there is a fundraising effort going on to get this going. A for-real 527 tax exempt organization is set up for this purpose only. Their web site went up today, and details recount efforts in other states.

http://www.helpamericarecount.org/

(FYI: Keep trying with the site if you get a weird message. Apparently a number of sites related to this subject are being hacked over and over to deny access--especially www.blackboxvoting.org. If you want to see what's been on their site, do a Google search for the web address but not with ".com" that's a fake site meant to distract, and look at "cached" which gives you a saved version of the most recent site that managed to struggle to the web surface before being shut down by partisan hackers again).

In Ohio they will start with the precincts with the most outrageous results and move forward as further precinct counting funds come in.

Some people say "move on" or "get over it" or you're being a "sore loser." It's not about being "sore losers." It's about the backbone of our democracy having fallen prey to manipulation and chaos! If the recount keeps Bush as winner, so be it. The electronic voting and the dysfunctional and completely different methods of voting across the country need to be addressed anyway. How will anyone trust the results in the future without an investigation and movement to standardize Federal elections?

Please forward the like-minded if possible.

Your Political-Pain-in-the-Behind or Helpful-Information-Provider
...(you choose!),

Kate

P.S. Alberto Gonzalez, who as White House Counsel called the Geneva Conventions "quaint" and not applicable in the "war on terror" has just been named Attorney General. I hope he doesn't start singing about eagles like Ashcroft. Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC