For details, see
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A31016-2004Nov6.htmlI guess this means that president pinhead has commanded that no signs of dissent be visible on Mandate Inauguration Day. Can't have an embarassing moment like back in 2001 when tens of thousands showed up to give him the finger and egged his car....
To FBI who are monitoring DU -- aww, come on -- do you guys REALLY think "Al Qaeda" is considering an attack on the inaugural balls, etc? I KNOW most FBI agents are very smart cookies, quite on top of things and some weirded out by how they have been directed and misdirected to act against "terrierists" and peaceniks and hookers while all sorts of heavy shit is going down -- but that you have some pretty stupid ideologically driven leadership who sabotages your great work, who later blame **you** when the heavy shit does come down from **their** bad decisions..... (we READ, so we know). Yeah yeah, maybe there is a REMOTE infinitissimal chance of some jihadist considering mayhem on King Smirk's Coronation Mandate Day of Glory -- but let's be real -- any "trouble" --let's be frank and honest -- what will occur will be peaceful, albeit clear, protests of loyal American citizens who will peacefully exercise their now increasingly mythological rights to free speech against bad government. King George is commanding that a photo-op of consensus and mandate occurs on his Coronation, oops, I meant Inauguration, Day.
FBI -- you KNOW we are not bad people -- that we have grievances, and not bad intentions, against the Bush adminstration. American to American, we are calling upon you to be fair and just in assessing the risk from your fellow Americans who simply dissent.
Indeed -- freedom isn't free -- and there are those of us who are planning to be present that day en masse (excuse my French) to declare our opposition to the extremist policies of this administration. Will you accept orders to hurt us, arrest us if we are not violent but simply dissenting, herd us like sheep away from public venues to deliver the media a Disneyland version of a happy happy consensual unanimous America behind a Harvard MBA chosen by God Himself, when we are in fact deeply divided? Are you okay with "Free Speech Zones" away from venues -- and if so, why?
Pardon my cynicism, but in my humble opinion, "fear" over the coronation,ops sorry again I MEANT inauguration, as expressed in the WaPo link cited above, is far more about enabling a mythical media photo-op of MandateTM than REALLY protecting His Chimperial Highness, or his Court from actual danger. Heck -- he's a guy who's too chicken to face press conferences, for heavens sakes, or even address the Parliament of our closest ally, Great Britain, or even allow people who do not sign a loyalty oath to attend his invitation-only rallies -- so the idea that he takes ANY chances to risk his pink fuzzy peach frat boy ass and stock options is laughable.... He is so cowardly he must make your job very easy....
Again, FBI -- consider this -- 500,000 STRONGLY anti-Bush people protested peacefully in NYC during the RNC. Proportionally speaking, the "troublemakers" were an extremely small percentage of this massive assembly. I think this goes to show that we are decent law-abiding Americans -- so, again, American to American, keep the peace as is your job, but let us speak as is our right (still?) as Americans.
Will you please honor your promise to protect the Constitutional rights of your fellow Americans, as well as protecting the ruling elite that day? I hope so.