Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Regressives" seems to be catching on

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
johntao Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 01:23 AM
Original message
"Regressives" seems to be catching on
Edited on Fri Nov-12-04 01:27 AM by johntao
Perhaps we should all continue to call the Republican Party "regressives". How's this for a definition?

Definition:
Regressives = 1) a group of people seeking to establish a society likened to that seen before the Age of Reason. 2) Those who lack reason. 3) Medieval Americans 4) Those who believe in an "Ownership Society" including the reintroduction of the "Serf" 5) Backwards thinking
antonym: Progressive (see Liberal)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Do NOT forget the all-important
Edited on Fri Nov-12-04 01:25 AM by billyoc
antonym: Progressive(see liberal).

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. I like it!
Edited on Fri Nov-12-04 01:27 AM by NCevilDUer
They've been shaping the conversation, if you can call it that, for years. We should do our bit.

Regressives!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I like it, too.
Regressive is also a reference to childish and immature behavior. Apt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's black and white for ya.
All right there in the dictionary, it's mind boggeling to see it and know that their perception is soooooooooo messed up, they actually do see it backward.

Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think it fits them perfectly.
Let's take back the language and let ourselves do some of the defining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. Seems to be the perfect definition..
Fits them to a "T".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. Keep it up
Work it into conversations.
On the net, refer to conservatives solely as regressives. Never say conservative again. Rarely say neocon.
We need to blast this word into the public debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prairierose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I was thinking about this today...
& I thought of regressive theocrats.
What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone Pawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. I don't think theocrat will catch on outside of progressive circles
It's already a loaded word. We need to find a word with moderate-neutral-negative connotations, and then define it as it's being accepted. Regressive works wonderfully.

I also think we need to start calling ourselves something along the line of true patriots or real patriots. Take love of nation back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC