Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Am I wrong to believe that this Peterson thing is really about abortion?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:20 PM
Original message
Am I wrong to believe that this Peterson thing is really about abortion?
Edited on Fri Nov-12-04 03:21 PM by dnvechoes
Everyone's abuzz about the Peterson verdict, but none of them really understand why this is such a monumental case. Thousands of murders occur every year, why has the media latched on to this one?

I say, it's because of the implications if he is found guilty of TWO counts of murder - his wife and the unborn baby. If he is, it will go all the way back up to the Supreme Court, and they'll have to address Roe v. Wade again.

Am I wrong, or am I the only one seeing this?

david

Edit: spelling Peterson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
physioex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Could be....
Like I have said pick a good looking white woman who can sell tabloids and ad space then hype the hell out of the story. Funny how we never hear about a poor hispanic or black woman in a urban area in similar situations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ain't that the truth n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skylarmae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. you guys might be right; but, as she was almost eight months
pregnant and it occurred on Christmas Eve, I'd like to think that, these facts flamed the fire and boom. Not to mention he says he was fishing 90 miles away on X-mas eve and then the bodies just happen to wash up in the same place.

However, the 'fetus is a baby' argument is valid, as you suggest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. I agree with you
I posted a similar thread a couple of days ago and got flamed for it, but I do think the one verdict versus two is potentially huge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. you are 100% correct!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. charging him with 2 murders was surely about abortion...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. yes it is, get him for two murders
on court has been established that fetus is life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. The greatest cause of death in pregnant women is murder,
usually by the baby's father. That's the main thing they have going for them in the Peterson case, the statistics. It doesn't seem that they have much in the way of forensic evidence.

I don't think this is about abortion any more than the murder of any anonymous pregnant woman is. This one's glitzy because she was a real looker and because they seemed like "nice" suburbanites.

When women can't face the consequences of an unplanned and unwanted pregnancy, they choose abortion. When men feel trapped by a pregnancy, whether or not it was a wanted one, they murder. That should be what this case is about, not the minutiae surrounding a pretty young white woman's death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shimmergal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Actually, there's a bunch of reasons for big press coverage.
Besides the pregnancy, Lacie disappeared on Christmas Eve, and both of the couple were super attractive and photogenic. I personally think the latter was most important--we know how the media grooves on "beautiful people."

Yeah, men sometimes murder when they feel trapped by a pregnancy, but they DO have another option--divorce. Too bad (if he did it) Scott didn't opt for divorce instead. Caddish behavior, to spring it on his wife just before or after the baby was born, but not nearly as bad as murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. You're at least partly right.
This may not be used as a RvW challenge, but it WILL be cited as precedent by one that does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rowire Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. FREE SCOTT
If this case is about abortion, I hope Petersen walks. Maybe then, the religious freaks will feel some of my pain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Hee hee
Well, they could just find him guilty and then rule that since the fetus wasn't born yet, it doesn't have rights extended to actual Americans, and he is guilty of murder and the 2nd charge of murder was ill-conceived.

That would be a pretty good verdict.

david
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
erniesam Donating Member (120 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-12-04 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. You are right. Just listen to how its discussed on Fox news.
They, repeatedly, refer to the murder of a little baby boy. So now in one of the most liberal states in the union we have legal precedent for the killing of a fetus to be crime in at least the second degree with special circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC