Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why don't the Fundies try to ban VASECTOMY?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 04:54 PM
Original message
Why don't the Fundies try to ban VASECTOMY?
Edited on Sat Nov-20-04 04:57 PM by Stephanie


Just asking. I wonder why?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sorry, rules on planet earth-can't mess w/male reproduction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Not yet....BUT it's coming!
http://www.news-leader.com/today/1112-Malebirthc-224660.html

Why would any single woman TRUST that a man took his pill......when she is the ONE whom will get pregnant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. No, it's not
No coming allowed in Jesusland. What you meant to say it that it's nigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jazzgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
35. I saw that news-leader link and went hmmm....
Edited on Sat Nov-20-04 06:42 PM by Jazzgirl
Springfield News and Leader is the only one I know, LOL! I was right! Can't believe they talked about it though my Mom did used to write LTTE's to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
36. I'd trust my husband to take them
He wants to delay having children more than me. In fact, I'd prefer it. I am questioning whether or not some of my current health problems might be, inpart, side effects of the pill.
I think that it would be a good option for married couples who want to delay child bearing and trust each other as well as single men who want to assure that they won't father children. If I were a single woman though, I probably would want a back up method of my own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrUnderhill Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's the Catholics.
Fundamentalists (most - there are exceptions) don't have a problem with artificial contraception.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. They will,give them time
My last child was born in 1957, I had to have my husband, and I think it was three doctors sign my papers to have a Tubal Ligation ...because of health problems, some people don't realize just how few years back it was that there were laws concerning birth control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barb162 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
28. I think within a year we will have an abortion ban
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. control
because they do not care about babies or children or any of that crap.
it is about controlling women.

men getting snipped would be a horror -- women could have sex knowing getting pregnant is impossible. the religiously insane don't want that.

(i had a vasectomy in 1998. it's a good idea.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. less pregnancies = less wage slaves
but you already knew that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. What? Mess with the Mighty Scepter Of Gawd?
Edited on Sat Nov-20-04 05:02 PM by TahitiNut
The Sansabelt Excalibur? Sap their vital juices? Plug their purity of essence? What would Rosie Palm and her five daughters say? :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. An Interesting Question, Ma'am
It is not too dissimilar to wondering why they do not agitate to ban divorce. Vasectomy is certainly opposed to the spirit of the sexual regulations of the Old Testament, and would probably count towards barring any man who hadd undergone the procedure from approaching the altar or entering a place of worship. Divorce, though regulated in the Old Testament, is specifically forbidden by the words of the Christ in the Gospels.

The reason, of course, is simply that, whatever these reptiles claim as their motive, and as justification for their views, their real purpose is simply the re-imposition of chattel status on women: that is the sum of morality for them, all else is window-dressing....

"The mind wobbles...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sangh0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
32. Another question - Why do they oppose prenatal aid?
I smell some wedge issues, but this time, they're ours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hasbro Donating Member (258 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's my fear
I don't want to be a parent, don't feel I'll be a capable parent, and adpotion makes more sense to me given my genetics. So I plan on having a vasectomy.

That's one reason I support NARAL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
choicevoice Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Because they are males.
Males don't need fixing. If you get a vasectomy how can you procreate for jesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. They'd ban it in a minute
if they knew how much fun me and my missus have been having since I got my nuts clipped. Fun and sex are an unholy brew for those dessicated perverts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think all the uncircumcised ones should get a circumcision.
Edited on Sat Nov-20-04 05:10 PM by Cleita
It's in the Bible. It should be done in the biblical way too, without anesthesia. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
29. And it there should be born again circumcisms
Meaning if they had a circumcism when they were born they get another if they are a born again christian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. Fundies don't ban birth control, only Catholics, and Catholic...
don't like vasectomies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yes but - why?
It's just an earlier stage in the same process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Fundies claim life starts at conception. Stopping conception
therefore doesn't kill a life.

Catholic theology is more thorough, thus more complicated. At one point in the Middle Ages, Catholics believed that male sperm was the human being, and the egg was more of an incubator. There was some debate then whether masturbation was murder. Nocturnal emissions were considered like non-productive sex-- not good, but not anyone's fault.

I don't know the current theology for Catholics, but their tradition was that interfering with conception in any way was wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Since when?
Edited on Sat Nov-20-04 05:29 PM by Cleita
That used to be a popular method of birth control among Catholics back in my parents' day. You got a vasectomy, which in those days weren't reversible, then you went to confession and got forgiven. I know that priests often, off the cuff, recommended this loophole to couples who didn't want any more children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. From Pope Paul VI
"each and every marriage act (meaning sex) must remain open to the transmission of life"

You can't be forgiven once for the vasectomy, you would have to be forgiven each time you had intercourse after that.

Of course, some priests are more human than others. My grandmother was pschizophrenic, and was advised to have a historectomy after her second child. She was almost excommunicated for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. I left the Church when I left school almost fifty years ago.
It does seem the Church has taken a hard turn to the right these past decades. Too bad. They were coming in the modern world slowly and this present Pope stopped all of that. I surprised they haven't brought the Inquisition back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. You need to take a closer look.
Planned Parenthood has a list of all the anti-abortion organizations, who runs them, how to get in touch with them, mission statements, etc.

Many of them has the banning of contraceptives as their ultimate goal.

Go to the Planned Parenthood website and take a look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. Shhhhhhhh! Careful,they might hear you! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
17. There's a book I wish the whole country would read
by Jonathan Kirsch called God Against the Gods: the history of the war between monotheism and polytheism.

Not only is a reminder of how intolerance has been a hallmark of monotheism, but it is interesting to read all the talk about harlots -the general obsession with the oppression of the female gender.

If these folks get this crusade mentality off the ground the way it looks like they're doing, don't expect them to stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mackenzie Donating Member (86 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
20. Every sperm is sacred!
Someone get me a shrubbery!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
21. They are working on banning condoms
All the FDA/AIDS commission puppets are opposed to condoms. I'm sure vasectomies aren't far behind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
25. men are not concerned with controlling men's bodies?...
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kohodog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
26. They can ban it, but not until they all have one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
27. I'm sure that's right up on their list
after banning divorce.

If these yahoos are so worried about gay marriage destroying families, why aren't they worried about divorce? Divorce destroys a lot more families than all the gay marriages combined.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
30. stone the man equally that spread his seed outside of marriage...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Yes, I think we need to make adultery a felony.
Let's do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #31
37. my dad was here today, told him the older couple
Edited on Sat Nov-20-04 06:55 PM by seabeyond
that moved into the house across the street yesterday. told him, they are living in sin. (we are so non religious, father conservative mouth bible and values, but, not a part of his life)

he was surprised, what did you say

they are living in sin

huh, i dont think that is much an issue, as old as they are

yes it is i say.

lets go after em, all of em. i am in happy marriage, i am not getting divorced. nail em all for their sins. talking like a preacher of late. throws everyone. but fun
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
33. Why would you think they would?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldenOldie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-20-04 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Where are the off-spring of Jerry Falwell,
Pat Buchanan (a good Catholic), Newt Ginrich, etc.

I want these good Christians to prove their manly ability to reproduce.

Rick Sanatorium should have had more than 6-kids. The rhythm method ain't that great, and I don't think he is a man of abstinance.

Tom DeLay a good fundie should really have a tribe of children by now.

These guys are such lying hippocrites they could care less about children most of them don't even spend any time with their own, those that have them.

The Republican Congress is now studying and doing research on the affects of Porn while ignoring the serious National health issues of the children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC