Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Smoking Gun of Aids

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NikolaTeslaRocks Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-04 09:13 AM
Original message
The Smoking Gun of Aids
Has anyone researched this extensively?
I have not but I have a book regarding this subject soon coming soon.
I would like to hear what others think of this issue.

I think I may have messed up and your may see this section twice.
I am sorry for that.

http://www.worldnewsstand.net/health/aids.htm

The Smoking Gun of AIDS: a 1971 Flowchart
by Boyd E. Graves, J.D.



In 1977, a secret federal virus program produced 15,000 gallons of AIDS. The record reveals the United States was represented by Dr. Robert Gallo and the USSR was represented by Dr. Novakhatskiy of the diabolical Ivanosky Institute. On August 21, 1999, the world first saw the flowchart of the plot to thin the Black Population.

The 1971 AIDS flowchart coordinates over 20,000 scientific papers and fifteen years of progress reports of a secret federal virus development program. The epidemiology of AIDS is an identical match to the "research logic" identified in the five section foldout. The flowchart is page 61 of Progress Report #8 (1971) of the Special Virus program of the United States of America. We today, challenge world scientists to discussion of this document find. We believe there is a daily, growing number of world experts who are all coming to the same conclusion regarding the significance of the flowchart. Dr. Garth Nicolson has examined the flowchart as well as other top notch experts from around the world. It is time for Dr. Michael Morrissey of Germany to examine the flowchart and report to the world. In addition, we have now examined the 1978 report. It is heresy to continue to further argue the program ended in 1977. The 1978 report of the development of AIDS leaves no doubt as to the ("narrow result") candidate virus sought by the United States. The flowchart conclusively proves a secret federal plot to develop a "contagious cancer" that "selectively kills."

There is more in the link if you want to go to it. If I posted the whole thing I would violate the rules of the forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-04 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not to be picky but
The problem I see with this is most basic. AIDS is a medical physiological syndrom, not a virus. It cannot stored by the gallon.

The author probably meant to say HIV. With an error like that, I'm not likely to give credibility to this, even if the intended point is valid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-04 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. no, I do not know about its accuracy
but about fifteen years ago The Rolling Stone had an article which talked about when they were developing the polio virus, they were using organs from monkeys which might have been infected with a form of hiv, and when they injected into children in the Congo, the virus crossed animal species, and this is how it started

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-04 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. That I believe was part of the CIA disinformation effort . . .
. . . As for the discrediting of the original post that the author claimed AIDs was the bottled virus and not HIV may be splitting hairs. I would have to review that entire book to see if that was clarified anywhere by its author. This post uses a summary web press release. It is quite possible that the term AIDs is used interchangeably with HIV because that is what the general public knows the disease outcome to be. I would not have a problem with that. Has medical research shown the untreated outcome of becoming infected with HIV to be anything but AIDs, full blown or various stages of the syndrome?

The main point of the detailed flow chart, the original date of its development and review and the fact that a meeting of highly credentialed doctors from the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. and other countries from around the world is newsworthy. Why has this taken 33 years to surface and why are the media still not looking into this story? Maybe Hollywood can give us an answer. I think an audience of 100,000,000 movies goers would pay $8.50 each (or more depending on the city) to have some further insights into how HIV and the resulting AIDs epidemic began and why it was allowed to spread unchecked under Ronald Reagan. The movie could also be a made for TV 8 hour mini-series, which might do it more justice than a 120 to 130 minutes full feature film. I would like to know much more about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-28-04 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. get the shovel out guys and gals
time to shovel another bullshit story...the earliest case of hiv/aids may have been in the 50`s. the whole conspiracy against the Africans or the gays is bullshit. i thought the this bullshit was discreditted along time ago, of well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC