Kinsey and the Homosexual Revolution
by Judith Reisman, Ph.D.<1>
Americans bestow authority-and billions of tax dollars-upon science in the belief that scientists will make important contributions to society. There is the further belief that scientists, in their responsibility and trust, will behave ethically, especially in research that involves human subjects.<2> While the former is certainly historically accurate, such trust in the class "scientists" as honest, humane persons who deserve unquestioned public faith is sustained neither by cross-cultural or American science history.
Under scrutiny is the role of Dr. Alfred C. Kinsey and his contention that Americans are 10% to 47%, more or less, homosexual. Kinsey's percentage was seized upon by Harry Hay, the father of the homosexual "civil rights" movement, when Hay formed the Mattachine Society, urging that homosexuality be seen no longer as an act of sodomy but as a 10% minority class. Today, scores of homosexual activists cite Kinsey as the man who made the homosexual movement possible.<3>
But what if all of Kinsey's work was fraudulent, or worse? What if it reflects unethical scientists conducting unprosecuted criminal acts? For example, is it possible that scientists have conducted sexual experiments on children? Or that they could allow or encourage child abusers to conduct such experiments? The possibility that this actually occurred-and indeed that the claimed results of such experiments have played a critical and sustained role in our law and public policy-has led Congress to submit legislation which calls for an examination of the relevant facts. The legislation focuses on the research and publications of Dr. Alfred Kinsey and his colleagues ("The Kinsey Institute") conducted at Indiana University in Bloomington, Indiana from the late 1930s to the early 1950s. The legislation is known as H.R. 2749, "The Child Protection and Ethics in Education Act."
http://www.leaderu.com/jhs/reisman.htmlHas anyone researched this? Reisman could very well be spinning and lying to make her case, and what better way than to claim Kinsey a pedophile? That would of course mean all his studies are suspect and the left would have to agree to open the book again.
My guess is that Reisman is a wingnut using this to open the door, but does anyone know? I also suspect there is a good chance all her charges are down right false. She even claims Kinsey used a Nazi doctor - a sadistic pedophile.
Dunno. Has anyone been following this? Evidently she has a lot of influence with lawmakers throughout the states. Has she been concentrating on the Red states?