Ldotters vs. Princess Di

Must be that christian respect for the dead thing....

http://www.lucianne.com/threads2.asp?artnum=185693


Reply 4 - Posted by: TiminPhoenix, 11/27/2004 11:21:05 AM

This woman was a total whackjob. Her universe circled far more around herself than anyone else, to include her sons.

She took on the responsibilites of a Princess and failed them.

She told everyone she could her version of her worries, loving the attention. She called one married lover hundreds of times harrassing him until he had to contact Scotland Yard.

Here she allows herself to be taped saying the most private things. And she does so without any concern, that one day her comments might bring shame to her kids. Additionally she makes an allegation, based on nothing but the hunches her deluded mind produced. Again, this on tape.

She was a bigger tramp than her husband and did as much damage to the crown as she possibly could. This same crown her son will one day wear.

For all Prince Charles' faults and there are many, this woman being his choice as a spouse, ironically proved to be his worst.

Only John F. Kennedy stands before her as the most over-rated human these last few centuries have seen.


Reply 10 - Posted by: jhp, 11/27/2004 12:03:00 PM

And we trust her to be able to judge a "good lover" how.............???

You know what they say even when it's not good, it ain't so bad. Hey Di, you getting any lately? Yeah, that's what I thought-shutup!


Reply 13 - Posted by: msts, 11/27/2004 12:27:57 PM

These people are more of the same of vacant, self-absorbed rich people. All Saint Diana ever was was a sperm receptacle clothes hanger. She did nothing except bear the next king. Some job some accomplishment!


Reply 22 - Posted by: usmcsarge, 11/27/2004 1:57:35 PM

The "Peoples" Princess" (how absurd) was quite the airhead (a high school grad with a C+ average). Very self centered and very immature. Naive to the nth degree. More interested in rock stars and bad music than with the traditions and responsibilities required of her position. That she even make these tapes proves the point. And yes, her poor sons, who she claimed she loved and cared for above all else.

Old Marine Sarge


Reply 27 - Posted by: usmcsarge, 11/27/2004 7:39:49 PM

Only as a point of fact: The royal family brings in 2 1/2 times as much in tourist dollars than they are paid by the state.

Old Marine Sarge

ps - If Di was the innocent virgin as claimed, how did she know that many years ago he was a "lousy lover"?????

pps - It seems Chuck was P whipped by that ghastly looking Camilla, but otherwise faithful. It seems Di had a string of affairs that were anything but discreet.


Reply 30 - Posted by: Sludge, 11/28/2004 8:16:59 AM

She was a stupid cow. It's just too bad that her publicity didn't die with her.

She was chosen as Charles' wife to produce heirs, nothing more. She did her duty, and should have kept her pie-hole and her legs shut after that.

I blame her family for failing to tell her what her position meant. It meant duty, not some idiotic, moronic, sentimentally-sloppy fairy tale love story.

As for the comments about Camilla, at least she isn't some vapid sow slut like Di.


Reply 31 - Posted by: TiminPhoenix, 11/28/2004 8:35:12 AM

30 calls here for what she was....

And she was NEVER "Princess Diana". During her marriage, she was HRH the Princess of Wales. She was never a Princess in her own right. If anything, she would be "Princess Charles" because British royals take on the name and style of their husband. The only time that a woman who married into the family was given the title of "Princess in her own right" was HRH Princess Alice, the Dowager Duchess of Gloucester because of the death of her husband and because she was very close to QE2.

in order to deem her, "off"?

If one wasn't "off" to begin with, I'd think being married into that family would surely eventually make one that way.

Yes, she was "off" before her marriage. I knew this before her death, so it is not "defimation". She had major Daddy and childhood issues. She probably suffered from a Borderline disorder along with BiPolar. She was offered the best help money could buy, but she didn't take it. It is very sad.

I don't get this from 'People' Magazine. I get this from people who knew the Princess and from sources that you do not know of. I am not making things up, nor would I want to.

would be Royal Watchers.

and still led productive lives.

I think it is a great testimate to her that she raised her children as children, and not objects. Who knows, maybe they are bipolar, too?

To me, that's her greatest contribution.

Oh, yeah, that and the love she showed and received by her admirers. Admirers who numbered in the millions.

So, Mr. "I know more about it than you do", we shall just agree to disagree.

Fuck them!

displayed there by the Ldotters (whatever they are) is really breathtaking.

It's always amusing to see how RW Americans love to suck up to the British royal family. Look at all the faux-blue-blood snobbery! Priceless.

only got C+ in school.

Know anybody else like that?

I admired the fact that she worked so hard to bring awareness to all the landmines that were still blowing kids up.

But he doesn't come close to the humanitarian efforts of Di.