http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/09/05/DD87724.DTLI've gotten pretty upset at the distortions in this movie, but whad'ya know, turns out it's crap! :)
-------------------------
<SNIP>
No, the real reason "DC 9/11" should be taken to task is that the movie is terrible. It's uncommonly bad, a film so stiff and unwilling to breathe that when it overreaches for drama -- as it does every couple of minutes -- it nearly snaps in half. There's no blood in this lifeless dud, and the ridiculous re-creation of Bush as, well, as Rudy Giuliani, is so oafishly stylized that the president himself should dismiss the film as a ploy by the Democrats to make him look stupid.
<SNIP>
Who, it should be asked, could be so insanely out of touch with dramatic structure as to include this hard-sell exchange in which Bush and Cheney agree that the response needs to be fast and furious?:
Bush: "We always knew it might come to this."
Cheney: "You always said that if it did, this is how we'd earn our pay."
Bush: "And we will. It's a war."
Oh, it's a war all right. A war of endurance.
Chetwynd may be coming under attack from the liberal media for making a highly politicized and dubious film, but someone should be looking into whether he switched parties recently and this is some cruel, satirical hit piece on the president's image. After all, he couldn't simply be trying to make a fictional, no-agenda film, could he? If so, "DC 9/11" is an even more spectacular failure.