Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Laurie Mylroie Drunk on CSpan "Again"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JMac Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-25-04 12:26 PM
Original message
Laurie Mylroie Drunk on CSpan "Again"
Still trying to say Saddam was behind the WTC attack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-25-04 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. She'll never get off that.
Freepers swallow everything that she dreams up.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-25-04 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-25-04 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Was she waving
around the same typewritten sheets she had the last time? She had typed 3 columns of names. That was the proof she kept raving about that Hussein planned 9-11. I've quit CSPAN's Washington Journal for now. I used to watch every morning. But the situation is so sad in our country now that I can't face the reality of a country that honors with "courage" awards men who blatantly lied about an honorable man's war record while exalting a coward who has repeatedly lied to the world. CSPAN should have some standards. This woman has not credibility. Why give her a forum? She's the Nicky Hilton of wingnut conspiracy theories. No substance. Yet she's on TV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JMac Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-25-04 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sorry, Already posted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
housewolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-25-04 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Gosh maybe
she's the only one c-span could get on Christmas morning??? What do you think???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-25-04 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. If Kerry had won, he could have had her put into a mental institution
Oh well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-25-04 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Important information that she herself should memorize....
And then recite on Fauxsnooze every night for the next 8 weeks.

http://www.democracynow.org/print.pl?sid=03/07/15/1423259

>>GLEN RANGWALLA: Well, one of the most interesting things really, in recent claims by the U.S. administration has been reference to how the United Nations in its claim, the United States claim was verifying the suspicions they had of Iraq’s weapons.

So Donald Rumsfeld on Sunday's ABC program said--probably as his key justification for the belief that he had prior to the invasion--that the United Nations were estimating that Iraq had the capability to use chemical and biological weapons. That was, as it were his key pinch line in justifying why he believed that Iraq had these weapons. Now that is completely in contrast to what the United Nations itself was saying. The inspectors on the ground last found weapons in Iraq and declared them in 1994. That's when they destroyed the last chemical weapons inside the country.

>>Since 1994 they have not found a single item of chemical or biological warfare inside the country. And have related their suspicions as they're obliged do, that Iraq could have developed some material before 1991. That it still retained and it could have retained some equipment from that period. But they have no evidence, as they have continually said, of an ongoing program to retain or develop chemical and biological weapons that they were reasonably confident of. And for Donald Rumsfeld to go on ABC to say that the United Nations was saying that Iraq had the capability to use chemical and biological weapons is a complete misrepresentation of the facts of this case.<<


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FM Arouet666 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-25-04 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why do legitimate news agencies give air time to psychotics?

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2003/0312.bergen.html


"She is, in short, a crackpot, which would not be significant if she were merely advising say, Lyndon LaRouche. But her neocon friends who went on to run the war in Iraq believed her theories, bringing her on as a consultant at the Pentagon, and they seem to continue to entertain her eccentric belief that Saddam is the fount of the entire shadow war against America."


Someone please get her a padded room with a little stuffed Saddam doll to play with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onecitizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-25-04 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. She did look.........
and act drunk didn't she? She always looks like that. I guess maybe she's an alcoholic like bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC