Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let's flip it: thinking about Harrah's and Disney

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 02:17 PM
Original message
Let's flip it: thinking about Harrah's and Disney
There's a thread in LBN about a woman getting fired from Harrah's because she refused to wear makeup.

Now let's talk Disney. These guys have the dress code from Hell--the only dress code in America that's stricter than the Disney theme park dress code is the military's, and that's debatable.

Essentially, think "1955" and you've got it.

* No polo or golf shirts.
* The earring regulation is fairly complex--hoops no larger than a dime or flat earrings no larger than a quarter, no dangling earrings, one earring per ear and worn low on the ear...and only for women.
* Eye shadow and eyeliner, for women only, was approved in 1994.
* Moustaches for men were approved in 2000. Cornrows for men were approved in 2003.
* Women were authorized to wear open-toe and open-heel shoes in 2003; all women are required to wear hosiery.

Many years ago, the hairstyle regulation was so strict that the woman who portrayed Snow White had to wear a wig while in costume because Snow White's hairstyle required longer hair than a Disney cast member was allowed to have. I can't find any indication that this has changed.

I also found a story on line that says after Disney bought the Queen Mary, they ordered a male employee to either shave off his sailor's beard or be terminated.

(Note: this code is for the theme parks; Disney's employment website indicates that non-public-contact divisions don't have such onerous restrictions.)

Now! If a cast member was fired by Disney (oh, let's say someone who was an actor in a Wild West exhibit was canned for repeatedly wearing his cowboy boots when not in costume; cowboy boots are among the prohibited pieces of apparel) for violating Disney's "don't wear this and don't wear that" dress code, would DU scream about this injustice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ender Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. ugh - its a fine line...
basically, its because disney employees are considerred "entertainers", and arbitrary and sexist/discriminatory rules are ok if you're emplying entertainers, as opposed to ride-attendants or waitresses.

this is how Hooters got away with their... err... hiring qualifications, all their waitresses are considerred entertainers.

as for harrah's, i would have to look at the case, but i suspect that the people in question could have been classified as entertainers, also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-29-04 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Let's flip this too..
So, one day, a change in management at Disney decides that Asian cowboys didn't have the look of the old west that they wanted to portray. They quietly let an old and trusted employee go.

Or maybe it was a black man, and because they wanted a certain vision of the old west to come through they suggested that the black man wear caucasian make up for the sake of their big picture. Geez, if he really wanted to keep his job, he would have worn the makeup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC