Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Spent $350 million upgrading the carrier JFK now the Navy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Florida_Geek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 10:56 AM
Original message
Spent $350 million upgrading the carrier JFK now the Navy
want to retire her. Mmmmmmm

from http://www.jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/123104/met_17574373.shtml

"A Pentagon proposal to retire the Mayport-based USS John F. Kennedy as early as 2006 could deliver what state and local officials say is a crippling blow to Jacksonville's economy and the city's military presence.

This comes just eight months after the Navy's top official said the aircraft carrier would be in Jacksonville until 2018, and a year after the government pumped $350 million into upgrading the ship."

..cut....

The military spent $350 million overhauling the ship last year and the JFK was set for another $400 million worth of work during a year-long dry-dock period in Norfolk, Va., beginning in June. With the second stint of work, the JFK would have another 20 years of useful life and could go another seven years even without the work, Crenshaw said.

..more at the above article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Reich rationale: She's conventionally powered.
Reality: What's in a name? The Bushistas loathe the Kennedys and all the good they stood for.

Opinion: Bad strategy. What if an enemy figured out how to disable all the nukular powered carriers simultaneously? It may be a good idea to keep one carrier battle group going that doesn't need uranium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. just rename her after george the lesser
and she`ll be around for 20 more years. it`s that "jfk" thing that bothers little georgie...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Florida_Geek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. I think the Kitty Hawk is 7 years
older than the JFK, bingo....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe they'll outsource her instead?
They are always saying outsourcing is a good thing, so why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. That $350 Mil was Just a Federal Contribution to Booosh**'s Campaign
Gotta keep Florida from getting to blue to steal, but now that the
election is over, the pretense is no longer needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-31-04 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. CNN Headline News
I was flipping through channels and this ticker headline jumped out at me:

Retire 12 Carriers?

I always imagine the people typing these tickers are interns that couldn't spell to save their lives. I find myself much less angry overall now that I don't watch any news. Anytime I watch for even a minute it always makes me sad that millions and millions of sheep take every word as gospel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC