Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I just heard of TSP and the federal employees plan for retirement.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 07:37 PM
Original message
I just heard of TSP and the federal employees plan for retirement.
why isn't this open to all citizens?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. The same reason that their health plan isn't open to all
As far as they're concerned, we're proles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. You're not missing that much
with the health plans... With the FEHIB we get to chose from a number of pretty crappy plans.. HMO's PPO's (all with standard price tags) Don't worry.. nobody's getting anything for nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
latebloomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, it's like a 401K
You contribute part of your salary, it doesn't get taxed and the government matches it.

It's for employees of the government-- why should all citizens be able to join?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oneighty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Isn't this the plan
that the "Senators and Congress critters do not pay SS tax" E-Mail thing revolve around?

180
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
latebloomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Not sure about that
I think the Congresspeople may have a somewhat different plan. The Thrift plan was set up in the early 80s. Prior to that federal workers did not pay into Social Security but got decent pensions. Now workers do pay into Social Security, and get a MUCH smaller pension and the ability to contribute to the TSP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The Post Office matched up to a point. My TSP account and my
stock portfolio enabled me to pay off my mortgage when I became disabled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BamaGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. This is what we have
the non-matching part irritates me. Since we have so little control over how it's invested we just put a tiny bit in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Non- fed workers can have IRA's, 401-K's, company pensions etc. too
The TSP (same as a 401-K) and federal employees retirement plan take out extra payroll deductions from federal employees in addition to their Social Security payroll tax deductions. These plans are not a substitute for Social Security, but supplement what employees will get from Social Security, comparable to 401-K's and company or state pension plans.

The Thrift Savings Plan is a totally voluntary savings plan that was started about 20 years ago when Civil Service benefits were cut and Federal workers were put into the Social Security system. The TSP was intended to give Federal employees the opportunity to build up enough extra savings to make up for getting reduced Federal pensions than what they had been able to get under the old Civil Service system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Wally Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. More than twenty years ago


The changeover from CERS to FERS was a Carter administration doing. Just like only Nixon could go to China, only a Democrat could screw the Civil Service unions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-03-05 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. There was a big push to get vested people to change over
Edited on Thu Feb-03-05 10:05 PM by annabanana
from the CSRS to the FERS plan. My hubby and I figured "If there so damned anxious for us to switch over, it must be better for us NOT to". So we didn't. So we keep the original pension, which, so far, hasn't been diddled with.. but our contributions to the TSP don't get matching funds..although it is tax deferred.

edit for emphasis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
12. Why don't most Texas teachers contribute to social security?
They set up their own much better plan for themselves.

Does a kid get a check until 21 if his dad dies? Yes, thanks to us all pitching in -- well all except teachers.

When they say we must all do more to help, they mean "we" meaning all the rest of you guys. We've set up our own little thing on the side.

Same thing for helping low income workers get a decent retirement payment, disability payments and payments to immigrants who didn't have time to work a full career.

Our piece of the pie is smaller because we help those who don't have as much -- well we all do except teachers.

Professors at most Texas colleges have it even better. No social security for them either. They don't even have to be in TRS. They can take their retirement and the college's match, and put the whole thing 100 % in mutual funds called the Optional Retirement Program. In other words, professors in Texas already have a fully privatized system. The whole 12.8 %. Now does the professors union support the same for the rest of us?

Of course not. Who would care for the less fortunate?

The biggest hypocrite I know is a communist professor at the local college that I work with who wants to know each year why his mutual funds in his totally privatized retirement plan, didn't make 12 % this year.

It's a pretty common ailment. Look at the posts who want to raise taxes. Notice how they always want to raise taxes on some group which does not include themselves. Yes taxes need to go up. No, not my taxes. Those other guys' taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ghost_of_thoreau Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. ya lets give teachers even less money
professors dont even make that much money in the first place. And they spent half their lives going to school, and usually racking up student loan debt. All the times you were drinking beer and goofing off with your friends, the professors were studing and contributing valuable research findings for the benefit of the entire world. Yeah we should screw them over even more, since they sacrifice so little already...

jackass


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-04-05 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. So therefore they should have
a privatized retirement system?

I don't get that connection at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC