You think FOX/GOP ops are recreating image of chaos ala Chicago '68?

blm

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-09-03 07:58 PM
Original message

You think FOX/GOP ops are recreating image of chaos ala Chicago '68?

Edited on Tue Sep-09-03 08:49 PM by blm

All of these interruptions are getting to be unbelievable.

Who benefits from the portrayal of the Dem party as the party of protest and chaos?

Goofed with the 72. Thanks, carlos.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

jenk

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-09-03 07:58 PM
Response to Original message

1. it was there fault for accepting a debate on FOX!

They should've known better

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

nothingshocksmeanymore

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-09-03 07:59 PM
Response to Original message

2. Sounds pretty feasible to me..who allowed the debate to take place on FOx?

From or Reed?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

blm

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-09-03 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #2

3. This is a DNC debate.

DLC wouldn't be involved in the decision.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

ShaneGR

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-09-03 08:00 PM
Response to Original message

4. Wow, this is a lot of potential ammunition against Fox

shoddy producing

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Tom Yossarian Joad

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-09-03 08:00 PM
Response to Original message

5. Didn't they state that the audience was by invitation?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

jburton

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-09-03 08:18 PM
Response to Original message

6. Wait for the spin...

It will be interesting.

This disruption would never happen with * speaking. Hell, it wouldn't even be allowed within 4 miles of *

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

jiacinto

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-09-03 08:21 PM
Response to Original message

7. You mean 1968

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

blm

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-09-03 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #7

11. Yep.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

JI7

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-09-03 08:22 PM
Response to Original message

8. not many people watch it so it's not too bad

i didn't even know about this debate until early morning today.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Terwilliger

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-09-03 08:23 PM
Response to Original message

9. come on blm, you're not nutty

get off this conspiracy crap

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

blm

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-09-03 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #9

10. I am not a coincidence theorist, T willy.

That's for sure. I think the GOP machine is capable of ANYTHING.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

frank frankly

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Tue Sep-09-03 09:01 PM
Response to Original message

12. You can't spell GOP without OP

There is no reason to trust the GOP/Faux right now.

None.

On the bright side, tinfoil hats for everyone!

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:03 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.