Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WWIII: Technically, How Many Nations Would Have To Be At War

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
arwalden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:34 AM
Original message
WWIII: Technically, How Many Nations Would Have To Be At War
before it would be considered WWIII?

Does the "world war" label apply because of the number of nations involved in conflict? Or is does it refer to how globally widespread the conflict is?

-- Allen*
(* who should have paid closer attention in history and civics classes)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. For some, WWIII has been ongoing since the P2 shot JFK in '63
just as he was about to bust various nazis and freed east european serious crime internees who were claiming refugee status from soviet bloc countries. The proliferation of these, and their offpring, is at the heart of most terror-type offences for the last 40 years. The heat merely got turned up when the Catholic Church realised that documents relating to its collusion in WWII atrocities named the entire infrastructure of its financiers, networks, covert operations and support systems, and could go public at any given moment.
WWIII won't end until Bush 1 and 2 are tried for treason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Tough to say for sure until it happens...
but I would assume that it would be a war between the Great Powers, ie US, Britain, France, Germany, Japan, Russia, etc.

It would be the sort of war that would involve various alliances around the world, and strategic attacks on various countries not directly involved.

It would be big. And there would be no "winner."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree here...it would be BIG...
Edited on Wed Sep-10-03 07:39 AM by rasputin1952
Technically, there would not have to be a set # of countries, but some of those nations would have to have certain strategic perceptions as to how far they would be willing to go into conflict.

WW I, or more properly, The Great War, involved most of Europe, very little of Asia, Africa, none of South America, and none of The US until 1917.

WW II, on the other hand was ruly global, with only Antarctica,as a major land mass left untouched. That was determined by how far the Axis, especially the Germans and Japanese were willing to expand their sphere of influence.

Now, with nuclear devices, all bets are off....to be honest, if a 'losing' nation were to feel too threatened, the life on earth would be completely different in a matter of days. :nuke:


Whew.......way too early for this, I need more COFFEE!

:hi: :donut:

edited for very poor spelling this time in the AM

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. all of Europe and us
would equal wwiii
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. It likely wouldn't be
"World Wars" were very common from the mid-1700s on, only two of them are called world wars because of the sheer size of the battles. But in their days the seven years war, the 30 years war, the american revolutionary war (which saw fighting in Europe, India and Africa, as well as Canada andthe Caribbean).

Basically the naming of wars only comes from whatever it becomes popular to call it, which is why some wars have more than one name etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. Duby hisself has been calling it the WORLD WIDE war on terror...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wasn't WW1 called "the Great War" until WW2?
AKA "the war to end all wars"

The Great War and the Great Depression sure were not great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. yes
it was
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathy in Cambridge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-03 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Off topic: I love your Judy Holiday
'Born Yesterday' is one of my favorite movies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC