|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
0rganism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 03:53 PM Original message |
Poll question: Do you support the military response "to terrorism", post 9-11? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
patdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
1. I do not think the 'Unsure'. prior to the 'Diplomatic way' is correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 04:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. good point. I should have made another option for that opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
2. So far, 100% strongly oppose? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
3. It was a criminal act. It entailed an appropriate response. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherryperry (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 04:02 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. So, Brotherjohn, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Brotherjohn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 04:29 PM Response to Reply #8 |
18. Much worse... no valid reason for it at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrBenchley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 04:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
19. Amen, brother!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kamika (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 05:09 PM Response to Reply #3 |
21. no they did NOT say this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VermontDem2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 04:00 PM Response to Original message |
4. how about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewYorkerfromMass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 04:03 PM Original message |
No... We just needed to focus on Afghanistan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VermontDem2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
5. who the hell voted for the first option? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StopTheMorans (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 04:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. lurking freepers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 04:04 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Some joker, probably |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FlashHarry (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
7. Personally, I think the attack on Afghanistan was justified. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VermontDem2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 04:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. I did at first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StandWatie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 04:05 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. I don't think we really needed to do anything there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheYellowDog (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 05:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
23. That's so foolish of you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zero Gravitas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
10. What military response? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 04:06 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Point taken, I should have put "to terrorism" in quotes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cherryperry (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 04:07 PM Response to Original message |
15. I voted for the 4th option. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
radwriter0555 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
16. The US military has NOT responded to terrorism in any way, shape or form. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 04:25 PM Response to Original message |
17. so no one blindly trusts our leaders to handle the matter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
0rganism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 05:07 PM Response to Original message |
20. bumping for additional responses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheYellowDog (498 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
22. I voted for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Sep-10-03 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
24. On September 11, 2001, the whole world was with us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:24 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC